[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks are 5th....
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
12/7/2010  1:59 PM
... in East.

With another very good week or 2 we can really make a statement in East as 1 of best teams!

KNICKS on the way UP!!!
AUTOADVERT
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/7/2010  2:00 PM
Yes! This is good!
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
umynot
Posts: 21465
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/4/2008
Member: #2093
USA
12/7/2010  2:01 PM
Yes it is!!
KNICKS on the way UP!!!
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
12/7/2010  2:07 PM
We are 6th bro http://espn.go.com/nba/standings/_/group/2
1 Boston 16 4 .800 - 9-1 7-3 4-1 13-2 100.9 92.1 +8.8 Won 7 8-2
2 Orlando 15 6 .714 1 ½ 9-3 6-3 5-2 12-4 97.4 90.8 +6.6 Lost 2 7-3
3 Miami 14 8 .636 3 10-3 4-5 4-1 12-4 100.1 91.7 +8.5 Won 5 6-4
4 Chicago 11 8 .579 4 ½ 7-2 4-6 1-0 2-4 100.6 99.7 +0.9 Won 2 5-5
5 Atlanta 14 8 .636 3 6-5 8-3 3-2 10-5 98.4 95.9 +2.5 Won 1 6-4
6 New York 13 9 .591 4 4-5 9-4 3-2 8-4 107.7 106.1 +1.6 Won 5 9-1
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
12/7/2010  2:11 PM
5th in winning percentage
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
12/7/2010  2:12 PM
Silverfuel wrote:We are 6th bro http://espn.go.com/nba/standings/_/group/2
1 Boston 16 4 .800 - 9-1 7-3 4-1 13-2 100.9 92.1 +8.8 Won 7 8-2
2 Orlando 15 6 .714 1 ½ 9-3 6-3 5-2 12-4 97.4 90.8 +6.6 Lost 2 7-3
3 Miami 14 8 .636 3 10-3 4-5 4-1 12-4 100.1 91.7 +8.5 Won 5 6-4
4 Chicago 11 8 .579 4 ½ 7-2 4-6 1-0 2-4 100.6 99.7 +0.9 Won 2 5-5
5 Atlanta 14 8 .636 3 6-5 8-3 3-2 10-5 98.4 95.9 +2.5 Won 1 6-4
6 New York 13 9 .591 4 4-5 9-4 3-2 8-4 107.7 106.1 +1.6 Won 5 9-1


depends on your view
we are 5th in percentage
not that it matters

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/7/2010  2:12 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/7/2010  2:13 PM
Because Chicago leads that wack Central Division. I think that's some bum stuff, but I get it from a cash money standpoint. It's still bum stuff.

What they should do is guarantee a division leader a playoff spot, not a top 3 seed. That's crazy. Let them be 8th if they're 8th.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
12/7/2010  2:14 PM
BlueSeats wrote:5th in winning percentage


you might have beat me
to the clarification
but mine was haiku

check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
martin
Posts: 76270
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/7/2010  2:17 PM
eViL wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:5th in winning percentage


you might have beat me
to the clarification
but mine was haiku

haiku posting mutha****a

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/7/2010  2:21 PM
umynot wrote:... in East.

With another very good week or 2 we can really make a statement in East as 1 of best teams!

man, look as the next half dozen games coming up. It's kinda scary but it will provide a truer barometer of where the KNICKS are at.

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
12/7/2010  2:38 PM
ahh, my bad. the glass is still half empty but its starting to look like its half full.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
12/7/2010  2:41 PM
eViL wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:5th in winning percentage


you might have beat me
to the clarification
but mine was haiku

I say fukc you to haiku.

There, not only was I quicker but poetry even rhymes.
DurzoBlint
Posts: 23067
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/10/2006
Member: #1152
USA
12/7/2010  2:52 PM
eViL wrote:
BlueSeats wrote:5th in winning percentage


you might have beat me
to the clarification
but mine was haiku

gazuntite

the fact that you can't even have an unrelated thread without some tool here bringing him up make me think that rational minds are few and far between. Bunch of emotionally weak, angst riddled people. I mean, how many times can you argue the same shyt
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/7/2010  5:27 PM
Silverfuel wrote:We are 6th bro http://espn.go.com/nba/standings/_/group/2
1 Boston 16 4 .800 - 9-1 7-3 4-1 13-2 100.9 92.1 +8.8 Won 7 8-2
2 Orlando 15 6 .714 1 ½ 9-3 6-3 5-2 12-4 97.4 90.8 +6.6 Lost 2 7-3
3 Miami 14 8 .636 3 10-3 4-5 4-1 12-4 100.1 91.7 +8.5 Won 5 6-4
4 Chicago 11 8 .579 4 ½ 7-2 4-6 1-0 2-4 100.6 99.7 +0.9 Won 2 5-5
5 Atlanta 14 8 .636 3 6-5 8-3 3-2 10-5 98.4 95.9 +2.5 Won 1 6-4
6 New York 13 9 .591 4 4-5 9-4 3-2 8-4 107.7 106.1 +1.6 Won 5 9-1

Can someone explain to me why Chicago is ahead of Atlanta and not the Heat? Shouldn't the top division leader occupy the top three position. Why is Miami in the three spot when they are not leading the their division. Am I missing something? Something just doesn't seem right.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
12/7/2010  5:42 PM
Vmart wrote:
Silverfuel wrote:We are 6th bro http://espn.go.com/nba/standings/_/group/2
1 Boston 16 4 .800 - 9-1 7-3 4-1 13-2 100.9 92.1 +8.8 Won 7 8-2
2 Orlando 15 6 .714 1 ½ 9-3 6-3 5-2 12-4 97.4 90.8 +6.6 Lost 2 7-3
3 Miami 14 8 .636 3 10-3 4-5 4-1 12-4 100.1 91.7 +8.5 Won 5 6-4
4 Chicago 11 8 .579 4 ½ 7-2 4-6 1-0 2-4 100.6 99.7 +0.9 Won 2 5-5
5 Atlanta 14 8 .636 3 6-5 8-3 3-2 10-5 98.4 95.9 +2.5 Won 1 6-4
6 New York 13 9 .591 4 4-5 9-4 3-2 8-4 107.7 106.1 +1.6 Won 5 9-1

Can someone explain to me why Chicago is ahead of Atlanta and not the Heat? Shouldn't the top division leader occupy the top three position. Why is Miami in the three spot when they are not leading the their division. Am I missing something? Something just doesn't seem right.

I have no idea either. I thought the division leaders were supposed to be the top 3 seeds. Both ESPN and Yahoo have Miami as the 3 seed.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/7/2010  5:44 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/7/2010  5:45 PM
Because the division champions are guaranteed a top-4 seed. If there is a team with a better record than a division champ, like Miami is better than Chicago, then they can get a higher seed, but Chicago can't go lower than 4th.

Division champs are guaranteed a top-4 seed, not top-3.

What I said in my earlier post in this thread is that I feel they should be guaranteed a top-8, nothing more.

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
12/7/2010  5:45 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/7/2010  5:46 PM
orangeblobman wrote:Because the division champions are guaranteed a top-4 seed. If there is a team with a better record than a division champ, like Miami is better than Chicago, then they can get a higher seed, but Chicago can't go lower than 4th.

Division champs are guaranteed a top-4 seed, not top-3.

Can you send some sort of legit source on this? I thought that the divison leaders were supposed to get the first 3 seeds since the NBA went from 2 divisions in each conference to 3.
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
12/7/2010  5:48 PM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
orangeblobman wrote:Because the division champions are guaranteed a top-4 seed. If there is a team with a better record than a division champ, like Miami is better than Chicago, then they can get a higher seed, but Chicago can't go lower than 4th.

Division champs are guaranteed a top-4 seed, not top-3.

Can you send some sort of legit source on this? I thought that the divison leaders were supposed to get the first 3 seeds since the NBA went from 2 divisions in each conference to 3.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NBA_Playoffs#Format

Wiki is as legit as it gets in this here 21st century, yes?

WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
12/7/2010  5:58 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/7/2010  5:59 PM
Thanks Blob.

I don't understand the logic behind that however. What's the point of expanding the divisions like they did a few years ago if the division winners can't get the top 3 seeds? Protecting divison winners to a seed no lower than 4 is stupid.

3 division champs should be 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.
Panos
Posts: 30089
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
12/7/2010  7:18 PM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Thanks Blob.

I don't understand the logic behind that however. What's the point of expanding the divisions like they did a few years ago if the division winners can't get the top 3 seeds? Protecting divison winners to a seed no lower than 4 is stupid.

3 division champs should be 1st, 2nd, and 3rd.


Because they're only guaranteed home court in the first round. If the top four seeds win the first round, that team that snuck in by winning its division plays the 1 seed, instead of the 3rd best team having to play them. Tough noogies.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Knicks are 5th....
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy