Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Andrew
Posts: 26600 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #1 USA |
![]() How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() Andrew wrote:How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something. http://hoopshype.com/salaries/new_jersey.htm i said about $22M... their expiring contracts this year add up to maybe $1M less, give or take... not a big deal. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
Andrew
Posts: 26600 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #1 USA |
![]() TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something. Not a big deal but I think the numbers add up to ~18.6M. Remember not to count players that were waived and not on the roster. PURE KNICKS LOVE
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() Andrew wrote:TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something. if i got the numbers wrong my apologies... i didn't bother to check which players were waived... still, $18.6M in expiring contracts is a significant figure... the Knicks have about the same in their expirings this year... the point is, the Nets do in fact have a lot to offer another team that's willing to deal. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
Andrew
Posts: 26600 Alba Posts: 2 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #1 USA |
![]() TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something. I think the point you make (Nets having assets > Knicks) is a good one for the Knicks to sit tight and wait. If you take the position that the Nets have more attractive assets and more attractive talent to compliment Melo, it doesn't seem like the Knicks can win a trade bargaining war. The only way Denver agrees to trade with the Knicks and take less is because Melo only wants to goto the Knicks (refuses an extension otherwise). Which begs the question, if Melo only wants the Knicks, why not wait? PURE KNICKS LOVE
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
![]() Andrew wrote:TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:TMS wrote:Andrew wrote:How did you come up with the $22M in expiring from the Nets? I must be missing something. the Nets aren't willing to give up Lopez in any deal for Melo, so that evens the playing field quite a bit... the Nuggets will want to get back something in exchange for Melo, they're not going to just let him walk for nothing this summer... if we wait, we risk losing out on getting 1 of the top 3 scorers in the league... all because we weren't willing to give up untouchable franchise talent like AR, Gallo or whoever else? let's be real... none of those guys are likely to make as much of an impact on this team as Melo would... i'm not saying it's impossible, but it's not likely... we already know what type of player Melo is, he's a scoring machine... put him next to Amare with at least an average to above average PG like Ray Felton & a few role players, & you have a team that can contend in the EC... right now our roster is very average & i don't think much will change unless a major acquisition is made... i say we take control of our own destiny & not leave things up to fate like we did last summer... no more rolling the dice on completely unknown outcomes... if we can make a trade to get Melo now, i say go for it... enough w/the waiting. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|