[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Path To A Permanent Peace Between NBA Players And Owners
Author Thread
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30151
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/31/2010  11:57 AM
I thought it was brilliant. You should read the whole thing but here is the meat of it

Read more: http://realgm.com/src_feature_pieces/957/20100720/the_path_to_a_permanent_peace_between_nba_players_and_owners/#ixzz0vH8ZMIdW


In broad terms, the league should maintain roughly the current amount – 57 percent of the basketball-related income (BRI) – effectively allocated to player salaries. This will become a hard cap, with all 57 percent of BRI going to the immediate salary pool for players. All labor costs will come from this kitty. Management will divide the remaining 43 percent between the team owners.

Player salaries will be determined by three criteria:

1. base/performance pay based upon how many minutes a player plays (70 Percent of total, or $1.4 billion)

2. all-star pay to reward the better players in the league (20 percent of total, or $400 million)

3. team pay, to reward players on the best teams (10 percent of total, or $200 million)

Base-Performance Pay: Every team is allocated 12 full salary slots, and then three half-salary slots, for a roster of 15. The three players on the 15 man roster who are on the 12 man game roster the least get the one-half of the base salary.

If a player only plays part of a season in the NBA, their salary is prorated accordingly

The players who play the most deserve to be paid more. Most teams have rotations that run no more than nine deep, so the 270 players in the league who play the most should be compensated. The criteria for this allocation is strictly the average number of minutes player per-game, for a minimum of 55 games. (If a player plays less than 55 games, their total number of minutes is still divided by 55 to determine their average. A DNP-CD counts as a game played.) If a player is injured for as much as 30 percent of a season he is not penalized.

Players ranked 1-90: $6.5 million each
Players ranked 91-180: $5 million each
Players ranked 181-270: $2.5 million each
Players ranked 271-360: $1 million each
Players ranked 361-450*: $500,000 each
* the last three guys on each team’s 15 man roster

All-Star Bonus Pay: These will be determined by MVP votes and all-NBA team votes. The top 25 vote-getters in the MVP balloting will get paid bonuses. There will be ten all-NBA teams for each conference, so 20 five-man rosters and 100 players (two-thirds of all starting players in the NBA) will get rewarded. The voting procedures will have to be determined in the CBA, with the players and coaches the likely voters. Voting should be done immediately after the regular season so as not to penalize players on lottery teams. The top 100 players will be rewarded, sometimes handsomely.

MVP voting (25 players covered):
1st-5th: $5 million each
6th-10th: $4.5 million each
11th-15th: $4 million each
16th-20th: $3.5 million each
21st-25th: $3 million each

All-Conference (100 players covered):
1st team EC & WC: $4.8 million each
2nd team EC & WC: $4.4 million each
3rd team EC & WC: $4.0 million each
4th team EC & WC: $3.6 million each
5th team EC & WC: $3.2 million each
6th team EC & WC: $2.8 million each
7th team EC & WC: $2.4 million each
8th team EC & WC: $2.0 million each
9th team EC & WC: $1.6 million each
10th team EC & WC: $1.2 million each

Team Performance Pay: Players on the best teams should get compensated for contributing to a winning team. These shares are allocated equally to players 1-12 on a roster, with half-shares to players 13-15 in minutes played. Players on all non-lottery teams receive compensation, with the better teams getting the larger shares. The groupings are determined by how a team fares in the playoffs.

Players on Teams 1-4: $2 million each
Players on Teams 5-8: $1 million each
Players on Teams 9-16: $425,000 each

If you apply this system to actual NBA players for the past season, for example, you will see that the players fare well. The truly great superstars—LeBron James, Kobe Bryant, Dwight Howard, Dwyane Wade and Kevin Durant—all make in the $16-18 million range. The 20th-25th best player, an all-star but not a superstar, would get in the $13 million to $15 million range. From there players salaries would head down to the 90th best player, who is getting in the $8-10 million range, depending upon how his team fares.

The lower-level starter – not a top 100 player -- and the first sub off the bench, would make between $5 million and $7 million.

The journeyman deep rotation player, the 7th, 8th and 9th guy in the rotation, would make around $2.5 million, plus their team bonus.

The base pay for rookies who don’t play and marginal roster guys would be about the same as it is today, unless they were on a playoff team, then it would be better.

For most players, this will be a better deal, even a much better deal. At worse, it will be a wash. The reason is simple: All the money goes to the players who actually produce. No money at all goes to dead weight. That frees up, depending upon you count, several hundred million dollars. If some guy comes out of the woodwork and plays great basketball, he gets paid for it right away. If he stops playing well, he stops getting paid well.

Defenders of the status quo acknowledge many guys, especially younger players, are often underpaid, but say they will get theirs down the road. Later in their career they will get what they are worth. Well why shouldn’t they be paid what they are worth now? They have earned it now. What if they rip up their knees or get in a car crash and never get to cash in down the road? Then they are out many millions of dollars. And if they are good down the road they will keep getting paid exactly what they are worth down the road. The only way they lose is if they could sign a huge long-term deal and then begin to play at a much lower level, a la Wally Szczerbiak, Raef LaFrentz, Jerome James, Jared Jeffries, Vladimir Radmanovic, etc. etc. Do we really want a salary structure that funnels money to guys who are ridiculously overpaid and/or over the hill at the expense of the guys who are playing well?

It is a pretty simple concept, that accord to basic traditions of fairness. It is high time it is adopted by the NBA.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
AUTOADVERT
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
7/31/2010  7:27 PM
One more commentary on the new CBA

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/13683901/should-nba-adopt-nfllike-player-movement-rules-good-question/rss

Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
7/31/2010  9:54 PM
Olbrannon wrote:One more commentary on the new CBA

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/13683901/should-nba-adopt-nfllike-player-movement-rules-good-question/rss

So what Eddy Curry type will get?
And if player get ingured like Ming or Oden. Is he screwed?
If yes, what the point to play hard, better play soft...

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
8/1/2010  10:22 AM
arkrud wrote:
Olbrannon wrote:One more commentary on the new CBA

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/13683901/should-nba-adopt-nfllike-player-movement-rules-good-question/rss

So what Eddy Curry type will get?
And if player get ingured like Ming or Oden. Is he screwed?
If yes, what the point to play hard, better play soft...

Not sure what you are saying here. The above link is pertinent to a thread about the new CBA that will happen one day.
I was merely calling attention to it. I do not myself intend to convey these are my views ;-)

Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/1/2010  11:09 PM
Olbrannon wrote:
arkrud wrote:
Olbrannon wrote:One more commentary on the new CBA

http://www.cbssports.com/nba/story/13683901/should-nba-adopt-nfllike-player-movement-rules-good-question/rss

So what Eddy Curry type will get?
And if player get ingured like Ming or Oden. Is he screwed?
If yes, what the point to play hard, better play soft...

Not sure what you are saying here. The above link is pertinent to a thread about the new CBA that will happen one day.
I was merely calling attention to it. I do not myself intend to convey these are my views ;-)

I am just pinting up that this is not so simple and so easy... abd lock out is a very probable possibility

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Panos
Posts: 30091
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
8/1/2010  11:31 PM    LAST EDITED: 8/1/2010  11:33 PM
I like the idea in spirit.
In practice though, you'll see a lot of discord between players and coaches when players don't get the minutes they want.
I think if you could replace a different metric in for minutes, it could work. Not sure what that would be though.

Another thing, I doubt the Union would ever ratify this where injured players get their salaries slashed. Though that's what often cripples a team.

The interesting offshoot of this plan would be that suddenly teams would be left to trade players purely on their merits as players, NOT on based on how bad their contracts are.

sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

8/2/2010  12:47 AM
i dont see the union giving up guaranteed contracts unless they get some other concession (what the heck would that be?). how would you enforce a salary cap if salaries arent fixed year to year? you have no basis to plan for the future if a guy can go from 4 mill, to 13 then drop or go up again. this makes cap management a nightmare.
GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
Panos
Posts: 30091
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
8/2/2010  9:15 AM
sidsanders wrote:i dont see the union giving up guaranteed contracts unless they get some other concession (what the heck would that be?). how would you enforce a salary cap if salaries arent fixed year to year? you have no basis to plan for the future if a guy can go from 4 mill, to 13 then drop or go up again. this makes cap management a nightmare.

It sounds like the players would just make what they would make
and the "hard cap" would just be league wide. But if that's the case,
I don't know how they would keep small market (or otherwise ****ty) teams competitive.
Maybe I'm missing something.

The Path To A Permanent Peace Between NBA Players And Owners

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy