[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Which team did you love more? 99 or 94 Knicks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
Elite
Posts: 6372
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510
My knee-jerk reaction has always been the 94 team, Because that team legitimately had a shot to beat Houston and win it all. Probobly should have.

The 99 team had no real shot to beat San Antonio without Ewing, but looking back I have to admit it.. I loved this team more than the 94 bad boys.

Spree, Houston, CAMBY especially.. Even Childs.. Man i loved this squad, that run in the playoffs will NEVER be matched as a Knick fan. Van Gundy > Riley. Remember his wife crying? That says it all.

I swear if Ewing was 100% healthy that year, we take the Chip. San Antonio was good, but I'd bet anything with the momentum we had build to that point, if the Big Fella was around - we take it and it would have been one of the GREATEST sports stories in history.


94 Knicks
99 Knicks
View Results


Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
knickstorrents
Posts: 21121
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/23/2010
Member: #3050
Hong Kong
7/24/2010  2:34 AM
'94 Knicks only because Anthony Mason is my favorite player among both of those teams!
Rose is not the answer.
AUTOADVERT
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
7/24/2010  2:46 AM
Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.
smackeddog
Posts: 38390
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
7/24/2010  3:12 AM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.

I'm not a fan of this "it's a championship or it's meaningless business" mentality- those teams and what they achieved mattered, and they're a big reason why we fans have endured the past ten years. Competing, fighting to win, fighting against the odds, showing heart, thats what I want to see when I watch basketball.
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
7/24/2010  3:17 AM
smackeddog wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.

I'm not a fan of this "it's a championship or it's meaningless business" mentality- those teams and what they achieved mattered, and they're a big reason why we fans have endured the past ten years. Competing, fighting to win, fighting against the odds, showing heart, thats what I want to see when I watch basketball.

I hear you. But for me, it just comes down to winning. If you don't achieve it, you can still enjoy the journey. But you play to win it all.
ramtour420
Posts: 26290
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
7/24/2010  3:55 AM
I came to America in the early summer of 94. Watched the Stanley Cup win. Started watching bball and the Knicks in like 96 or 97. Right when we gave Houston that contract.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510
7/24/2010  4:06 AM
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.

I'm not a fan of this "it's a championship or it's meaningless business" mentality- those teams and what they achieved mattered, and they're a big reason why we fans have endured the past ten years. Competing, fighting to win, fighting against the odds, showing heart, thats what I want to see when I watch basketball.

I hear you. But for me, it just comes down to winning. If you don't achieve it, you can still enjoy the journey. But you play to win it all.

you must be young.. no way u saw these 2 teams and could feel that way
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/24/2010  4:21 AM
smackeddog wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.

I'm not a fan of this "it's a championship or it's meaningless business" mentality- those teams and what they achieved mattered, and they're a big reason why we fans have endured the past ten years. Competing, fighting to win, fighting against the odds, showing heart, thats what I want to see when I watch basketball.

amen.

¿ △ ?
Childs2Dudley
Posts: 23906
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 1/25/2010
Member: #3051
USA
7/24/2010  5:07 AM
1999 because I can actually remember that better than 1994.
"Our attitude toward life determines life's attitude towards us." - Earl Nightingale
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
7/24/2010  7:29 AM
Neither-the 69-70 knicks hands down followed by the 1873 team.
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098
7/24/2010  8:03 AM
TheSage wrote:Neither-the 69-70 knicks hands down followed by the 1873 team.

Yeah...that 1873 team was a good one. I hear that playing basketball on the grass courts they used was a bytch, though.

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
OasisBU
Posts: 24138
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/18/2002
Member: #257
USA
7/24/2010  8:18 AM
94 - 99 was cool but I never felt they had a shot plus Ewing was out. As much as I love Spree, H20, and Camby - Mason, Starks, Ewing, Oak, LJ all mean more to me. The 99 crew represents the decline of the 90's while 94 is the height. It's also Riley or Van Gundy and to be honest I always preferred Pat. I have grown to respect Van Gundy but I didn't like him for a long time and in my opinion the way he left wa worse than Pat.
"If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just SUCK." Kenny Powers
TheSage
Posts: 21039
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/20/2003
Member: #386
7/24/2010  8:19 AM
Paladin55 wrote:
TheSage wrote:Neither-the 69-70 knicks hands down followed by the 1873 team.

Yeah...that 1873 team was a good one. I hear that playing basketball on the grass courts they used was a bytch, though.

They were well mowed-and I defy anyone here to prove they weren't the best ever
iSergio
Posts: 21499
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2010
Member: #3043
USA
7/24/2010  9:12 AM
1994 by far.
skeng
Posts: 22090
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 10/27/2009
Member: #2959
Denmark
7/24/2010  9:39 AM
'99 because I'm a yoot
Legalize di NBA
Nalod
Posts: 71240
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/24/2010  10:05 AM
94' as it was legit.

99 Team in short strike affected season was a nice fluke. We were the 8th seed and upset Miami on H20's prayer.

Beating Miami was always great.

It was a fun ride but we were so overmatched by the awsome spurs it was never in question and the games not close.
Maybe its how Spree left that taints his stay here. His true character did show up after time and while he was great on the court he bought too much drama off it.

Sprees personal life never was an issue so much as always not being in camp and the broken wrist. These things carried into the season and while it may be disrecpectful to the owner and coaches, its ultimatly disrescpetful to the players.

I'll take the starphuch Riley glamor and the legit shot the 94' team.

My first was the 73' knicks. Now we talking!
Olbrannon
Posts: 21913
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/2/2009
Member: #2919
USA
7/24/2010  10:17 AM
In my mind if Ewing is in the Knicks win in '99 hands down.
Bill Simmons on Tyreke Evans "The prototypical 0-guard: Someone who handles the ball all the time, looks for his own shot, gets to the rim at will and operates best if his teammates spread the floor to watch him."
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
7/24/2010  10:33 AM
TheSage wrote:
Paladin55 wrote:
TheSage wrote:Neither-the 69-70 knicks hands down followed by the 1873 team.

Yeah...that 1873 team was a good one. I hear that playing basketball on the grass courts they used was a bytch, though.

They were well mowed-and I defy anyone here to prove they weren't the best ever

HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! The question is whether they were better than the 1870 team.

Anyway, I'll have to say '99, although '94 is close. I don't feel like '99 was a fluke though. I think the 8th seed was a fluke and had the Knicks played a full season would've been the 3rd or 4th seed. In '99, with Ewing, the Knicks may have won a championship.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
7/24/2010  10:38 AM
99 was awesome. the houston shot and lj play were among the greatest ever. i wouldn’t be so sure about beating SA though even with ewing. but without him you felt there was no chance whatsoever.

94 was a damn mission. it was all so locked in and focused. let's get this s**t done. except we didn’t.
knicksbabyyeah
Posts: 21472
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/19/2001
Member: #100
Netherlands
7/24/2010  10:47 AM
My fav Knick
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
7/24/2010  11:37 AM
Elite wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:
smackeddog wrote:
JrZyHuStLa wrote:Neither resulted in a championship, so it don't really matter to me. They were both good I guess.

I'm not a fan of this "it's a championship or it's meaningless business" mentality- those teams and what they achieved mattered, and they're a big reason why we fans have endured the past ten years. Competing, fighting to win, fighting against the odds, showing heart, thats what I want to see when I watch basketball.

I hear you. But for me, it just comes down to winning. If you don't achieve it, you can still enjoy the journey. But you play to win it all.

you must be young.. no way u saw these 2 teams and could feel that way

Not that young. Late 20s.

If I have to pick, I'll go with the 94 team.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Which team did you love more? 99 or 94 Knicks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy