First my apologies. I know Lebron has been discussed to death on this site and others, but I was away for the weekend and didn't get a chance to skim the many posts on here. Anyway, I was having a discussion with a family member of mine and he claims that the moment Lebron decided to join Wade in Miami, he has officially removed himself from being amomngst the elite (Jordan, Kobe, Magic, Bird, Wilt etc). Obviously, any discussion of Lebron being in that group was premature at this point since he didn't win any rings yet, but if he did win one in Cleveland his place would have been cemented.
With that said, if Lebron wins his rings with Wade at his side, why should that take away from Lebrons legacy? Oscar Robertson essentially did the same thing. Cincinnati is Robertsons adopted home. He went to college there and played his first 10 yrs for the Cincy Royals. He was the best all around player in the league yet he won no rings. He left to go play with Kareem with the Bucks where he finally got his ring. The only difference is Oscar spent 10 yrs in Cincy while Lebron spent 7 in Cleve. Also Robertson was slightly on the downside of his prime was still very good.
To this day, no one ever takes anything away from Oscar Robertson for joining Kareem to get the ring he wouldn't have won by himself. Oscar is always in the top 5 discussion of all time greats and some still say he is number 1. So my question is whats the difference?