[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It would never happen but I'd love to replaced MDA with LAL Phil Jackson
Author Thread
DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

5/26/2010  2:05 AM
If disdained coach Phil Jackson ex knick player on their only 2 NBA title teams ever
wanted to prove something to me I'd love to see him come in here & replace NYK current
head coach MDA.

I'd do that in a heartbeat & it would be nearly as good as a FA signing.
We would have a coach whom teaches D and develops talent as well as attract
most FA's stars here to NY, something we dont have now.

Phil J. story
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_ylt=AhDAJYyUEjGKQRCu6ew8rBs5nYcB?slug=ap-jackson-coaching

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/26/2010  2:11 AM
The Boston Celtics won a title with Doc Rivers as head coach. Phil has had some of the greatest talent this league has seen. It's more about the talent than the coach and always has been. I'm not overly concerned with the coach, cuz when Phils Lakers didn't have the horses, despite having Kobe, they didn't win. He's not God. I'm all for giving MDA the horses and letting him guide the team to a title run. Phil's not the only coach that can ride a winning horse.
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

5/26/2010  2:13 AM
if he wanted to prove something he woulda taken over several years ago. he would have had a chance to show more of his coaching then dealing with top of their game elite player lead teams.
GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/26/2010  8:03 AM
this is a surprise. who wouldn't want a guy that's won 10 rings?
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/26/2010  8:07 AM
Phil Jackson=Over rated.

Sorry, Phil - appreciate what you did for this franchise, but winning titles when you've had the single best player in the league doesn't really count as a mega achievement.

And as much as I have laid hate MDA, Phil is literally on his last league, or hip- there is no way I'd want him here, because it would probably be for a year at most, and chances are his heart & mind wouldn't be fully invested in the challenge.

fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/26/2010  8:16 AM
franco12 wrote:Phil Jackson=Over rated.

Sorry, Phil - appreciate what you did for this franchise, but winning titles when you've had the single best player in the league doesn't really count as a mega achievement.

And as much as I have laid hate MDA, Phil is literally on his last league, or hip- there is no way I'd want him here, because it would probably be for a year at most, and chances are his heart & mind wouldn't be fully invested in the challenge.


1000% agree. Not only did he have the single best but he usually had 2 of the top 5. Shaq/Kobe were both top 5 player. Jordan/Pippin were certainly close. If not top 5 top 10 for sure.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71293
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/26/2010  10:01 AM

Dude has 10 rings. You don't win without Great players.

Red Aurbach was over rated too? Dude had HOF players like they they were skittles.

Riles is over rated. Yep, team was already championship caliber.

Larry Brown is over rated by most. Doc Rivers has 3 hof's. He must be over reated.

Look at all the teams that have won and you mostly find the best players.

So I guess having a great coach really does not matter? Its the coaches fault when they don't win but the players influence when they do?

YOu guys are very funny somtimes.

10 rings makes him the top dog. No one better. No coach won as much. Dude also wins with Reezy, with Luke Walton and Rick Fox! Dude wins with retreads, out casts, role players along side thos great players. Dude was a key component to make Jordan epic. JOrdan win before or after Jax? Jordan have an system he trusted before? Was pippin that great or great with the system? HOw many coaches have the balls to make him a "point forward"? How many coaches draw up championship winning plays that have scubs winning the game and not Jordan/Pippin? How many can take a team with Will Purdue or Bill Wennington as your center?

Or was it the Charles Oakley for Cartwright trade that did it?

sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
5/26/2010  11:19 AM
There is nobody in the league I hate more than that sellout Phil Jackson. Hes such a smug, condescending a-hole and while I take nothing away from his accomplishments, because they speak for themselves, he's never won a chip without having an extreme talent advantage. Never.

I might be in the minority but I want to beat him, not have him join us.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
5/26/2010  11:29 AM
He has ten rings. To say he's overrated is naive, even if he had great players. Perhaps he's remarkable with his people skills and was able to get through to these guys with enormous egos, and got them to buy into his plan. Does that not say something about Phil? How about his defensive philosophy? Were his teams not sound enough defensively to win ten championships? Another thing, anybody ever notice that the Lakers suddenly looked like just a very good team, as opposed to a championship team, as soon as it became Kobes team? Instead of Phils team?

He deserves his place.

“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Nalod
Posts: 71293
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/26/2010  11:44 AM
sebstar wrote:There is nobody in the league I hate more than that sellout Phil Jackson. Hes such a smug, condescending a-hole and while I take nothing away from his accomplishments, because they speak for themselves, he's never won a chip without having an extreme talent advantage. Never.

I might be in the minority but I want to beat him, not have him join us.

Phil was a knick. HE should be OUR smug, condescending a-hole!

My hope is when MDA wins his ring he fits that bill. He certainly has it in him.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/26/2010  11:58 AM
Part of LeBron's legacy will be to win multiple titles without Phil Jackson. Kobe and Jordan will always have that they couldn't win without Phil they are forever tied to each other. Well if LeBron wins championships in NYC he will be the one superstar to do it without Phil Jackson and that would add to his legacy. There is something to be said to winning championships in different manner.
Nalod
Posts: 71293
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/26/2010  12:02 PM
Vmart wrote:Part of LeBron's legacy will be to win multiple titles without Phil Jackson. Kobe and Jordan will always have that they couldn't win without Phil they are forever tied to each other. Well if LeBron wins championships in NYC he will be the one superstar to do it without Phil Jackson and that would add to his legacy. There is something to be said to winning championships in different manner.

That does bring up a good point, Kobe and Jordan both had this guy as a coach. Outside of Wilts physical dominance these two MIGHT be the two best players ever, and both were not UNTIL they got Jax as the coach.

Maybe its the coach, not the player?

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/26/2010  12:10 PM
Nalod wrote:
Dude has 10 rings. You don't win without Great players.

Red Aurbach was over rated too? Dude had HOF players like they they were skittles.

Riles is over rated. Yep, team was already championship caliber.

Larry Brown is over rated by most. Doc Rivers has 3 hof's. He must be over reated.

Look at all the teams that have won and you mostly find the best players.

So I guess having a great coach really does not matter? Its the coaches fault when they don't win but the players influence when they do?

YOu guys are very funny somtimes.

10 rings makes him the top dog. No one better. No coach won as much. Dude also wins with Reezy, with Luke Walton and Rick Fox! Dude wins with retreads, out casts, role players along side thos great players. Dude was a key component to make Jordan epic. JOrdan win before or after Jax? Jordan have an system he trusted before? Was pippin that great or great with the system? HOw many coaches have the balls to make him a "point forward"? How many coaches draw up championship winning plays that have scubs winning the game and not Jordan/Pippin? How many can take a team with Will Purdue or Bill Wennington as your center?

Or was it the Charles Oakley for Cartwright trade that did it?

Red is over rated- and I had him.

Riley, not over rated, except maybe in his own mind. He won with Showtime - and had to get through an equally stacked Celtic team when they did win.

LB - he's just nuts.

Doc? Underrated- loved him in orlando- thought he got a lot out of a squad with no talent.

The way I look at a coach - talent being equal, who gets more out of the same theoretical group of players?

Scott Skiles vs. MDA? I'm taking Skiles.

Brooks vs. MDA? I'm taking Brooks.

Don Chaney vs. MDA? I'm taking Chaney, and I hated his offense.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/26/2010  12:25 PM
Red Auerbach was a builder of teams too! So I give him more credit.

MDA doesn't have to be the the greatest coach for all situations. He's a system guy and not a traditional coach but you can win a ton with a system too, you just need a GM that will work to give him what he needs. Phil is winding down. It's not worth investing in the guy if his heart isn't in it.

Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/26/2010  1:31 PM
I have a very interesting take on Phil Jackson and his success. I was in India one day in a small village and towards the evening the farmers would go to the village center and bring their water buffalo's for milking. I noticed this woman that came with her water buffalo and her calf she was carrying the calf. The calf of the water buffalo died three years ago it was stuffed. The mother water buffalo thought her calf was still alive and as a result would produce milk for the calf.

I know the human mind is far advanced and knows the difference when something is dead or gone. With Phil on the sideline players buy into what he has to say, basically his past accomplishments helps to sell his aura. Players buy into it play hard for him, this has a lot to do with one having talent and at the same time the players knowing that he has done it many times before. I'm sure there are better coaches out there than Phil he always has a superstar and superstars are always self motivated. My theory is if there were no Jordan would Phil have won with Kobe? You can have a stuffed Michael Jordan and the players will play hard for Phil Jackson. Just like when Riley came to the Knicks the confidence grew ten folds in the fans and the players knowing that a proven winner was coming to the Knicks. Same thing with Phil Jackson going to the Lakers they were a great team before he got there and it was just the confidence of him being there put them over the top. MDA all he has to do is get one with LeBron and multiple championships will follow.

Nalod
Posts: 71293
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
5/26/2010  3:25 PM
Lakers before phil was a great team?

Bulls before Jax were great?

Riley was promoted after Magic pulled a diva act one year removed from a championship season coached by Paul Westhead. Westhead and Magic did not see eye to eye and they bought in Riles to do a Van Gundy and quiet things down. Dude walked into a championship caliber team already molded.

All great players have to buy into a system and belief to succeed. If not, the players prove not so great. Phil Jax also does not have to put up with management second guessing him either. Kobe understands thru experience what phil can do for a team.

Superstar players when they trust the coach and the system can do wonders. MIke brown coached 5 years and thats about the time its time to move on. Larry Brown felt a team will tire a coach after an amount of time. Coaches burn out also.

what Phil had done in his time is remarkable!

The results speak for themselves.

MDA has better record than Skiles. Skiles walked into a nice situation with Milwaukee.

DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

5/26/2010  4:00 PM
franco12 wrote:Phil Jackson=Over rated.

Sorry, Phil - appreciate what you did for this franchise, but winning titles when you've had the single best player in the league doesn't really count as a mega achievement.

And as much as I have laid hate MDA, Phil is literally on his last league, or hip- there is no way I'd want him here, because it would probably be for a year at most, and chances are his heart & mind wouldn't be fully invested in the challenge.

Hey pal
I would say maybe slight so slightly overrated
Lakers got Shaq in 1996 to Join Kobe Bryant. The coaches then Del Harris, then Bill Berta and
Kurt Rambis (interim) didnt win, until LA got Phil Jackson 1999 to 2000.

When Bulls had MJordan & got Pippen in 1987, coaches Doug Collins & Stan Albeck didnt win title
Bulls won in 1991 four yrs after Pippen joined & P.Jackson became coach in 1989.
All in all I'd always undercut Jackson whom had to win with superstars.
But he's a coach. His stats proved he done well regardless of how it came about.

I used to not give him credit but I give him credit now.
Not any old coach can manage MJ/Pippen OR Shaq/Kobe. Something to be said for that!

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

5/26/2010  4:10 PM
You seem to forget than Phil Jackson said recently he would still coach the knicks even
though he plan to retire in few yrs, he always claimed Red Holzman was a mentor and was
main reason he can see a posibility down the road.

Unfortunately Knicks J.Dolan aint so warm & aint so smart and would never get or give Phil
Action Jackson what he needed to come in here and control things to turn Knicks fortune.

Whole NBA world from coaches, players & even Marv Alber seeing what I and some fans knew
for years that J Dolan is a fool's fool and not well liked in professional ownership realms
he is a good reason folks turn away from Knicks or you have few players respectively Oakley,
Mark Jackson and even Patrick Ewing take some swipe rags and shots at Knicks since organzition
led by Dolan made alot of folks whom were part of Knicks tradition feel crappy later on.

Marv Albert may have not been all correct 100% but he wasnt all wrong either !
Its foolish to believe guys like Marv Albert and player Walt Frazier were not only Knick fans
but preached NYK in their blood through the years.

No important Knicks has even been used as consultants OR given decent considerations for coming
home to NYK for job in organization to put Knick Pride back where it belongs.

You think MDA (whom I like) and his $5mil contract cares as much other than he makes lots $$$
and fairly has the time to build team. At least MDA can go out get himself a coaching staff
with defense or rebounding coaches to further increase Knicks development. Think MDA likes the
NY Broadway gala as much as Jay-Z and Lebron James.

NO one can say Dolan has done a fine job regarding the Knicks we know and any kind of play
into turning an organization around and become relevant again. Nope not ever, NO One !

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

5/26/2010  4:16 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/26/2010  4:27 PM
Nalod wrote:
Dude has 10 rings. You don't win without Great players.

Red Aurbach was over rated too? Dude had HOF players like they they were skittles.

Riles is over rated. Yep, team was already championship caliber.

Larry Brown is over rated by most. Doc Rivers has 3 hof's. He must be over reated.

Look at all the teams that have won and you mostly find the best players.

So I guess having a great coach really does not matter? Its the coaches fault when they don't win but the players influence when they do?

YOu guys are very funny somtimes.

10 rings makes him the top dog. No one better. No coach won as much. Dude also wins with Reezy, with Luke Walton and Rick Fox! Dude wins with retreads, out casts, role players along side thos great players. Dude was a key component to make Jordan epic. JOrdan win before or after Jax? Jordan have an system he trusted before? Was pippin that great or great with the system? HOw many coaches have the balls to make him a "point forward"? How many coaches draw up championship winning plays that have scubs winning the game and not Jordan/Pippin? How many can take a team with Will Purdue or Bill Wennington as your center?

Or was it the Charles Oakley for Cartwright trade that did it?

I agree with you 150%
I used to knock Phil Jackson and I still dont like him since he isnt on our team and
from them old Knick-Bull nasty playoff series.

However I cant knock Phil anymore.
You're right you win with good Players or 1-2 hall of fame types or close to it,
surrounding them with right guys.

Fact is Owner James Dolan more concern with 2 things.
1) making profits at gate OR playoff revenues.
(so happy this fool is feeling pinch or NYK Missing playoffs what is it? 7 yrs now?)

2) Dolan feels its more important to like someone, like a player or employee or a coach
better than it is than to win a NBA title. Reason Dolan exiled L.Sprewell outta here
faster than speed of light.

Dolan loved embattled coach Don Chaney so much he kept him here longer than his stay
to be booed every MSG Knick home game for a pathetic knick team then. Poor Chaney did
not deserve that. But Dolan loved Don Chaney.

These things are vital to Dolan, he rather make $$$money and like you than win titles.
If he didnt make $$$ or didnt like you you're gone! Simple as that.

Dolan aint even gonna play in the new Superbowl plans & Pardners and its sub-associates
for NY Superbowl 2014.

That is how bad it is for Mr Dolan our Knick owner.
Same Dolan whom refused Hall of Famer Magic Ervin Johnson a seat at Knicks home game since
Magic ripped' Dolan's friend Zeke Thomas in new book Johnson had.

Good guy Mr Dolan is, he rather deny superstars seats at MSG/Knick home games than actually
see Knicks winning games. Go figure !

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
DJMUSIC
Posts: 22906
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/30/2007
Member: #1283

5/26/2010  4:21 PM
nixluva wrote:Red Auerbach was a builder of teams too! So I give him more credit.

MDA doesn't have to be the the greatest coach for all situations. He's a system guy and not a traditional coach but you can win a ton with a system too, you just need a GM that will work to give him what he needs. Phil is winding down. It's not worth investing in the guy if his heart isn't in it.

Dont knock down Phil
first of all he honors Red Holzman. If NYK was lucky to have Jackson for even 1-2 yrs believe me
Jackson ain't coming here to lose. Nope no never happen regardless of the money.

Now players whom know the deal would come over to play for Phil J perhaps easier than what we
hear with on Mike DAntoni. Folks says Mike is great especially those from Olympics.

I dont see any S.Nashes, or J.Johnsons or greater stars whom proclaim so much jumping running to
NewYork cause of MDA.

Phil Jackson is another story whom Lebron already says he would love to play for.
I'd bet Wade would feel same way.

Turntable Musiclover & Mix-Master-ologist
It would never happen but I'd love to replaced MDA with LAL Phil Jackson

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy