franco12 wrote:SupremeCommander wrote:Joe Johnson... I'd rather buy the proven difference maker than overpay for porential
Really? I think Joe has shown that when it matters most, he can come up really small.
I think it was the last year in the Heat series - he was silent until the last game when they basically blew the heat out.
And then against the cavs - he was their leading scorer once, and likewise, put up pretty lame numbers.
Certainly not the numbers of someone who has proven anything - except that he can put up stats in the regular season.
Sorry, if we're maxing someone out, either it should be a young player who we can argue has upside, or if its an older player, they need to have proven they deserve it.
Joe Johnson on the Knicks at a max deal is another allan houston.
1) I never said Joe Johnson at a max deal--but even then him at a max deal is better value than Rudy gay at a max deal. Johnson at the same terms is better value than Gay without a doubt
2) I didn't mean difference maker in the Micheal Jordan sense of the word. I meant it in the he's the best player on one of the best teams in the league (albeit a second tier team). But he's at least been a key contributor on a couple of very good teams whereas what exactly has Rudy Gay done? Anyone?
3) signing Rudy Gay to a contract of equal terms to Joe Johnson (because I assume that's what we're talking about here) is how you end up "paying for potential" and getting stuck with a Jamal Crawford/LaMarcus Aldridge type contract