earthmansurfer wrote:JohnWallace44 wrote:Two thirds of the picks selected after Gallo are now better than him especially in terms of value.
You must be kidding? Gallo is playing great for a rookie, which he essentially is. Last I checked Lopez' team is going for the record of worst record in NBA history. "2/3 of the picks selected after now Gallo are better than him ESPECIALLY in terms of value." Please, go into the details here, we are dying to know...
One year under his belt and he is already one of our best defenders not to mention best shooters. He just isn't taking many shots, got to give him some time here... (rookie wall was hit but he's been getting better lately).
I don't think he is kidding, and that kills any credibility he might have, IMO. I looked at the draft, and it is not bad one, but there is no reason to believe that Gallinari can't improve enough to justify his draft slot.
You can make a case that if Gallo matures physically/gets stronger and his back holds up, he can be a better pick than Beasley, Mayo, Love (They have all had some moments so far in their respective careers, but Gallo can hold his own talentwise with them.), and most other picks in his draft class.
Gallo was, IMO, a legit pick for the Knicks, although I think you can make a case that Lopez could have fit in here also. The two teams who really blew it in that draft were Miami and Minny. Both of them should have picked up Lopez, expecially Miami, since Beasley is not really a PF and he can't seem to play consistent D. And Minny could have moved Jefferson to his natural position if they had taken Lopez- giving them a pretty decent front court.
At the very least, Gallo is "in the mix," now when you discuss the better players who came out of his draft, and this was something none of us could have talked about last year.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee