[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

from the smoldering ashes: a new beginning?
Author Thread
Nalod
Posts: 71761
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/10/2010  10:03 AM

I remember watching the yankees and Redsox a few years ago. The year when the Sawx came back to win 3 straight (or was it four?).

When the yankees were up the announcer said no team had ever come back from such a deficet and the odds were not in their favor. I turned to my wife and said "you know hon, isn't the odds actually imporove the longer a team DOES not do this?" "Its just a matter of time until a team does it!"

The Sawx came back and on to the world series.

It sucked from a NY perspective and I wasn't rooting for them but it was a cool thing to behold.

I was not saying that was going to happen, it just thought it was just a matter of time until it did.

Lets face it, the knicks suck. But is it really that important that we finish strong to attract players of Lebrons caliber? Other than having no pick in 2012, we have some decent pieces and enough cap room.

I know what everyone is writing about it not looking good but isn't the current situation not very relevant to the future? Is it because we can't see it therefore it does not possibly exist?

I read dudes talking about things that nobody could possibly know even the principles involved.

One spark could turn this franchise around. ONe turn of events.

Walsh cleared the cap with resolve and determination to fulfil his goal.

If we don't win a game the rest of the season really has no bearing on the future because most of our guys are gone anyway.

We don't know who's coming or what changes will behold.

But souring on this team at this moment is one thing but conjecture into the future is beyond most capabilities.

Im not saying the knicks are going to get turned around by next season and some wonderful player from Ohio is going to grace us with the honor, but one of these days someone is going to seize the opportunity and actually stop calling MSG the "Mecca" and do somthing about it.

One day knick 82 games will be more amusing than the off season!

AUTOADVERT
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/10/2010  11:00 AM
As it is, we have time for other pursuits. Time to take Kazoo lessons, or expand the ol' string collection. Time to shtupp the wife four times a day.

Yep. There's more to life than basketball.

https:// It's not so hard.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/10/2010  11:07 AM
A lot of good things can happen to and for this team. The problem is mostly bad things have happened. Ironically the good things that HAVE happened have somehow been turned into negatives.

For example David Lee.

A guy picked 30 you hope he makes the roster as a hustle player. Instead he's worked hard and turned his game into a really polished offensive player who can shoot, score in the paint, handle the ball, pass and rebound. A guy that gives you 20/12 and shoots 55%. From pick 30! My god... what team wouldnt be thrilled with that? Yet the Knick fans gripe and worry about paying him too much or focus on his defensive liabilities. Its unreal.

Not a lot else good has happened since Ewing retired, lets face it.

Knicks need some luck. They need Gallo to become a good player. They Chandler to become a good player. They need at least 2 of the Walker/Giddens/Douglas trio to be solid players.

The Knicks can rebound next year. Walsh needs to sign a couple of good players and bring back Lee. He needs to buy some picks or draft some guys thats got passed for one reason or another who are good players. Those are usually undersized later classmen who get passed for younger or more athletic players. guys like Collison, Morrow, Jameer Nelson, etc

Its impossible to be optimistic with this ownership and its history.

The Knicks were where good basketball minds go to die. Layden, Chaney, Isiah, Larry Brown, DAntoni, Walsh, Lenny Wilkins... all these guys were good NBA people at one point and had their own lists of positives they brought to the table. Every one of them failed utterly and completely. Only Walsh and MDA have any hope of redemption.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/10/2010  11:09 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/10/2010  11:09 AM
fishmike wrote:A guy picked 30 you hope he makes the roster as a hustle player. Instead he's worked hard and turned his game into a really polished offensive player who can shoot, score in the paint, handle the ball, pass and rebound. A guy that gives you 20/12 and shoots 55%. From pick 30! My god... what team wouldnt be thrilled with that? Yet the Knick fans gripe and worry about paying him too much or focus on his defensive liabilities. Its unreal.

As long as he's wearing Knicks uniform, he's gonna suck.

https:// It's not so hard.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/10/2010  12:06 PM
"The Knicks were where good basketball minds go to die. Layden, Chaney, Isiah, Larry Brown, DAntoni, Walsh, Lenny Wilkins... all these guys were good NBA people at one point and had their own lists of positives they brought to the table. Every one of them failed utterly and completely. Only Walsh and MDA have any hope of redemption."


fish.mike - the only thing your list of basketball minds has in common is the franchise ownership. Unless the Dolan family has empowered Donnie Walsh with an unusual amount of autonomy, authority and PATIENCE, there will be more pain and suffering.

The Knicks return to excellence will require at LEAST three more years of wandering in the wilderness, and commitment to Walsh, because these things take time. There is no precedent for the current strategy, missing a high lottery selection. None. When the Knicks had a moderate amount of flexibility twenty years ago, they also had the building block of Patrick Ewing.

The building blocks, while encouraging, are unproven. The best assets the Knicks own are Lee, Gallo and The Mayor. That's it.

Pine Brothers? I like Bill Miller and Toney Douglas for their toughness. Sergio pushes the ball. I'm wid that. Everyone else can take a hike.

No other franchise will help the Knicks. Quite the opposite, each team will do anything within their power to hold on to assets. Cleveland, Miami and even Toronto - will no let stars walk away without putting up resistance.

Donnie Walsh Needs At Least Three Things Need To Happen

1. one top tier free agent to leave his current environment, persuaded by money and the allure of the big city...

2. ... a Summer League surprise and

3. ... some serendipity and outright blind luck in the second round of the NBA draft

once a knick always a knick
skeng
Posts: 22090
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 10/27/2009
Member: #2959
Denmark
3/10/2010  12:12 PM
Are there any billionaires here on UK? One of them could buy the team from Dolan the Douche.. Or we could all chip in? Seems that would solve some problems
Legalize di NBA
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/10/2010  12:16 PM
misterearl wrote:

The Knicks return to excellence will require at LEAST three more years of wandering in the wilderness, and commitment to Walsh, because these things take time.

what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it.

Nalod
Posts: 71761
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/10/2010  12:17 PM

Luck: when preperation and opportunity colide.

We prepared by clearing cap. Now we have opportunity.

Thats what Walsh's plan has been.

We are in a position to succeed. Thats an improvement.

Lets keep this a "Briggs free zone". No offense dude, you got 10 threads why things could go wrong and I don't dispute them. This is a "things can go right" thread and we need a ray of hope.

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/10/2010  12:31 PM
Marv wrote:
misterearl wrote:

The Knicks return to excellence will require at LEAST three more years of wandering in the wilderness, and commitment to Walsh, because these things take time.

what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it.

training camp. If he whiffs on free agents he can still use the space to make some good trades. Those wouldnt until right before the season starts
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/10/2010  12:35 PM
fishmike wrote:
Marv wrote:
misterearl wrote:

The Knicks return to excellence will require at LEAST three more years of wandering in the wilderness, and commitment to Walsh, because these things take time.

what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it.

training camp. If he whiffs on free agents he can still use the space to make some good trades. Those wouldnt until right before the season starts

ha! this is like negotiating a divorce. i get the serving tray!

ok. training camp. but you pick up the orthodonture.

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/10/2010  12:44 PM
I agree.. we gotta see something. You cant trade picks and players that should be building blocks for your future for cap space or flexibility then have nothing to show for it at the end of the year. We can not afford to lose 50 games again next year. YOU KNOW with our luck the Rockets get Yao back and win 65 games or some crap and we lose 60 games. Phucks sakes.

You have to figure we at least get Joe Johnson. I'm one of the few around here that like his game (4 time all star). The question is who else and what else.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
3/10/2010  12:56 PM
I'm with you on the smoldering ashes, but I'm not seeing the new beginning. Just the same song.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Nalod
Posts: 71761
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/10/2010  2:32 PM
sebstar wrote:I'm with you on the smoldering ashes, but I'm not seeing the new beginning. Just the same song.

Yes, nobody can see thru the haze. Only speculate.

Its easy to see whats obvious and project into the future.

The goal was create opportunity. Thats what we look forward to.

If failure to execute then we'll deal with that.

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/10/2010  2:41 PM
one mantra since 2008 - get cap space to sign 2 max players.

mission accomplished.

the clock starts again on july 1st.

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
3/10/2010  3:05 PM
Sheesh Marv

"what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it."

Not so fast Marv. djsunyc is correct, July 2010 is only the first day of another cycle. March 10, 2011 should provide enough evidence whether the Knicks are headed to the first round of the playoffs or back to the draft lottery.

Not a day sooner.

once a knick always a knick
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/10/2010  4:30 PM
misterearl wrote:Sheesh Marv

"what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it."

Not so fast Marv. djsunyc is correct, July 2010 is only the first day of another cycle. March 10, 2011 should provide enough evidence whether the Knicks are headed to the first round of the playoffs or back to the draft lottery.

Not a day sooner.

once again, donnie gave away hill, a #1 and swapped a #1 for the sole purpose of shedding jeffries' contract by 7/1/10. if he doesn’t score big that day then he gave away huge assets that he didn’t need to. that is what i'm judging him on. i would have been fine with judging him in 2011 if he hadn't decided to roll so much of our future on this one day - 7/1/10. that’s exactly what i'm holding him to.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/10/2010  4:54 PM
Marv wrote:once again, donnie gave away hill, a #1 and swapped a #1 for the sole purpose of shedding jeffries' contract by 7/1/10. if he doesn’t score big that day then he gave away huge assets that he didn’t need to. that is what i'm judging him on. i would have been fine with judging him in 2011 if he hadn't decided to roll so much of our future on this one day - 7/1/10. that’s exactly what i'm holding him to.

That seems to be a bit twisted logic. If you're only real shot to land 2 Max guys or maybe 3 lesser All Stars, was to move Jared and Hill's money, then how can you say that he didn't need to use those assets. It's clear he did need to use the pick and Hill to get the space. This is the BIG FA market, not the next summer, THIS summer, so if you're going to roll the dice and go all in, this is the time to do that, right? So for the chance to win big you have to risk big. If he halfwayed this and fell short people would say why didn't he go all in.

simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/10/2010  4:54 PM
I agree with Marv, giving away 2 lottery picks, which is what they will be if do not get the max FAs will be a total failure of IT like proportions.

No difference between giving away 2 lottery picks for a max guy that flames out like Marbury, and giving them away for nothing in my book.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

3/10/2010  5:15 PM
Marv wrote:
misterearl wrote:Sheesh Marv

"what?? he gets exactly till 7/1/10 and not a day longer in my book. he rolled the dice on the franchise and its future on that date; let's hold him to it."

Not so fast Marv. djsunyc is correct, July 2010 is only the first day of another cycle. March 10, 2011 should provide enough evidence whether the Knicks are headed to the first round of the playoffs or back to the draft lottery.

Not a day sooner.

once again, donnie gave away hill, a #1 and swapped a #1 for the sole purpose of shedding jeffries' contract by 7/1/10. if he doesn’t score big that day then he gave away huge assets that he didn’t need to. that is what i'm judging him on. i would have been fine with judging him in 2011 if he hadn't decided to roll so much of our future on this one day - 7/1/10. that’s exactly what i'm holding him to.


There is some truth to this, because you could have kept Hill, Jeffries, and the #1s and waited for Jeffries and Curry to come off the books after next year, and still picked up a Max guy in 2010.

But, you would not have had the ability to potentially pick up someone like a James, and another big FA who would come along for the ride if James is on board, and a big FA like a James might not want to come to a team like the Knicks if the team did not have the ability to sign a sidekick FA (or two) personally chosen by him.

Our ability to pick up one of the top 3 FAs might be linked to our ability to pick up one of the top second tier FAs at the same time. No??

No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/10/2010  5:17 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/10/2010  5:18 PM
nixluva wrote:
Marv wrote:once again, donnie gave away hill, a #1 and swapped a #1 for the sole purpose of shedding jeffries' contract by 7/1/10. if he doesn’t score big that day then he gave away huge assets that he didn’t need to. that is what i'm judging him on. i would have been fine with judging him in 2011 if he hadn't decided to roll so much of our future on this one day - 7/1/10. that’s exactly what i'm holding him to.

That seems to be a bit twisted logic. If you're only real shot to land 2 Max guys or maybe 3 lesser All Stars, was to move Jared and Hill's money, then how can you say that he didn't need to use those assets. It's clear he did need to use the pick and Hill to get the space. This is the BIG FA market, not the next summer, THIS summer, so if you're going to roll the dice and go all in, this is the time to do that, right? So for the chance to win big you have to risk big. If he halfwayed this and fell short people would say why didn't he go all in.

Nix, I loved what Donnie did with craw and zach. Cleared them off of 2010 without taking on any salary beyond that and giving away no draft picks. I loved what he did with nate and dlee. Retained them for this year without giving up cap for them beyond 2010. I was fine with the duhon signing, Harrington trade, Hughes trade, etc for the same reason. He could have gone into 2010 with enough room to sign lebron, wade, dirk, bosh, or amare, added that max fa to hill, gallo, chandler et al, added players in 2011 when curry and Jeffries came off, AND had our #1 picks in 2011 and 2012.

contrast that with our current situation. Now, if Donnie doesn’t score 2 top fa’s in 2010, we’re in the same boat MINUS hill and 2 number 1’s. plus who knows if he feels forced to fill that cap room on lower level players to justify giving up so much.

I really cannot see any justification for the trade UNLESS he already knows 2 top fa’s have committed. Why risk putting us so far behind the curve when we could have been FINE without this move? And when he’s been so cautious and careful to not f**k the future until this point?

from the smoldering ashes: a new beginning?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy