AnubisADL wrote:So you want to trade for Bynum when our coach will have him rotting on the bench?

And fork over 6yrs/$78mil to Lee but all of a sudden he's talk himself into talking that down to 6yrs/$60mil. BRIGGS would have our franchise in such a CLUSTERSTARFUCH... except maxed out 2-3 X above the not the Cap but Luxury Tax. And no Playoffs

TMS wrote:or we could try & draft a C like Bynum using 1 of our future draft picks... oops, nevermind.

seriously tho, i don't think Lakers would take any package of assets we have to offer at this point... besides we don't even own the rights to our 2011 pick anymore, Houston has the swap rights... a deal like this couldn't even be consummated until after the draft & we make our selection... right now we have nothing but our cap space to try & patch together a team this summer... D Lee possibly could be used in a sign & trade for another pending FA like Bosh or Amare... other than that, be ready for the Marcus Camby to NY reports & T-Mac wants to remain a Knick stories to pop up in a few months.

Bynum would almost have no mobility in our offense and no use in general.

For the record BRIGGS has suggested

Monta Ellis who makes about $10-12mil/yr

Bynum who makes about $10-12mil/yr

Tyrus Thomas new deal making about $10-12mil/yr

Al Jefferson who makes about $12-14mil/yr

Lee new deal making about $10-12mil/yr

It's more than obvious he has no clue what the hell is going on....

TMS wrote:i agree, MDA would never want a C like Bynum for his system... he'd be gizzing over someone like Mehmet Okur who would float around on the perimeter & launch 3's all day tho.

While not playing a lick of D...... and if Gallo doesn't show some consistent fortitude this is the path he's headed down. Defensively Gallo has of late been getting after it, but I'm not quite sure of his sustaining it.

TMS wrote:i agree, MDA would never want a C like Bynum for his system... he 'd be is gizzing over someone like Mehmet Okur who would float around on the perimeter & launch 3's all day tho.

There.

BRIGGS wrote:Who do you want Camby????

Just something stupid for a second--first off where is this Al Jefferseon stuff coming from-- 3 years ago? People make sht up--go find me that thread if it was ever made.

If I was able to keep Lee and trade for Bynum--you could not come up with a better suggestion.
Bynum is a 20-10-2.5 C when HE is the C Lee moves back to PF and would still be 17-11 57%

Id rather have Bynum than almost any fa after Bosh wade and LBJ.

Finally Trueblue's third alias comes out! These posters get banne and come back--were not stupid trueblue!

You are right Briggs. Problem is D'Antoni does not see it that way. That and People are tired of trading picks for now.

WindsorPl wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Who do you want Camby????

Just something stupid for a second--first off where is this Al Jefferseon stuff coming from-- 3 years ago? People make sht up--go find me that thread if it was ever made.

If I was able to keep Lee and trade for Bynum--you could not come up with a better suggestion.
Bynum is a 20-10-2.5 C when HE is the C Lee moves back to PF and would still be 17-11 57%

Id rather have Bynum than almost any fa after Bosh wade and LBJ.

Finally Trueblue's third alias comes out! These posters get banne and come back--were not stupid trueblue!

You are right Briggs. Problem is D'Antoni does not see it that way. That and People are tired of trading picks for now.

Any poster who says they wouldnt want Andrew Bynum doesnt know basketball.

BRIGGS wrote:

WindsorPl wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Who do you want Camby????

Just something stupid for a second--first off where is this Al Jefferseon stuff coming from-- 3 years ago? People make sht up--go find me that thread if it was ever made.

If I was able to keep Lee and trade for Bynum--you could not come up with a better suggestion.
Bynum is a 20-10-2.5 C when HE is the C Lee moves back to PF and would still be 17-11 57%

Id rather have Bynum than almost any fa after Bosh wade and LBJ.

Finally Trueblue's third alias comes out! These posters get banne and come back--were not stupid trueblue!

You are right Briggs. Problem is D'Antoni does not see it that way. That and People are tired of trading picks for now.

Any poster who says they wouldnt want Andrew Bynum doesnt know basketball.

Didn't dj post something about Nate McMillan saying that MDA told him that centers slow the game down. If Lopez is MDA's nemesis then Bynum would be his arch nemesis for sure.

"you disgust me in so many ways. You know I'm outta here at the end of the year"

Pharzeone wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

WindsorPl wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Who do you want Camby????

Just something stupid for a second--first off where is this Al Jefferseon stuff coming from-- 3 years ago? People make sht up--go find me that thread if it was ever made.

If I was able to keep Lee and trade for Bynum--you could not come up with a better suggestion.
Bynum is a 20-10-2.5 C when HE is the C Lee moves back to PF and would still be 17-11 57%

Id rather have Bynum than almost any fa after Bosh wade and LBJ.

Finally Trueblue's third alias comes out! These posters get banne and come back--were not stupid trueblue!

You are right Briggs. Problem is D'Antoni does not see it that way. That and People are tired of trading picks for now.

Any poster who says they wouldnt want Andrew Bynum doesnt know basketball.

Didn't dj post something about Nate McMillan saying that MDA told him that centers slow the game down. If Lopez is MDA's nemesis then Bynum would be his arch nemesis for sure.

"you disgust me in so many ways. You know I'm outta here at the end of the year"

Bynum in the east with Lee at PF would be a terror. Bynum would command a double team and Lee Gallo and whoever else was on our team could play off that with wide open looks. Bynum would compensate for Lee's D--and if we did a deal like that--we would still have 16.5mm to spread out to balance the team

For example

Bynum would cost us 10mm if we dumped Chandler and Douglas
Lee at 6 yrs 60mm starts at 8.75mm

We could do this and still have room for LBJ. Do you think LBJ would be more enticed by having Bynum here and Lee resigned?

WindsorPl wrote:

Pharzeone wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

WindsorPl wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Who do you want Camby????

Just something stupid for a second--first off where is this Al Jefferseon stuff coming from-- 3 years ago? People make sht up--go find me that thread if it was ever made.

If I was able to keep Lee and trade for Bynum--you could not come up with a better suggestion.
Bynum is a 20-10-2.5 C when HE is the C Lee moves back to PF and would still be 17-11 57%

Id rather have Bynum than almost any fa after Bosh wade and LBJ.

Finally Trueblue's third alias comes out! These posters get banne and come back--were not stupid trueblue!

You are right Briggs. Problem is D'Antoni does not see it that way. That and People are tired of trading picks for now.

Any poster who says they wouldnt want Andrew Bynum doesnt know basketball.

Didn't dj post something about Nate McMillan saying that MDA told him that centers slow the game down. If Lopez is MDA's nemesis then Bynum would be his arch nemesis for sure.

"you disgust me in so many ways. You know I'm outta here at the end of the year"

I wonder what Shaq is whispering in Lebron's ears about D'Antoni.

How many championships have you won Mike? I have 4--you win with the big man.