[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

ESPN Toying with us (Bron, Wade, Bosh all in NY)
Author Thread
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/25/2010  7:23 PM

Blueprint for an NBA dynasty

Crazy? Sure. But think of all the possibilities in a LeBron/D-Wade/Bosh combo.

By Gene Wojciechowski
ESPN.com


How rich is LeBron James? Put it this way: When God needs some walking-around money, he borrows it from LBJ.

Dwyane Wade isn't exactly slumming, himself. Some people donate to a church; Wade bought a church for his minister mom.

And although Chris Bosh isn't in the same endorsement orbit as King James and D-Wade, he's still pushing $60 million in career salary earnings. So it's not as if Bosh is ordering the 89-cent, five-layer burrito from Denise.

LeBron, Wade and Bosh have money, lots of it. What they don't have is an NBA jewelry collection. Of their combined 30 fingers, only one has actually had an NBA championship ring wrapped around it.

Wade won his title in 2006, but the Miami Heat haven't sniffed a playoff-series win since then. James' Cleveland Cavaliers reached the Finals in 2007 -- and got swept. Bosh's Toronto Raptors have been to the postseason twice but haven't made it out of the first round.

All that could change if James, Wade and Bosh decide to put dynasties over dollars, basketball legacies over bank accounts. They just need a dotted line and some stones as big as the ones in Olympic curling.

As ridiculous as it sounds, there exists a scenario in which these three guys could play on the same team and win championships happily ever after starting next season. For once, someone could say, "It's not about the money," and actually mean it.

As you probably noticed, the recent NBA trade deadline isn't just about trading players. It's usually about trading contracts, preferably the expiring kind. It's white-flag economics, where teams essentially admit Steven Seagal has a better chance of winning an Oscar than they do of competing for a championship. So they start dumping salaries into the league's Port-o-Potty.

Four teams did a lot of flushing in recent weeks: the New York Knicks, Chicago Bulls, Sacramento Kings and the Los Angeles Clippers. (What? Donald Sterling? Go cheap?) And three other franchises also can stretch their legs when it comes to salary-cap space: the Heat, New Jersey Nets and Minnesota Timberwolves.

Without going all capology on you, it looks as though next season's projected salary cap will be between $50.4 million and $53.6 million. Now compare that to the financial wiggle room those seven teams have in 2010-11.

Right now, the Knicks are on the hook for only $18.6 million in contracts next season. The Nets are committed to just $26.6 million worth of deals, while the Heat are at $30.7 million, the Bulls at $31.9 million, the Clippers at $33.5 million, the Kings at $33.9 million and the T-Wolves at $35.2 million.

The numbers could change by July, but at least this gives you an idea of who has the most money to make a run at one of the great unrestricted free-agent classes in NBA history.

From a pure salary standpoint, there's no reason James, Wade and Bosh should bolt. If they max out with their teams, they'll get six-year deals with 10.5 percent annual salary increases. If they move, they'll get only five-year deals at a lower annual increase rate of 8 percent. LeBron could leave $30 million on the table if he ditches the Cavs.

I'd ditch them. If you're really serious about creating a brand and a basketball legacy, do something that's never been done before. Don't max out; min out.

Depending on the final salary-cap numbers, the Knicks could have about $33 million to spend on free agents in the summer. Under normal circumstances, that's enough to offer, say, James a max deal and then fill in the roster holes with whatever is left over.

But if James, Wade and Bosh truly want to make history, they could do the unthinkable and split the Knicks' $33 million three ways. It would cost them salary money, but can you imagine how much they'd make on the back end if they started reeling in NBA titles? In New York?

Whatever they'd lose on their paycheck stubs, they'd make up in endorsements. And it's not as if they're filing simple federal tax returns these days. According to a 2009 Forbes analysis, LeBron earned about $42.4 million in salary and endorsements -- more than Britney Spears, Jay-Z or Tom Cruise and almost as much as Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie combined.

Wade was No. 12 on Sports Illustrated's 2009 Fortunate 50, earning $26.4 million in salary and endorsements. Bosh didn't make the top 50, but he is making $15.7 million from the Raptors this season.

Anyway, they all can afford to do something daring. Just think: James, Wade and Bosh at Madison Square Garden.

Seriously, who would touch them? Wade at guard. LeBron at point forward. Bosh in the post or on the wing. Three good guys who could handle the New York media. Three seven-year veterans who understand you get only so many chances to hug the Larry O'Brien Trophy. Three singular players who know careers are defined by championships, not just checkbooks.

Dream Team Jr. could get by on about $11 million each, couldn't it? Yeah, they'd take a cut in pay, but they'd get a raise in title runs.

Don't say no just yet, fellas. And whatever you do, don't tell your agents. (They'll melt like the gestapo guy in "Raiders of the Lost Ark.")

Instead, close your eyes and think about ticker-tape parades, victory cigars and championship rings the size of clementines. Now try to put a price tag on it.

I'll save you the trouble. You can't.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/25/2010  7:24 PM
and, Also....:


Assuming McGrady took this veteran minimum in 2010-2011, the Knicks would still hold his full Bird Rights the following season and, using his Bird exception, could sign him to a large new contract starting in the 2011-2012 season (up to and including the maximum salary).

And this scenario could hold an additional and greater benefit for the Knicks. Coming off a veteran minimum contract, McGrady would have a cap hold in July 2011 of less than $1 million. With such a small cap hold, the Knicks would not need to renounce McGrady’s rights in order to use most all of the cap room the team is slated to have when Eddy Curry’s five-year contract expires in 2011 with a final-season salary of $11.3 million. The Knicks would be able to sign one or more free-agents using their cap room first, then use McGrady’s Bird exception to sign him to a new contract that far exceeds the NBA’s soft cap.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

2/25/2010  7:25 PM
just read that on that site... that changes the ultimate outcome... chance for it: >1%

it would be epic though

GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/25/2010  7:37 PM
posted this earlier Cos

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=34202

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/25/2010  7:52 PM
labron dresses like he's from cleveland, all that money and still looks a cool urkel
ES
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/25/2010  8:03 PM
T-Mac won't sign a 1 year veteran's minimum & risk being injured next year... he'll take a longterm extension when he can get it & if he stays healthy the rest of this season he'll definitely garner MLE offers from a buncha teams this summer... only 1 way any team signs T-Mac to a veteran's minimum & that is if he can't play out the string this season effectively & they sign him on the hope that he can make a comeback next year.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/25/2010  8:13 PM
nyk4ever wrote:posted this earlier Cos

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=34202

Whoops. Lock 'er up. Been busy shoveling on and off all day.

Probably be doing that all day tomorrow too. LOL @ 4th major blizzard this year rolling in.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/25/2010  8:16 PM
TMS wrote:T-Mac won't sign a 1 year veteran's minimum & risk being injured next year... he'll take a longterm extension when he can get it & if he stays healthy the rest of this season he'll definitely garner MLE offers from a buncha teams this summer... only 1 way any team signs T-Mac to a veteran's minimum & that is if he can't play out the string this season effectively & they sign him on the hope that he can make a comeback next year.

I doubt he would but I doubt anyone gave him more than a 3 year contract given the injury history. Some might not even want to risk 3 years. Might be 2 years, 3rd year team option. Would you lock him up that long? No way. Not knowing he could fall apart.


sidsanders wrote:just read that on that site... that changes the ultimate outcome... chance for it: >1%

it would be epic though

Yeah, more like 0% chance. Only thing I could see happening is maybe two guys coming on board starting at just a hair under the max so it could be done and signing for 3 years so we could re-up them at the max after the bird rights thing (3 years) played into our hands.

Like, if max signing here was 16.5M maybe they take 16M starting each. Something negligible like that.

No way do they each drop 5.5M starting salary just to play here as a trio. No way.

Interesting theory and you'd like to see more players consider shaving a few mil off their contract so that could happen - but it won't.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/25/2010  8:24 PM
knicks1248 wrote:labron dresses like he's from cleveland, all that money and still looks a cool urkel

you mean Steph-on Urkel

You know I gonna spin wit it
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/25/2010  8:25 PM
Cosmic wrote:
TMS wrote:T-Mac won't sign a 1 year veteran's minimum & risk being injured next year... he'll take a longterm extension when he can get it & if he stays healthy the rest of this season he'll definitely garner MLE offers from a buncha teams this summer... only 1 way any team signs T-Mac to a veteran's minimum & that is if he can't play out the string this season effectively & they sign him on the hope that he can make a comeback next year.

I doubt he would but I doubt anyone gave him more than a 3 year contract given the injury history. Some might not even want to risk 3 years. Might be 2 years, 3rd year team option. Would you lock him up that long? No way. Not knowing he could fall apart.

i would lock him up for 3 years at $15 mil this summer if we can since the cap won't be much of an issue & they're all in on the free agency plan... i think he's worth the risk at those dollars... that is assuming he can stay healthy the rest of this season, which is still a huge question mark.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
ESPN Toying with us (Bron, Wade, Bosh all in NY)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy