[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Good article on the cap
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/22/2010  11:06 AM
http://www.hoopdata.com/recent.aspx?aid=158

Larry Coon and NBA teams are projecting the cap number to be 53mm next years. With our salary structure and capholds for the remaining slots[all minimum] our salary cap number is 21.7mm which would give us basically 31.3mm to spend. The max salaries would for 2 players would be 33,137,816. As of today we would be short nearly 2mm $ to sign to max FA. We can try to buyout EC[but then there would be an additional minimum cap hold] so the buyout would have to be in the 2.5mm $ range. Is Eddy Curry going to take 2.5mm less? I don't know about that. So just getting to the two max contracts is not in our hands right now--it's in Eddy Currys hands.

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/22/2010  11:42 AM
The cap is 51% of basketball related income from the past year. This year the cap was $57.7 million, meaning basketball related income was $113.1 mil. For the cap to reduce to $53 million, basketball related income would have to fall to $103.9 mil- that's about 8.2% drop. The economy was down in 2008-2009 but I'm not 100% sure that BRI is falling that much. While it consumer related, this income tends to grow every year because of NBA expansion. As an example, the basketball related income dropped 1.7% last year. Even if we assume a 5% drop, which is more than double what happened last year, the Cap is still about 56.5 mil.

As an FYI, this is what basketball related income is composed of.

Regular season gate receipts
Broadcast rights
Exhibition game proceeds
Playoff gate receipts
Novelty, program and concession sales (at the arena and in team-identified stores within proximity of an NBA arena)
Parking
Proceeds from team sponsorships
Proceeds from team promotions
Arena club revenues
Proceeds from summer camps
Proceeds from non-NBA basketball tournaments
Proceeds from mascot and dance team appearances
Proceeds from beverage sale rights
40% of proceeds from arena signage
40% of proceeds from luxury suites
45% - 50% of proceeds from arena naming rights
Proceeds from other premium seat licenses
Proceeds received by NBA Properties, including international television, sponsorships, revenues from NBA Entertainment, the All-Star Game, the McDonald's Championship and other NBA special events.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/22/2010  11:55 AM
VDesai wrote:The cap is 51% of basketball related income from the past year. This year the cap was $57.7 million, meaning basketball related income was $113.1 mil. For the cap to reduce to $53 million, basketball related income would have to fall to $103.9 mil- that's about 8.2% drop. The economy was down in 2008-2009 but I'm not 100% sure that BRI is falling that much. While it consumer related, this income tends to grow every year because of NBA expansion. As an example, the basketball related income dropped 1.7% last year. Even if we assume a 5% drop, which is more than double what happened last year, the Cap is still about 56.5 mil.

As an FYI, this is what basketball related income is composed of.

Regular season gate receipts
Broadcast rights
Exhibition game proceeds
Playoff gate receipts
Novelty, program and concession sales (at the arena and in team-identified stores within proximity of an NBA arena)
Parking
Proceeds from team sponsorships
Proceeds from team promotions
Arena club revenues
Proceeds from summer camps
Proceeds from non-NBA basketball tournaments
Proceeds from mascot and dance team appearances
Proceeds from beverage sale rights
40% of proceeds from arena signage
40% of proceeds from luxury suites
45% - 50% of proceeds from arena naming rights
Proceeds from other premium seat licenses
Proceeds received by NBA Properties, including international television, sponsorships, revenues from NBA Entertainment, the All-Star Game, the McDonald's Championship and other NBA special events.


I'm going to go with Larry Coon on this one.

RIP Crushalot😞
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  12:07 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
VDesai wrote:The cap is 51% of basketball related income from the past year. This year the cap was $57.7 million, meaning basketball related income was $113.1 mil. For the cap to reduce to $53 million, basketball related income would have to fall to $103.9 mil- that's about 8.2% drop. The economy was down in 2008-2009 but I'm not 100% sure that BRI is falling that much. While it consumer related, this income tends to grow every year because of NBA expansion. As an example, the basketball related income dropped 1.7% last year. Even if we assume a 5% drop, which is more than double what happened last year, the Cap is still about 56.5 mil.

As an FYI, this is what basketball related income is composed of.

Regular season gate receipts
Broadcast rights
Exhibition game proceeds
Playoff gate receipts
Novelty, program and concession sales (at the arena and in team-identified stores within proximity of an NBA arena)
Parking
Proceeds from team sponsorships
Proceeds from team promotions
Arena club revenues
Proceeds from summer camps
Proceeds from non-NBA basketball tournaments
Proceeds from mascot and dance team appearances
Proceeds from beverage sale rights
40% of proceeds from arena signage
40% of proceeds from luxury suites
45% - 50% of proceeds from arena naming rights
Proceeds from other premium seat licenses
Proceeds received by NBA Properties, including international television, sponsorships, revenues from NBA Entertainment, the All-Star Game, the McDonald's Championship and other NBA special events.


I'm going to go with Larry Coon on this one.

why? Go back and read Coon's article. Nowhere does he say that $53mm is HIS estimate. He didnt crunch the #s on the cap at all, only on what the Knicks options are based on an arbitrary #.

VDesai... excellent post (the guy works for a bank crunching #s).

So while some use a pretend cap # for next year you actually put thought and insight into what defines that #. Thank you for that.

Should we ignore Stern's statement earlier this season about how the NBA revenues were exceeding expectations so far for the year?

The $53mm was a worst case scenario. Pretty clear thats not the case

http://offthedribble.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/16/behind-the-numbers-the-knicks-mcgrady-and-the-cap/#more-1769

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  12:12 PM
also the original article isnt from Coon. Its from Joe Schmoe.

"but there is much less breathing room if the cap falls below 53 million. "

That is a direct quote. Nowhere does it say that is his prediction, nor is there any evidence that the cap will drop at all, much less to $53mm

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/22/2010  12:15 PM
fishmike wrote:also the original article isnt from Coon. Its from Joe Schmoe.

"but there is much less breathing room if the cap falls below 53 million. "

That is a direct quote. Nowhere does it say that is his prediction, nor is there any evidence that the cap will drop at all, much less to $53mm

and from Des's post, the BRI would have to severely drop for it to even be 53 million. I think it's a safe bet that the cap is going to be right where we thought it would be... somewhere in the 55-57 range.

"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/22/2010  12:16 PM
3.
Larry Coon
CA
February 9th, 2010
12:19 pm
JimmyBX:

I’m well aware of when the cap is established, exactly how it’s established, who does it, the current trends in the metrics the league and teams use, and the working values they are using for their internal projections.

In 2009 the cap dropped from $58.68 million to $57.7 million, accompanied by a warning from the league to the teams of a projected revenues drop in the range of 2.5% to 5% for the 2009-10 season. This would result in a 2010-11 cap in the range of $50.4 million to $53.6 million.

Midseason returns have led to a revised projection that is in the higher end of this range, so the best estimate at this time is $53 million to $54 million. A number of teams I’ve talked to are using $53 million as their working figure, as am I.

The Knicks are currently committed to $27,336,225 for the 2010-11 season, for six players. They do not have a first round draft pick this season, so they will have a cap hold for six roster spots totaling $2,841,624, and bringing their team salary to $30,177,849. Note that this is before adding any cap holds for free agents they may wish to retain, such as David Lee, Nate Robonson, Marcus Landry, or any of their other free agents. (They would have to renounce these free agents in order to maximize their cap room.)

A $53 million estimated cap and a $30,177,849 team salary leaves $22,822,151 million in cap room, which I rounded down – both to be conservative and to account for a potential qualifying offer to restricted free agent Landry. This is how I came up with the $22 million figure I used in the article.

Finally, I refer you to the paragraph right above the one with the $22 million estimate for the Knicks, where I explained why cap room projections are nebulous at this point and indicated that these amounts are therefore estimates.

Larry Coon

Recommend Recommended by 4 Readers

RIP Crushalot😞
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
2/22/2010  12:16 PM
Bottom line, if the cap is 53, we're 1.7 mil short of signing 2max guys.
If we want two, we need the cap to be at 56 mil.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  12:33 PM
http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=mc-sternallstar021210&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Q: With ticket sales and sponsorship revenue down because of the recession, are there some owners who could actually benefit from a lockout? How does the current situation differ from [the last lockout] in 1999?

Stern: A work stoppage doesn’t benefit anybody. I think what has happened is – I don’t remember precisely the numbers – we have 10 years of numbers to sort of confirm to us that we need to have a system that can be better sustained for the business of our league, that can continue to reward our players for their extraordinary talent but can also be a model for causing our owners to make the kinds of investments that are necessary to grow our sport.

Q: Is there any danger of the NBA contracting some teams?

Stern: We don’t have any plans for contraction. I would say we’re not going to be challenged from a revenue standpoint. But we are challenged from an expense perspective. Our expenses are too high and we have to find a way to moderate them.

Briggs... that "warning" was old, and was not backed by Stern. If you look at VDesai's post the cap is based on revenue.

The cap is going to be about the same or slightly less than last years. That $53mm estimate is a worst case. The #s arent there to suggest such a drop, they just arent.

Why ignore the evidence?

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/22/2010  12:39 PM
fishmike wrote:http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news?slug=mc-sternallstar021210&prov=yhoo&type=lgns

Q: With ticket sales and sponsorship revenue down because of the recession, are there some owners who could actually benefit from a lockout? How does the current situation differ from [the last lockout] in 1999?

Stern: A work stoppage doesn’t benefit anybody. I think what has happened is – I don’t remember precisely the numbers – we have 10 years of numbers to sort of confirm to us that we need to have a system that can be better sustained for the business of our league, that can continue to reward our players for their extraordinary talent but can also be a model for causing our owners to make the kinds of investments that are necessary to grow our sport.

Q: Is there any danger of the NBA contracting some teams?

Stern: We don’t have any plans for contraction. I would say we’re not going to be challenged from a revenue standpoint. But we are challenged from an expense perspective. Our expenses are too high and we have to find a way to moderate them.

Briggs... that "warning" was old, and was not backed by Stern. If you look at VDesai's post the cap is based on revenue.

The cap is going to be about the same or slightly less than last years. That $53mm estimate is a worst case. The #s arent there to suggest such a drop, they just arent.

Why ignore the evidence?

Fishmike--did you ready Larry Coons article from last week? So fishmike is right and Larry Coon is wrong?

RIP Crushalot😞
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
2/22/2010  12:39 PM
kam77 wrote:Bottom line, if the cap is 53, we're 1.7 mil short of signing 2max guys.
If we want two, we need the cap to be at 56 mil.

If two max players had the opportunity to play together, does anyone think one or both of them wouldn't take that kind of pay cut willingly?

Anyway, I don't think we are getting two max's. We need money for a supporting cast too. Guess we could move Lee with Curry or something along those lines...

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/22/2010  12:48 PM
Article is outdated. Even using a $53M cap, there is room to sign 2 free agents. They errored 1) by miscalculating the maximum salary (it is based on the cap) and 2) by failing to subtract the caphold from the total salary after adding a max contract.

Player 2010 Salary
Eddy Curry 11,276,863.00
Danilo Gallinari 3,304,560.00
Wilson Chandler 2,130,481.00
Toney Douglas 1,071,000.00
Second Rd Draft Pick 473,604.00
Second Rd Draft Pick 473,604.00
Cap Hold 473,604.00
Cap Hold 473,604.00
Cap Hold 473,604.00
Cap Hold 473,604.00
Lebron James 15,900,000.00
Chris Bosh 15,900,000.00



Total 52,424,528.00
Salary Cap 53,000,000.00
Cap Space Available 575,472.00


PG
SG Wilson Chandler
SF Lebron James
PF Danilo Gallinari
C Chris Bosh
PG/SG Toney Douglas
SF/PF
PF/C
Bench
Bench
Bench
Bench
IR
IR
IR

You know I gonna spin wit it
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  12:48 PM
http://www.thefreelibrary.com/NBA+Ticket+Revenue+Down+Less+Than+Expected.-a0217387246

more evidence.

Cap is going to be about $1mm less if at all

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  12:54 PM
It has nothing to do with right or wrong. Its a prediction based on data. The data has changed.

The predicted cap drop was based on revenue dropping as much as 8%. Its dropped 1%. Thats the data.

Coon is working off worst case scenario that was put out there last summer. That hasnt happened.

Coon didnt even say it was HIS prediction.

You believe everything from the internet as gospel? If Kramer tells you that a company is strong (like Bear) you take that as Gospel? Dont be scared to do a little research.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/22/2010  1:29 PM
Its not even me vs. Larry Coon. The only way I came to the numbers I ran was because of Larry Coon's FAQ. From there it was simple math. THe cap dropping to $53 mil would mean an 8% drop in BRI, since the cap is based on 51% of BRI (a fact stated in Coon's FAQ). You can run the math yourself, its not that difficult. That seems like a steep drop to me, but thats an educated guess on my part. You would expect that the drop from 2007-2008 to 2008-2009 would've been steep, but it was less than a 2% drop.
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/22/2010  1:32 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/22/2010  1:33 PM
fishmike wrote:It has nothing to do with right or wrong. Its a prediction based on data. The data has changed.

The predicted cap drop was based on revenue dropping as much as 8%. Its dropped 1%. Thats the data.

Coon is working off worst case scenario that was put out there last summer. That hasnt happened.

Coon didnt even say it was HIS prediction.

You believe everything from the internet as gospel? If Kramer tells you that a company is strong (like Bear) you take that as Gospel? Dont be scared to do a little research.

A 1% drop in BRI would mean the cap would come in at about 57.1 mil.

fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  1:43 PM
VDesai wrote:
fishmike wrote:It has nothing to do with right or wrong. Its a prediction based on data. The data has changed.

The predicted cap drop was based on revenue dropping as much as 8%. Its dropped 1%. Thats the data.

Coon is working off worst case scenario that was put out there last summer. That hasnt happened.

Coon didnt even say it was HIS prediction.

You believe everything from the internet as gospel? If Kramer tells you that a company is strong (like Bear) you take that as Gospel? Dont be scared to do a little research.

A 1% drop in BRI would mean the cap would come in at about 57.1 mil.

which could be the difference in picking up Sergio's QO
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/22/2010  2:04 PM
fishmike wrote:
VDesai wrote:
fishmike wrote:It has nothing to do with right or wrong. Its a prediction based on data. The data has changed.

The predicted cap drop was based on revenue dropping as much as 8%. Its dropped 1%. Thats the data.

Coon is working off worst case scenario that was put out there last summer. That hasnt happened.

Coon didnt even say it was HIS prediction.

You believe everything from the internet as gospel? If Kramer tells you that a company is strong (like Bear) you take that as Gospel? Dont be scared to do a little research.

A 1% drop in BRI would mean the cap would come in at about 57.1 mil.

which could be the difference in picking up Sergio's QO

I think Sergio's cap hold is greater than the QO.

You know I gonna spin wit it
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/22/2010  2:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/22/2010  2:05 PM
Basically, we need to cap to come in around $56 mil and hope that either Lebron or Bosh is willing to forego $1 or $2 mil. If we can work out a S&T with Lee going to Toronto and us signing Bosh for say $14.5 starting, we should clear about $4-$5 mil to resign Sergio and house and if McGrady is willing to do a vet mininum for 1 year, we would be set.
Trust the Process
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/22/2010  2:50 PM
TheGame wrote:Basically, we need to cap to come in around $56 mil and hope that either Lebron or Bosh is willing to forego $1 or $2 mil. If we can work out a S&T with Lee going to Toronto and us signing Bosh for say $14.5 starting, we should clear about $4-$5 mil to resign Sergio and house and if McGrady is willing to do a vet mininum for 1 year, we would be set.

thas is one option. I am under the impression that we will get one max guy and use the rest to fill out the roster. If we get LBJ then I think we resign Lee, Sergio and add another big like Jermaine Oneil or Camby. If we sign a big like Amare or Bosh then I think we bring back Lee, Sergio and maybe a discount TMac if he's serious about taking less money.

Its hard to imagine LBJ, Bosh, Chandler, Gallo and a bunch of guys making $500k. But who knows how Walsh and MDA sell this.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Good article on the cap

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy