TheGame wrote:I doubt Johnson leaves Atlanta and Boozer would not really be an upgrade over Lee. I think Boozer is slightly better, but they both don't play defense or block shots (though Boozer might be slightly better than Lee on D). Boozer is not worth the money. We might as well resign Lee. If Walsh cannot get Bosh and Lebron, then the strategy failed, bottomline.
We have to remember the priority wasn't to try to score LeBron or Bosh or Wade at all costs.
The strategy was to put an end to the nightmare business practices that put us in this mess.
Isiah Thomas had a 146M payroll at one point and 23 wins. That had to stop no matter what.
So you got to keep in mind that is priority #1. Put an end to the mistakes. Restore order and financial freedom.
Now, I think some people are clouded by the fact that our day of financial freedom lines up with such a high class of free agents. It wasn't by design but it's a nice situation to be in.
If we strike out you can't just bash Donnie's plan.
What was the alternative? Try to recycle Marbury's expiring and add to Zach, Crawford, Curry, QBrick? To do what? Still lose terribly?
Come'on....no way.
This tear down HAD to happen no matter what 2010 brings. It had to be done. It should have been done instead of shipping Ewing out. It should have been done lining up with the end of 2007 (where everyone expired) instead of turning all those expirings into 2011 nightmare contracts.
IT HAS TO BE DONE. And it's being done.
Striking out in the coveted 2010 FA class doesn't make the plan a failure in my eyes because we had to do this regardless. We had to start over. HAD TO.
What we should do is view it as an added bonus it happened on the eve of the greatest FA class in some time! Not...as an end all to grading the plan.