BRIGGS wrote:Is shooting 55.5%--the best % for a 2 guard over the same period of time in the entire NBA--his FG % is now up to nealry 47% on the season. When he cut down on the 3 point shooting his accuracy when sky high

So why does his name always come up when we discuss a trade featuring a knick talent on the team.

playa2 wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Is shooting 55.5%--the best % for a 2 guard over the same period of time in the entire NBA--his FG % is now up to nealry 47% on the season. When he cut down on the 3 point shooting his accuracy when sky high

So why does his name always come up when we discuss a trade featuring a knick talent on the team.

Not sure. What's your theory?

Of course, our luck as it always is with the Knicks, when one player starts going on a tear - another player who WAS playing well turns into a complete SCRUB.

So we can never win with that with this roster.

Duhon plays well...Chandler is playing like a scrub.
Harrington plays well...Duhon starts playing like a scrub.
Chandler starts playing well...Harrington turns into a hack.

I mean, WTF? Is it just me seeing this?

Jeez. Can't they just play well at the same time? Or at least 2 of the 3?

We'd have so many more wins.

But, I guess that is what happens on a bad team with a mix of players who don't fit. When one thrives it's almost as if they cause another player to stink it up.

Chemistry problems.

Doesn't matter though. It will all be over in a few months and we can finally start actually BUILDING a team from the ashes left over from Isiah's fire.

playa2 wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Is shooting 55.5%--the best % for a 2 guard over the same period of time in the entire NBA--his FG % is now up to nealry 47% on the season. When he cut down on the 3 point shooting his accuracy when sky high

So why does his name always come up when we discuss a trade featuring a knick talent on the team.

Because people constantly see the glass as half empty. I remember several posts about low IQ or run-of-the-mill player, when he was not at 100%. He's a legit player with all star potential.

BRIGGS wrote:Is shooting 55.5%--the best % for a 2 guard over the same period of time in the entire NBA--his FG % is now up to nealry 47% on the season. When he cut down on the 3 point shooting his accuracy when sky high

His shot selection improved and his body fully healed. Once those two things happened, he came into his own. He is a good high energy guy that can do multiple things on the court. I still question whether he is a 2 guard, but he certainly can play there if he has to.

For all the IT haters, you have to give him props on taking Chandler over guys like Morris Almond and others people were clamoring for.

Nalod wrote:

playa2 wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:Is shooting 55.5%--the best % for a 2 guard over the same period of time in the entire NBA--his FG % is now up to nealry 47% on the season. When he cut down on the 3 point shooting his accuracy when sky high

So why does his name always come up when we discuss a trade featuring a knick talent on the team.

Because Wilson has value now as a trade asset. you have to give up talent to get talent. If removing JJ contract opens things up and you have to give up wilson then you do it.

So why not use Gallo as a trade asset???

"He's a legit player with all star potential."

The Mayor is stronger from where he started in November, but not totally healed. His movement seemed to gain confidence and more certainty after the cortisone shot.

The on-court relationship of Lee, Gallo and Chandler is a joy to watch develop.

Nope. This guy is looking like a keeper.