[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Goddamn Nate Robinson Costs the Knicks Another Game!!!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Topic LOCKED
Author Thread
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
1/1/2010  10:03 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/1/2010  10:05 PM
Seriously, get Nate Robinson back on the bench!

Because the absence of Nate Robinson equals wins! Everyone know this! The Knicks are better with out Nate Robinson.

The winning record in December had nothing to do with Duhon finally playing like he belongs in the NBA, or the Knicks getting some lucky breaks in the schedule...

Forget the fact that Nate Robinson probably won the Knicks 10 games himself last year!!! Or that he was producing very well in November 2009 while other players sucked!

***

Hold on...my sources tell me that Nate Robinson single-handedly won the game VS. the Hawks tonight!

Don't you see, Mike D'Antoni is a genius! He caused Nate Robinson to do that! The benching did it! All hail Mike D'Antoni!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
AUTOADVERT
Uptown
Posts: 31359
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883
1/1/2010  10:06 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/1/2010  10:09 PM
LOL...I knew a thread like this was coming

It wasn't Nates fault that we were losing while he was playing nor was his benching the main reason why we started winning. MDA had a somewhat winning combination going on while Nate was on the bench and he continued to go with it until he started to faulter, as it did the last couple of games. Just like tonight, Lee (despite playing at an allstar level the last week or so) was benched while Nate, Gallo, JJ, Wil, and Al helped bring the Knicks back. Coaches coach to win..
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/1/2010  10:06 PM
yeah! and channing frye is an all-star!
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
1/1/2010  10:07 PM
typical.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
1/1/2010  10:08 PM
crzymdups wrote:yeah! and channing frye is an all-star!

I love it when guys with nothing to say say a whole lot of nothing.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/1/2010  10:10 PM
difference between Nate & Marbury... MDA asks Marbury to play after his benching & Marbury pulls his usual selfish diva act & leaves his teammates high & dry... MDA needs to put Nate in cuz he's shorthanded... Nate comes out & gives a max effort & drops 41 & 8 & takes over the game... Nate did NOT deserve the Marbury treatment... good for Nate, he came out & reminded everyone who seemingly forgot what he could do & the type of contribution he could make for this team... he's not perfect, he still acts like a fool sometimes & it makes u wanna pull ur hair out, but when he's playing like he is tonight there is hardly a more exciting player to watch in the NBA.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
1/1/2010  10:10 PM
Uptown wrote:LOL...I knew a thread like this was coming

It wasn't Nates fault that we were losing while he was playing nor was his benching the main reason why we started winning. MDA had a somewhat winning combination going on while Nate was on the bench and he continued to go with it until he started to faulter, as it did the last couple of games. Just like tonight, Lee (despite playing at an allstar level the last week or so) was benched while Nate, Gallo, JJ, Wil, and Al hleped brign the Knicks back. Coaches coach to win..

Sorry, not playing Nate Robinson was not coaching to win, that was something personal. Maybe he said he fukced D'Antoni's sister or something. If Nate Robinson did that then I totally understand the benching and agree with it.

If it is about basketball Robinson did not deserve the benching.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
buddapaw
Posts: 23194
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101
1/1/2010  10:11 PM
TMS wrote:difference between Nate & Marbury... MDA asks Marbury to play after his benching & Marbury pulls his usual selfish diva act & leaves his teammates high & dry... MDA needs to put Nate in cuz he's shorthanded... Nate comes out & gives a max effort & drops 41 & 8 & takes over the game... Nate did NOT deserve the Marbury treatment... good for Nate, he came out & reminded everyone who seemingly forgot what he could do & the type of contribution he could make for this team... he's not perfect, he still acts like a fool sometimes & it makes u wanna pull ur hair out, but when he's playing like he is tonight there is hardly a more exciting player to watch in the NBA.

Well said

"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/1/2010  10:11 PM
oohah wrote:
Uptown wrote:LOL...I knew a thread like this was coming

It wasn't Nates fault that we were losing while he was playing nor was his benching the main reason why we started winning. MDA had a somewhat winning combination going on while Nate was on the bench and he continued to go with it until he started to faulter, as it did the last couple of games. Just like tonight, Lee (despite playing at an allstar level the last week or so) was benched while Nate, Gallo, JJ, Wil, and Al hleped brign the Knicks back. Coaches coach to win..

Sorry, not playing Nate Robinson was not coaching to win, that was something personal. Maybe he said he fukced D'Antoni's sister or something. If Nate Robinson did that then I totally understand the benching and agree with it.

If it is about basketball Robinson did not deserve the benching.

oohah

then explain why this was their first win all season when nate plays more than 19 minutes and why they were 9-6 while he was benched in december?

¿ △ ?
martin
Posts: 78484
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/1/2010  10:12 PM
oohah wrote:
Uptown wrote:LOL...I knew a thread like this was coming

It wasn't Nates fault that we were losing while he was playing nor was his benching the main reason why we started winning. MDA had a somewhat winning combination going on while Nate was on the bench and he continued to go with it until he started to faulter, as it did the last couple of games. Just like tonight, Lee (despite playing at an allstar level the last week or so) was benched while Nate, Gallo, JJ, Wil, and Al hleped brign the Knicks back. Coaches coach to win..

Sorry, not playing Nate Robinson was not coaching to win, that was something personal. Maybe he said he fukced D'Antoni's sister or something. If Nate Robinson did that then I totally understand the benching and agree with it.

If it is about basketball Robinson did not deserve the benching.

oohah

give me a break man. We don't need that kind of posts. Locking.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Topic LOCKED
Goddamn Nate Robinson Costs the Knicks Another Game!!!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy