Olbrannon wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:fishmike wrote:JohnWallace44 wrote:Not trading that contract is the worst thing Walsh has done since he's been here. That's about twice as bad as the Jeffries Nate non-deal.
you mean the one that was never offered by Sac? That one?
Yeah, or the other "imaginary" trades mentioned in the media (like the Zach one)...
We have two, probably fairly high, second round picks this year. It's the no first round pick that sucks...
You don't seem to understand...if you trade the contract you get only the value of the dollars and any other team would get the same. If it comes off the overage of the luxury cap it gets counted twice and is worth double face value since the Knicks would not be required to pay the penalty for those dollars. (For cap's sake it counts double anyway the insurance pays the largest portion of the player contract iirc)
I understand that. There is a big savings by not trading the contract. But, that said, you can trade the contract and get more than it's value perhaps, cause it's insured. There is a chance we could get a good player or draft pick, depending on the team.
In my post though, I was only talking about the trades that didn't happen that people complained about. The thing that we both were alluding to is that those "offers" were never made, at least that is what the truth appears to be many months later.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein