Nalod wrote:Fiction at beat as to what "head coach" jax would do. The guy is an announcer.
He racked up assists dumping the ball to ewing, smits and reggie. They padded his stats very nice.
Im not saying the guy is a hack, but lets build a monument to him either.
In hindsight Duhan sucks and we got problems. Nate is undependable except when we are down 20 points and he leads a failed comeback. In a crunch situaton Nate becomes very special and even more important his coach and perhaps his mates have no trust in him either as a leader or want him in a scrabble tournament. Nate is nate.
You're out of your mind with this "Dumping the ball" nonsense. Jackson was a) One of the most fundamental passers and B) One of the most creative passers the game has seen.
If it was so easy to dump the ball to Ewing, what happened to all the guards that played on the Knicks after Jackson? How come they had so much trouble getting Ewing the ball?
You have it backwards. Jackson padded the stats of Ewing, Miller, and Smits. (Especially Smits! I don't even know how you are citing that as an example of somebody who padded Jackson's assist total. Bizarre)
And I have not even gotten into the other guys who benefited from playing with Jackson such as Antonio Davis and Dale Davis.
Nalod, do your research. Players tend to have very strong, or career offensive years during the years they played with Mark Jackson. The evidence is there.
***
Onto your "He's an announcer" comment. What do you base that bias on? Jackson's pedigree, accomplishments, and qualifications should afford him the same chance to coach a team that D'Antoni had. You'll be posting a different tune when Jackson is coaching the Nets!
oohah