[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

finally uner 100
Author Thread
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/21/2009  3:29 PM
Finally we beat a team with out scoring a 100+ points and we kept them under a 100.

That happen less then 5 times last year..

ES
AUTOADVERT
TRU
Posts: 20752
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/25/2002
Member: #196
USA
11/21/2009  4:01 PM
It helped to have someone to post up, clearly.
Let it be known: I believe in the Knicks this year-- deep into the playoffs, I swear to you my brothers...
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/21/2009  4:43 PM
also helps to play the worst team in the NBA
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/21/2009  5:06 PM
You both have points but I'm a give the knicks a little more credit, they played some solid d in the 2 wins. Curry has impacted simply by getting to the line and putting guys in foul trouble. Were still struggling to find post up play consistantly, but we have at least starting to deflect passes and making a few extra hustle plays..
ES
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/21/2009  5:15 PM
i'll give the team credit for playing better defense, i noticed the same things u did w/the deflecting of passes & guys were fighting harder to front guys & deny passes inside... but our help defense on penetration is still piss poor & horrid... the force field around D Lee will not go away easily.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
11/21/2009  5:42 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/21/2009  5:42 PM
I thought I saw a headline to the effect that the players didn't want Iverson on the team. Maybe they were so grateful not to have Iverson that they played better, or maybe they made a deal with D'Antoni to give maximum effort if he wouldn't add Iverson to the roster.
https:// It's not so hard.
martin
Posts: 78490
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/21/2009  5:58 PM
BasketballJones wrote:I thought I saw a headline to the effect that the players didn't want Iverson on the team. Maybe they were so grateful not to have Iverson that they played better, or maybe they made a deal with D'Antoni to give maximum effort if he wouldn't add Iverson to the roster.

Walsh is obviously GM'ing effort out of his guys

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
finally uner 100

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy