[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Wilson Chandler's role
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

11/3/2009  5:56 PM
He's not a shooting guard....that experiment is done. He's not cut out for the position even though he can slide there for stints.

Chandler is a Forward.

Offensively...he has poor basketball IQ. He has no clue how to attack the defense. He drives when he should shoot and shoots when he should drive. Not a very effective scorer at all and needs more time to learn the game.

Right now is starting him at Power fwd. It makes more sense cuz it changes his focus. He made a few big man moves yesterday and proved hes strong enough to man up with the big men of the league. He battled New Orleans guys pretty good....just not overly effective....All I gotta say is thank God Al Harrington is on the team.

I'm thinking Wilson should be on the trading Block and Jordan Hill should stay ready cuz he has a potential spot to fill for the NY Knicks.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
Sangfroid
Posts: 24681
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/7/2009
Member: #2784

11/3/2009  8:41 PM
Until Jordan Hill memorizes every Amare tape, and then replicates that in practice and then on the court we'll be keeping Chandler.
"We are playing a game. We are playing at not playing a game..."
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
11/3/2009  10:01 PM
Wilson should be on the trading block for two and a half bad games?

He is a forward. He can play two guard if we had an average skilled point guard to set him up.

If the coach was telling him to drive instead of shoot jumpers he would do it.

Have a little patience with a guy who battled all year for us last season and has been our best all around player.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

11/3/2009  10:22 PM
JohnWallace44 wrote:Wilson should be on the trading block for two and a half bad games?

He is a forward. He can play two guard if we had an average skilled point guard to set him up.

If the coach was telling him to drive instead of shoot jumpers he would do it.

Have a little patience with a guy who battled all year for us last season and has been our best all around player.

Everything you said here is what has been said about him in the past...

Why does Wilson Chandler need an average skilled point guard to set him up? Nobody else on the team needs someone special to set them up. D'antoni wants open shots yes...pure jumpers? no he wants easy baskets. Wilson can score but has no idea how he should go about doing it.

It's only 4 games into the season but the fact still remains the Knicks and D'antoni are trying to figure out how to use Wilson. In my eyes its too much to deal with. When have you ever seen guys start at shooting guard and power fwd in the same season??? That is crazy imho.

Also "best all around player" to me sounds like he is an important piece to the teams success. That is not the case. If Wilson was traded for a piece that fits better no one would miss Wilson.

I happen to like the kid but he's becoming less important in the whole scheme of things....

I meantion Jordan Hill because if Wilson the opening day shooting guard is now the starting power fwd...the Knicks might need to find Jordan hill some playing time...like stop benching Al Harrington for one and put a natural power fwd in the game and let him gain experience.

I think fans are still hoping for Wilson to become Danny Granger.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
11/3/2009  10:22 PM
How about we slam D'Antoni? He basically came out today and said - well wilson's a 4. But, who's idea was it to make him a 2? And why did it take this long to realize that wasn't going to work out?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

11/3/2009  10:40 PM
franco12 wrote:How about we slam D'Antoni? He basically came out today and said - well wilson's a 4. But, who's idea was it to make him a 2? And why did it take this long to realize that wasn't going to work out?

Wilson was a 2 cuz Hughes got hurt last year and they didn't plan on using Hughes this year. Hughes is back so it seems and is way more effective at the position. Wilson has to go back to forward. Now its good to have a guy that can switch like this but I just think he isn't that good. He has a whole season to prove but as that trading deadline gets closer if they are still trying to baby Wilson and he still hasn't solidified a spot then somethings gotta be done.

Maybe they are hoping Wilson can replace Al Harrington so they don't have to pay Al in the summer....I'm just glad Al doesn't have confidence/ego issues and can drop 42 pts off the bench, smh.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
11/4/2009  12:42 AM
They are playing Gallo, Lee, Jeffries, Al, and Chandler at ambiguous positions. That's how it works when you have Steve Nash. What was different about the position that Q, Johnson, or Diaw played? Not much. We have Duhon. When Duhon was actually playing point he was not getting into the paint to kick out, and wasn't running plays with Chandler. Now with Hughes handling and Gallo initiating offense Duhon pretty much stands in the corner.

What I saw in the first couple of games was Wilson taking shots with a guy a couple of feet away that he needs to take when the defender is 6 feet away. Why is he taking those shots? Something tells me Wilson's not playing for a contract, he's playing for a system, a system with a broken point guard.

If you have a guy who can bring the ball up, defend four positions, and hit open shots and finish when he has the lane then you keep him on the floor. It's the job of the point guard to put him in position to use those skills. Trevor Ariza was once this player for us. Actually he wasn't this skilled at the time. If he played for the Hornets he'd be putting up 20 a game right now. He'll be able to do it on his own soon enough.

Either Wilson or the coaching staff or both has been correcting what we saw early on. He has been getting more efficient by the game and looked back to his usual self last game.

Take a deep breath on this kid. He does a lot of things for us, and did them all last year. He's not a player to panic about after a couple of games when the whole team was in chaos.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30223
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
11/4/2009  12:44 AM
Wilson is a SF but so is Gallo, Gallo can play PF but so does Lee. It would have been great if Chandler could have stuck at SG as that would have balanced future potential lineups out. Especially if a certain somebody decided to join our club.

If we keep Chandler and Lee in the off season then Gallo, Lee, Chandler can be the 3 man trio at Forward. Chandler could come off the bench yet still get 30mins. Gallo could slide between SF and PF. That would work out pretty good if you think about it.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
11/4/2009  5:42 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:Wilson is a SF but so is Gallo, Gallo can play PF but so does Lee. It would have been great if Chandler could have stuck at SG as that would have balanced future potential lineups out. Especially if a certain somebody decided to join our club.

If we keep Chandler and Lee in the off season then Gallo, Lee, Chandler can be the 3 man trio at Forward. Chandler could come off the bench yet still get 30mins. Gallo could slide between SF and PF. That would work out pretty good if you think about it.

Exactly. He tried to make Chandler a 2 because we have 3 SFs on the team. Chandler is a SF period. He is not big enough to play PF consistently and he does not have the skills of a 2 guard. I like CHandler because he brings it on defense every game, he blocks shots, and he stays active around thebasket. For those complaining about his shot, it is not like the guy is Jeffries. He can hit an open shot, he just shoots a little too much from the outside rather than using his quickness to get into the paint. That is a habit that can be coached out of him. I would put Chandler on the trading block, but not because I don't like his game. It would be because we have Gallo as our future SF and Lee/Hill as our future PF. There really is no spot for Chandler. If we could turn Chandler and $3 million into Rubio, I would do that in a hot minute.

Trust the Process
Wilson Chandler's role

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy