[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If we are not good by the 30th game
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/1/2009  9:21 AM
Than I would start trying to dump everyone on a one year contract for picks young cheap assets or even additional cap space. I think we need to play Jefferies and it seems like he will earn that time anyway. If we are 13-17 or better and showing promise--then I may hold but anything less---dumpathon. If we get out 1-8 or something like that--I may initiate those talks sooner. We have no way to sign back everyone--so if we are not successful or atleast showing serious signs of being successful--I would be trying to pull the trigger early before other teams do.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/1/2009  9:41 AM
but whats the point of filling our team with scrubs if we dont even have our pick?
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/1/2009  9:47 AM
Walsh will probably be able to make some trades for draft picks. I doubt we pick up any young talent because that will likely mean also picking up non-expiring deals that will impact the 2010 cap. I, however, hope that if a top-tier player becomes available (like Gasol did two years ago), that Walsh will not be so blind as to ignore the opportunity.
Trust the Process
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/1/2009  9:56 AM
What's the most we'd be able to get in return?

Trading Al Harrington (expiring) for a lesser player on an expiring deal to aid a contender is going to get you what?

a 2nd round pick?

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
10/1/2009  10:07 AM
Wow, I agree. But dump who for a one year deal? Jeffries? Curry? Sweet dreams. Maybe if we trade one of them with Lee. but like I said, no rush to trade Curry. You can trade him this summer when he's an expiring deal. Ya feel me?
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
NYKBocker
Posts: 38456
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
10/1/2009  10:20 AM
I think BRIGGS is right. The Godfather has enough assets to get a 1st round pick. Nate, DLee, Harrington can be valuable 1 year mercenaries for a contender needing an extra player for the playoff push.

One example would be a Nate, Mobley for Big Z and CLE 1st RD Pick which would likely be a late first rounder. Cavs need a dynamic player and BigZ and Shaq is not going to work.

If TMac is still on the fritz then Houston may look into getting DLee, Hughes and Nate for TMac and 2 1st rounders(1 future).

There are just so many possibilities. The Godfather has put us in a great position.


[Edited by - NYKBocker on 10-01-2009 10:21 AM]
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
10/1/2009  10:45 AM
It's a good idea if the possible results are worth it. If we have to dump someone in our rotation to get the 28th pick in the draft, I'd pass, but if we get a decent young player or a mid-round pick, I'd do it.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/1/2009  10:47 AM
Pretty sure Nate and Lee are basically untradable unless we're sending them somewhere they want to go.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
10/1/2009  10:48 AM
what happened to all the optimism and focusing on today, from a week ago?

I do agree. I don't think you keep a bunch of guys with expiring contracts that aren't performing. That can turn ugly in a hurry. That being said, I wouldnt' rush in to anything either. I would give it 30 or so games and then at that point you start exploring if there is no improvement. On the flipside if there are signs beign shown I think it's wise to keep the team together so that the young guys can experience stability for the first time in their careers.
I just hope that people will like me
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
10/1/2009  10:49 AM
They don't have to agree on a trade. They re-signed for one year. That was only if they took the QO. They did not and chose to sign a new contract.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/1/2009  11:30 AM
better check that. I'm pretty sure the same rule applies when you're under any one year deal
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
10/1/2009  11:45 AM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

better check that. I'm pretty sure the same rule applies when you're under any one year deal

I think that's right.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
10/1/2009  11:47 AM
Love that Darko quote GKF

That would make players on the Rucker courts blush
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
10/1/2009  12:24 PM
Lee and Nate can veto any trade this year.
dodger78
Posts: 20909
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/7/2002
Member: #250
Germany
10/1/2009  12:25 PM
Hey John, dont tell me you dont know my most favorit video of Darko! ;-)
The guy def. got some temperament!!!

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

10/1/2009  1:28 PM
I hear what you're saying about the 30-game mark as a barometer but their evaluation process & patience will most likely extend a little longer than that as will other teams with respect to their own situations as well. If anything I think contending teams or bubble teams will wait right up until the deadline before they consider trading for additional components that may get them over the hump. That's usually how it goes - evaluate your own up until the last minute to make sure the answers can't come from within. As for a Pau Gasol-type move during the season, as good a player like that is, I don't see us doing something like that - they feel optimum cap room is the most important thing for them right now.

The guys I think you're talking about on our team are already on 1-yr. deals so getting addition cap space doesn't really seem possible (any trade for any of our one-and-done guys is just gonna be contract for contract, unless you're talking about moving Curry or Jeffries which I hope happens but doesn't seem likely) and I doubt we could get any picks -- decent 1st round picks -- for anyone but maybe I'm wrong (if anything maybe we could snag a 1st rounder for Lee or Nate in a package when the time comes but with their veto power, I don't see them going anywhere unless it's completely desirable for them like going to a title contender or going to play the rest of the year with D-Wade in South Beach, something like that... Neither of these two are accepting any trade to go to a less desirable place like Minny or Memphis for half a season just to help Donnie & the Knicks. Ain't happenin'.). Now if Harrington plays well could we get a 1st rounder for him at the all-star break in a package? Maybe. But I think Donnie loves Al and I think when the time comes if there's room for another piece after a big FA signing & it's between Al and Lee, I have a funny feeling Donnie looks to bring Al back. As of right now though -- I'm pumped fellas. I actually think the Knicks assembled a pretty well-balanced team, all considered, and there will be much more stability and some nice depth for Mike to work with right from the start this year. I think they will be given every opportunity to gel. Obviously we're not where we need to be but I really don't think the 40-win plateau and the playoffs are completely out of the question for this club. No question going 1-8, 1-9 outta the gate would be rough but I just think they'll remain patient longer than what you might think...

[Edited by - finestrg on 10-01-2009 1:34 PM]
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/1/2009  1:39 PM
so we're going to attract top level free agents by having a team of full of mid-to-late first round picks?

Ya'll crazy, this isnt 2005 anymore, enough of the tear it down talk.

My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/1/2009  1:41 PM
I think the guy you monitor closely is Chandler. His stats the first two years are almost identical to Danny Granger. If he shows anything like that kind of potential obviously you keep him around. He could just as easily be the next Desmond Mason. Athletic 2/3 guy that can give you some good #s but not skilled enough or a high enough BB IQ to make it to that next level.

If thats the case I would a package of Chandler along with Curry or JJ for an expiring and a lottery pick or couple first rounders would appeal to a lot of teams.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TheGame
Posts: 26647
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/1/2009  1:55 PM
Posted by fishmike:

I think the guy you monitor closely is Chandler. His stats the first two years are almost identical to Danny Granger. If he shows anything like that kind of potential obviously you keep him around. He could just as easily be the next Desmond Mason. Athletic 2/3 guy that can give you some good #s but not skilled enough or a high enough BB IQ to make it to that next level.

If thats the case I would a package of Chandler along with Curry or JJ for an expiring and a lottery pick or couple first rounders would appeal to a lot of teams.

I would say Chandler is better than Desmond Mason right now but I agree with your point. Walsh and MDA have to evaluate everyone on this team and determine who they want to stay and who they want to get rid of. And, after they do that, they also have to evaluate who they think they can get this summer. The next 12 months will probably determine the direction of this team for the next 3-4 years. Walsh better make some good decisions.
Trust the Process
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/1/2009  2:04 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by fishmike:

I think the guy you monitor closely is Chandler. His stats the first two years are almost identical to Danny Granger. If he shows anything like that kind of potential obviously you keep him around. He could just as easily be the next Desmond Mason. Athletic 2/3 guy that can give you some good #s but not skilled enough or a high enough BB IQ to make it to that next level.

If thats the case I would a package of Chandler along with Curry or JJ for an expiring and a lottery pick or couple first rounders would appeal to a lot of teams.

I would say Chandler is better than Desmond Mason right now but I agree with your point. Walsh and MDA have to evaluate everyone on this team and determine who they want to stay and who they want to get rid of. And, after they do that, they also have to evaluate who they think they can get this summer. The next 12 months will probably determine the direction of this team for the next 3-4 years. Walsh better make some good decisions.
he might be and I hope so, but I remember Mason coming out of Sea and he was on the bubble of becoming a bigtime player. He certainly had some very good years then kinda fizzled out.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
If we are not good by the 30th game

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy