[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If we somehow get Sessions in a S+T
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2009  9:57 PM
and lose Lee--I think a good replacement for the year would be Warrick[if we cant get Boozer] His production per minute has very very good and i think he could be had for a 1 year 4-4.5mm $ contract> He's the kind of athlete who could really do well in this typem of fast tempo--I would expect to see his FG rise from 50-54/55. I think he is capable of 17-7 in 32 minutes here.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
LivingLegend
Posts: 26320
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

7/19/2009  9:59 PM
I've always been a Warrick fan - I agree with you.

I think he'd be a fan favorite as well.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/19/2009  10:07 PM
What's Warricks situation though? Is he restricted??? I would think Memphis would turn their head to him since they have Zach and some nice youngins on the bench starting with the kid from Kansas.....

Warrick is very good and from following fantasy basketball....he was jumping off the waiver wire I believe last season when he was knocking back double doubles and scoring around 18.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
kingofelpaso
Posts: 20270
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/3/2009
Member: #2542

7/19/2009  10:16 PM
Hah,

I was just reading about warrick still being available. He's a flawed player, but for a short period of time, why not?

I've always been a big fan of his going back to watching him play when I was at 'cuse
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/19/2009  10:40 PM
He's just an OK player. I always thought he'd block more shots.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/19/2009  10:42 PM
We get Sessions and Duhon is his backup? With Douglas DNP-CD?

I'd hope we burnt Duhon on getting Sessions and have Douglas as his backup --- and use Lee for something else.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2009  10:48 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

We get Sessions and Duhon is his backup? With Douglas DNP-CD?

I'd hope we burnt Duhon on getting Sessions and have Douglas as his backup --- and use Lee for something else.

Is Douglas ready to be a back up right now? I think given time he can eb a player but a pure backup--I dont know about that. If a starter went down could he ru[i]n the show?
RIP Crushalot😞
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/19/2009  10:52 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

We get Sessions and Duhon is his backup? With Douglas DNP-CD?

I'd hope we burnt Duhon on getting Sessions and have Douglas as his backup --- and use Lee for something else.

I think Duhon is a trading chip at the deadline or possibly even now. Id Douglas shows a lot in practice Duhon will certianly be moved.
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/20/2009  1:00 AM
I wonder if we have a realistic shot at getting Boozer and Sessions. If that's the case you can let Lee/Nate walk and potentially have enough money at a max guy and not have to renounce Boozer's rights (might need to also move Jefferies depending on how much you pay Sessions). With Boozer and Sessions I think we could realistically be a much better team than last year and have the flexibiity to add some players in 2010.
madlib
Posts: 20167
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/7/2005
Member: #950
7/20/2009  1:39 AM
Posted by VDesai:

I wonder if we have a realistic shot at getting Boozer and Sessions. If that's the case you can let Lee/Nate walk and potentially have enough money at a max guy and not have to renounce Boozer's rights (might need to also move Jefferies depending on how much you pay Sessions). With Boozer and Sessions I think we could realistically be a much better team than last year and have the flexibiity to add some players in 2010.

I think Sessions is a real possibility. The bucks don't need him and I don't think any other teams are showing any real interest in him. Boozer though is a long shot. We don't have anything Utah want which means there has to be another team involved and that can get complicated.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/20/2009  8:55 AM
If we do get Sessions, then it certainly begs the question (& hindsight is 20/20, but good execs look ahead), why on earth we didn't move Nate & Jefferies when we supposedly had the chance at the deadline.

In fact, its even less forgivable if you realize this was known as a guard heavy draft. and the cap # has been rumored to be heading south.
VDesai
Posts: 43296
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/20/2009  9:10 AM
With Boozer they want to avoid the luxury tax. With the cost savings they would get on Mobley's contract, I think we may come closest to fitting that objective. If we had a 2010 first rounder to give that might....oh wait they already have ours.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/20/2009  9:38 AM


Warrick would be a helluva player to bring in off the bench. I've only seen him in a couple of games in the NBA, but when he left the 'Cuse he had some sweet jumper moves from the elbow and could always run, jump, block, or otherwise do anything athletic that you would want someone to do.

Here's Hollinger's breakdown from ESPN

2007-08 season: Warrick probably has a Pau Gasol voodoo doll in his locker, as once again he played both far better and far more often when Gasol was out of the lineup. After the Gasol trade, Warrick averaged 16.0 points per game on 49.1 percent shooting; for the season he ranked in the top third of power forwards in usage rate and TS% and 22nd in PER.

Warrick's development of a jumper is a positive story, but last year he got a little too confident in it. Nearly a third of his shots were long 2s, and he made only 37.7 percent. He needs to remember that he's still at his best around the basket, where he made an eye-popping 66.9 percent of his attempts.

One pleasant surprise was how Warrick slashed his turnover ratio from a year earlier, moving into the top third among power forwards after posting consistently poor rates throughout college and the pros. The increase in jumpers might have had something to do with this because it allowed him to keep the ball out of harm's way more often, but he needs to find a happy medium between attacking and pulling up, and he isn't quite there yet.

Scouting report: A slender, quick big man, Warrick struggles to keep up at the defensive end and that's the reason he hasn't played more despite solid offensive production. Warrick is a below-average rebounder and has trouble keeping opponents out of prime post position, and though he's quick for his size that hasn't translated into especially vibrant defense on the perimeter.

Warrick also has some of the worst on-court versus off-court numbers in basketball during the past two seasons, though the fact that most of his minutes have come with Gasol hurt or gone via trade undoubtedly contributed.

Offensively, Warrick likes to face up and use the threat of his quickness to launch a turnaround J; he's become reasonably accurate on these but tends to fade to his left, and when he misses it's usually to that side. He's better when he blows by bigger opponents to either draw fouls or rise up and finish for dunks in the paint.

2008-09 outlook: Fortunately for Warrick, Memphis' newest Gasol isn't as likely to impinge on his playing time because Marc is a pure 5. That should leave Warrick as the unquestioned starter at power forward, and he should be able to put up very solid offensive numbers with a full season at the spot.

Of course, that's only half the game. In order to stay a starter for long, Warrick will have to show he's capable of playing far better defense than he showed a year ago. He's always going to give up pounds, but if he can harness his quickness and leaping ability to become more of a factor, he might be able to establish himself as a long-term solution.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/20/2009  7:22 PM
Posted by madlib:
Posted by VDesai:

I wonder if we have a realistic shot at getting Boozer and Sessions. If that's the case you can let Lee/Nate walk and potentially have enough money at a max guy and not have to renounce Boozer's rights (might need to also move Jefferies depending on how much you pay Sessions). With Boozer and Sessions I think we could realistically be a much better team than last year and have the flexibiity to add some players in 2010.

I think Sessions is a real possibility. The bucks don't need him and I don't think any other teams are showing any real interest in him. Boozer though is a long shot. We don't have anything Utah want which means there has to be another team involved and that can get complicated.

i don't think sessions is a real possibility... really?
¿ △ ?
madlib
Posts: 20167
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/7/2005
Member: #950
7/20/2009  7:29 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by madlib:
Posted by VDesai:

I wonder if we have a realistic shot at getting Boozer and Sessions. If that's the case you can let Lee/Nate walk and potentially have enough money at a max guy and not have to renounce Boozer's rights (might need to also move Jefferies depending on how much you pay Sessions). With Boozer and Sessions I think we could realistically be a much better team than last year and have the flexibiity to add some players in 2010.

I think Sessions is a real possibility. The bucks don't need him and I don't think any other teams are showing any real interest in him. Boozer though is a long shot. We don't have anything Utah want which means there has to be another team involved and that can get complicated.

i don't think sessions is a real possibility... really?

I think he is. By all reports (and I know most are BS) Donnie is looking for a starting PG. He tried to sign Kidd, has had meetings with Miller and there are a lot of rumours going around about us and Sessions. I know he is just exploring all options, but I really think by the time training camp comes around we will have a new starting point guard and I think the most likely option is Sessions.
If we somehow get Sessions in a S+T

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy