[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

NY Post: Boozer Has Knicks Buzzing
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/14/2009  8:34 AM
http://www.nypost.com/seven/07142009/sports/knicks/lee__nate_deals_must_happen_soon_179098.htm

Martin/Des get your wish on the ban of realgm articles
CARLOS BOOZER HAS KNICKS BUZZING

By MARC BERMAN

July 14, 2009 --

LAS VEGAS -- Donnie Walsh says he has intensified negotiations with David Lee and Nate Robinson, and indicated if something isn't done this week, it may not happen at all.

The Knicks president also acknowledged interest in trading for on-the-block Jazz All-Star forward Carlos Boozer, who could more than replace Lee. But it seems a long shot because several teams, including the Bulls, are involved. A three-team deal has been discussed for the Bulls' Kirk Hinrich. Boozer averaged 20.2 points and 13.4 rebounds last season.

KNICKS BLOG

BERMAN ON TWITTER

"I'm not sure we have anybody they want," Walsh said of the Jazz.

According to a source, Walsh loves Boozer's inside game and his contract, which has just one year left on it. Walsh believes Boozer will be traded and has spoken to the Jazz.

"Everyone knows the Knicks are after one-year contracts," the source said.

The Jazz are contemplating matching a $32 million offer sheet to their own free agent, Paul Millsap, only if they can deal Boozer, a rugged power forward. Boozer has one year and $12.6M left on his pact, and the Knicks would own his Bird rights if they wanted to re-sign the All-Star power forward in 2010. The Knicks' best pawn is the expiring pact of retired Cuttino Mobley, which is covered mostly by insurance.

Since the Knicks were rejected by Grant Hill, Walsh is zeroing in on Lee, though a major road block still seems to exist with agent Mark Bartelstein's asking price of at least $10 million a year.

Robinson, also without an offer sheet, is more likely to sign a one-year qualifying offer and become an unrestricted free agent next season.

"I've talked to both agents and it's going to be ongoing this week," Walsh said. "(We've) gotten the other way, trying to deal with them ourselves. If that doesn't work, maybe we go another direction after that. If it's not getting done now, it's not getting done."

The Knicks' thinking on Boozer is he would increase the likelihood of another star free agent coming aboard in 2010, though Walsh likely would have to gain more cap space.

Bartelstein said he has spoken to the Jazz about Lee, but would not say if it included a sign-and-trade scenario with Boozer. Bartelstein has spoken to multiple teams about sign-and-trades, but the Knicks would only do it if the player coming back has a one-year contract or is an All-Star.

Walsh won't say he's confident he can sign Lee.

"It's up to them," Walsh said.

Portland was the last team under the cap interested in Lee and it's thrown its money at Millsap.

"Trades can change everything," Walsh said. "It can clear room and now somebody not figuring on putting an offer sheet can if they get the room."

But Walsh admitted his chances have increased since July 1.

"I sense the market is not dying to be throwing big numbers out," Walsh said.

Hopefully Utah ends up being interested in the Lee deal...
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
7/14/2009  8:56 AM
Getting Boozer for Lee plus someone else (Mobley's contract or Jeffries) would shake up the team in a positive direction. It probably would need to be a 3-way as the Jazz will re-sign Millsap and won't need Lee. Go for it Donnie.



[Edited by - markji on 07-14-2009 07:58 AM]
The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/14/2009  9:10 AM
Wait....how does Boozer for a year help? Sure, it doesn't hurt 2010, but it doesn't help much either. Would rather use Mobley in an effort to get Rubio.
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/14/2009  9:12 AM
and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/14/2009  9:14 AM
Posted by purple012870:

and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?

We either keep Boozer or deal him at the deadline to a contender for some young players and an expiring.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2009  9:15 AM
Or if we gave Boozer a reasonable contract extension, say for 3 years, he could be nice sign and trade bait in 2010. I wouldn't say I love Boozer but he's a good player and having him on a 1 year contract would give us some great options.
joec32033
Posts: 30623
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/14/2009  9:17 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by purple012870:

and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?

We either keep Boozer or deal him at the deadline to a contender for some young players and an expiring.

Or we end up with Hill playing center next to Boozer....
~You can't run from who you are.~
Nalod
Posts: 71788
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/14/2009  9:25 AM
Guy played 37 games last season so Im concerned with his injury.

This is how Walsh has to get a good player. A little luck.

Booze has to know he if comes he might not get a big deal from us.

Its a new financial world.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2009  9:27 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by purple012870:

and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?

We either keep Boozer or deal him at the deadline to a contender for some young players and an expiring.

Or we end up with Hill playing center next to Boozer....

Boozer's injury history is worrisome. I'm not sure I'd want him in the picture long-term. He's a very good player when healthy though.
joec32033
Posts: 30623
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/14/2009  9:47 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by purple012870:

and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?

We either keep Boozer or deal him at the deadline to a contender for some young players and an expiring.

Or we end up with Hill playing center next to Boozer....

Boozer's injury history is worrisome. I'm not sure I'd want him in the picture long-term. He's a very good player when healthy though.

Yeah but that it is ok because he only got a year. The key would be unloading Jefferies or even Curry in the deal and giving us that room. At this point Lee is really extraneous with the moves we made thus far.
~You can't run from who you are.~
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
7/14/2009  10:06 AM
Would Utah be hesistant to trade Boozer to the Knicks because they have the Knicks unprotected pick next year? Also, could Walsh add Miller and Boozer and still keep the Knicks relevant for the 2010 free agent class?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/14/2009  10:27 AM
I'm really concern with his health. Don't expect JJ or curry to be part of any deal involving an all star..I don't see anyone being that stupid.
ES
NYKBocker
Posts: 38459
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
7/14/2009  10:36 AM
I am a little hesitant with Boozer as well. His health is a big sticking point. He would be ideal in the Pringles system though as he is a very good shooter.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
7/14/2009  11:12 AM
If he's healthy he improves us dramatically. IF he's not I hope we don't give up much for him. The interesting thing is why would Utah look to help improve our team thus lowering the value of our 2010 pick which they have rights to?

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/14/2009  11:42 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by purple012870:

and if you're thinking he'd sign long term, he plays the same posish as Jordan Hill


so isn't that trade (Lee & Mobley) a deal of 2 assets for a 1 year PF?

We either keep Boozer or deal him at the deadline to a contender for some young players and an expiring.

Or we end up with Hill playing center next to Boozer....

Boozer's injury history is worrisome. I'm not sure I'd want him in the picture long-term. He's a very good player when healthy though.

Yeah but that it is ok because he only got a year. The key would be unloading Jefferies or even Curry in the deal and giving us that room. At this point Lee is really extraneous with the moves we made thus far.

Yeah but then what do we do with Boozer?
A) trade him probably for a lesser player. His injury history will prevent us from getting back an equal talent.
B) Re-sign him to a big long-term contract. This is a risk because of his injury history.

I'm not saying this would be a better situation but rather that it brings up a lot of difficult issues with unclear solutions. If he stays healthy and plays like he can, I could see the Knicks' fans and management falling in love with him and making a big, long-term, risky commitment to him.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 07-14-2009 11:42 AM]
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/14/2009  11:44 AM
That's a good point, but if you can save major $ I think that's more of an incentive, at the same time pick up a solid young player. That to me over rides any draft picks.
ES
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/14/2009  11:47 AM
I don't really like Boozer. He's a prototype power fwd though, very polished. David Lee used to bust his ass though. Boozer will bang and man up in the middle, I will give him that. If Lee was more like that we wouldn't even be talking about anybody else.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Nalod
Posts: 71788
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
7/14/2009  12:02 PM
Another Dookie!!!!
Moonangie
Posts: 24767
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 7/9/2009
Member: #2788

7/14/2009  12:42 PM
Lee often plays at the 5 spot, out of his natural position. Not saying he will become a defensive stopper, but he isn't big enough to bang the goliaths. THat wil never be his game. If he would just have more active hands he might be able to force a bunch of turnovers against the dorks who keep the ball too low.

[Edited by - Moonangie on 07-14-2009 12:42 PM]
ramtour420
Posts: 26601
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
7/14/2009  2:15 PM
Um, if Boozer is on the team will that lower our chances of signing Lebron? If Boozer didn't leave cleveland for the $ they would have likely won a title already. Not sure if there is any bad blood there, but there might be. . .
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
NY Post: Boozer Has Knicks Buzzing

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy