[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Wilson Chandler or the 8th pick to move up to #5?
Author Thread
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  5:53 PM
Nbadraft.net reporting a rumor that the Knicks are interested in moving up using either package. What do ya do here? Chandler's a big piece moving forward but to get the #5 from Washington, that's what it might take. Would rather trade a package built around the #8 and other pieces but I'd have to really consider moving Wilson in order to get #5 AND keep #8 but I'd have to then replace Wilson with a guy like Young, Summers, or Brown to make this work - we're on the verge of losing too many wings to do this and then not replace Chandler.

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 7:53 PM]
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/20/2009  6:06 PM
I'd rather not lose out on Wilson but I do think that if we were to trade him for the 5th pick, we would make out ok.

Totally agree with you about taking a guy like Sam Young plus he can be had by just purchasing a pick around 18.. I think he would be a fantastic replacement for Chandler if we indeed do go that route. I would venture to say that he would come in and immediately give us the same things that Chandler gave us last year.

If you were to couple Young with 2 of the following: Curry, DeRozan, Evans, Jennings, Mullens.

Couple that group of 3 in addition to what we already have, I think you have a pretty solid team.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
buddapaw
Posts: 23191
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101

6/20/2009  6:36 PM
If we get the 5 and keep our 8, I'm drafting a big backcourt Evans and DeRozan or Evans and Hill
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
6/20/2009  6:42 PM
every year we talk about buying 1st round picks but it never appears to be all that easy to do.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/20/2009  7:02 PM
Might as well watch Chandler go for his championship as well. I getting use to it. He is doom to fail with this team if he stays. Killa is right. He is the only guy with value still under contract. It is a damn shame that last pick has absolutely no value to any team. That has to be a first.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
6/20/2009  7:32 PM
Screw that. Why trade a guy who is on the verge of becoming a quality starter for our team for an unknown?
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
6/20/2009  7:48 PM
^^ Yea, I see Wilson as a cornerstone to our championship teams of the early to mid 2010s. Trading him to move up three spots in what is considered the weakest draft in recent history? Why?

I don't like it no matter who we can land; I don't think there is much difference between what we can get at 8 and at 5.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
TLover
Posts: 21067
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
6/20/2009  8:14 PM
You can't trade Wilson Chandler just to move up from 8. If you do trade him you need to get #5 & Washington takes back Jefferies for Etan Thomas.

Wouldn't mind looking into getting Andrey Blatche who is a power forward that would fit into the Knicks system. Then you can consider the swap of picks.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/20/2009  8:15 PM
I wouldn't trade Wilson and I wouldn't move up unless a guy like Evans or Thabeet happened to be on the board on draft night at the 5 spot. The reality is that someone will drop to 8. The problem in the past with the Knicks has been that they lock in on a player or position and ignore the guys with the most potential available. Chandler is better than what you could get at 5.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27542
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/20/2009  10:21 PM
I wouldn't package Wil with the 8 for the 5 pick. I would trade him straight up for the 5 pick though. If you can turn Wil Chandler into Hill, you do it. After that, you have pick the either Curry, Holiday or Derozan with the 8th pick.


You know I gonna spin wit it
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  10:21 PM
Question: If we surrendered Chandler in a package to get back #5 what would you want back in addition to the 5th pick? You figure we're not getting any of their top guys like Arenas or Butler (I don't necessarily want those guys anyway) and we probably couldn't get McGee or Nick Young either w/o raising the stakes considerably. How 'bout Dominic McGuire coming back along with #5? Bottom line is the 5th pick is a lot of value in itself, I understand that, but parting ways with Chandler coupled with the probability of losing so many of our wings like Harrington, Hughes, Richardson, probably Nate etc..., I'd need a replacement for Wilson in the rotation otherwise I just can't justify doing this, not if we wind up using #5 on the point guard we want. McGuire might be the key to this deal. He's a little on the unheralded side, but he's got nice size, he's still young, he's a plus athlete and plays solid defense. Hasn't really shown much of a perimeter game yet but I think he has the tools to develop that aspect eventually. With an expanded role and a little bit of a longer leash, I think McGuire could really surprise. How much of a difference is there between McGuire and the low-end SFs in this draft like Young, Summers, Brown, Cunningham, Green, etc.? A little but not much. He's not that far behind some of these guys & possibly even ahead of a few talent-wise. He's right there in the mix with this group, I think. I could make a Chandler + for #5 trade work with the Wizards and I'd have no problem even sweetening the pot a bit to make it happen but I'd have to get McGuire back to make this work...

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 10:45 PM]
Ira
Posts: 24688
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/20/2009  10:24 PM
Chandler for the fifth? It depends on who's there. If Curry's there, I do it. If he's gone, probably not.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  10:36 PM
Posted by Ira:

Chandler for the fifth? It depends on who's there. If Curry's there, I do it. If he's gone, probably not.

I agree totally. Obviously I'm interested in Rubio and some of the other top guys but I've been saying all along, Curry's worth moving up a few spots to secure in my eyes and he's just a more realistic guy for us in a move-up type deal. He'd be perfect for us. If these rumors with Washington are true, I think that's exactly what the Knicks might be thinking as well.

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 10:50 PM]
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27542
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
6/20/2009  10:49 PM
Posted by Finestrg:

Question: If we surrendered Chandler in a package to get back #5 what would you want back in addition to the 5th pick? You figure we're not getting any of their top guys like Arenas or Butler (I don't necessarily want those guys anyway) and we probably couldn't get McGee or Nick Young either w/o raising the stakes considerably. How 'bout Dominic McGuire coming back along with #5? Bottom line is the 5th pick is a lot of value in itself, I understand that, but parting ways with Chandler coupled with the probability of losing so many of our wings like Harrington, Hughes, Richardson, probably Nate etc..., I'd need a replacement for Wilson in the rotation otherwise I just can't justify doing this, not if we wind up using #5 on the point guard we want. McGuire might be the key to this deal. He's a little on the unheralded side, but he's got nice size, he's still young, he's a plus athlete and plays solid defense. Hasn't really shown much of a perimeter game yet but I think he has the tools to develop that aspect eventually. With an expanded role and a little bit of a longer leash, I think McGuire could really surprise. How much of a difference is there between McGuire and the low-end SFs in this draft like Young, Summers, Brown, Cunningham, Green, etc.? A little but not much. He's not that far behind some of these guys & possibly even ahead of a few talent-wise. He's right there in the mix with this group, I think. I could make a Chandler + for #5 trade work with the Wizards and I'd have no problem even sweetening the pot a bit to make it happen but I'd have to get McGuire back to make this work...

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 10:45 PM]

I don't beleive Chandler brings back more than the 5 pick. If Chandler was coming out this year, how highly would you value him? Would you draft him over Stephen Curry? Would you draft him over Jordan Hill? I don't think I would pick Chandler over either of these guys.
You know I gonna spin wit it
unstopaball12
Posts: 21174
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/7/2006
Member: #1137
Philippines
6/20/2009  11:00 PM
id do it if harden was available or rubio those are the only 2 players i want at 5
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
6/20/2009  11:03 PM
If you can keep the 8th pick, I think it would be a trade you'd have to do, but I'd rather do it for the 3rd or 4th pick. I'm getting the feeling that all of the 2-5 teams are willing to trade the pick.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  11:05 PM
Posted by EwingsGlass:
Posted by Finestrg:

Question: If we surrendered Chandler in a package to get back #5 what would you want back in addition to the 5th pick? You figure we're not getting any of their top guys like Arenas or Butler (I don't necessarily want those guys anyway) and we probably couldn't get McGee or Nick Young either w/o raising the stakes considerably. How 'bout Dominic McGuire coming back along with #5? Bottom line is the 5th pick is a lot of value in itself, I understand that, but parting ways with Chandler coupled with the probability of losing so many of our wings like Harrington, Hughes, Richardson, probably Nate etc..., I'd need a replacement for Wilson in the rotation otherwise I just can't justify doing this, not if we wind up using #5 on the point guard we want. McGuire might be the key to this deal. He's a little on the unheralded side, but he's got nice size, he's still young, he's a plus athlete and plays solid defense. Hasn't really shown much of a perimeter game yet but I think he has the tools to develop that aspect eventually. With an expanded role and a little bit of a longer leash, I think McGuire could really surprise. How much of a difference is there between McGuire and the low-end SFs in this draft like Young, Summers, Brown, Cunningham, Green, etc.? A little but not much. He's not that far behind some of these guys & possibly even ahead of a few talent-wise. He's right there in the mix with this group, I think. I could make a Chandler + for #5 trade work with the Wizards and I'd have no problem even sweetening the pot a bit to make it happen but I'd have to get McGuire back to make this work...

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 10:45 PM]

I don't beleive Chandler brings back more than the 5 pick. If Chandler was coming out this year, how highly would you value him? Would you draft him over Stephen Curry? Would you draft him over Jordan Hill? I don't think I would pick Chandler over either of these guys.

I agree with you - Wilson would definitely be a 1st rounder but yeah, he probably wouldn't be in the top 10, maybe more 10-20, but at the very least around the same spot he was drafted a couple of years ago. But Chandler then and now is a little bit of a different animal. He's developing into a fine player. But yeah, the trade would have to be fleshed out a little - we'd have to sweeten it up a little but unlike prior years, we now have a few assets to make something like this work (Duhon, Harrington, the Mobley insured expiring, Nate and/or Lee in a hand shake July deal, the 2010 Denver 2nd rounder). Again, I'd need McGuire back or else it doesn't make too much sense for us. Or maybe, at the very least, we get the Wizard's #32 and then use that pick on the best SF available (hopefully a guy like Young, Summers or Brown slips).

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 11:12 PM]
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
6/20/2009  11:08 PM
If we somehow kept the 8th pick and ended up with Curry and DeRozan, I'd be extremely happy.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  11:13 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

If we somehow kept the 8th pick and ended up with Curry and DeRozan, I'd be extremely happy.

A big +1 right here!
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/20/2009  11:17 PM
Posted by Finestrg:
Posted by Allanfan20:

If we somehow kept the 8th pick and ended up with Curry and DeRozan, I'd be extremely happy.

A big +1 right here!

But I tell you what, if we grabbed our guy at 5, now suddenly I might feel a little more comfortable trading down with the 8th pick to maximize value. Say we secured Steph Curry at 5 and then used the 8th pick to grab 2 or 3 lower picks - say something like a package of #8 and filler to Minny for #18, #28 & #45. Or something with Chicago for their 16th & 26th picks. We could then replace Chandler with a capable SF and also possibly add 1 or 2 more players to boot (say Taj Gibson and a shooter like Meeks or McClinton). Maybe that would be the way to go after we pulled off a Chandler trade for the 5th pick. Going as far as we can go in terms of rebuilding the roster and making it as attractive as possible for a 2010 FA is a very important consideration for us IMO...

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-20-2009 11:40 PM]
Wilson Chandler or the 8th pick to move up to #5?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy