[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How about these potential deals to get the Wiz's #5 pick?
Author Thread
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
6/3/2009  8:51 PM
given that there are rumors that the Wiz don't even want a pick back for the #5 how about these deals?

Deal #1:

harrington + duhon + cash for jamison + stevenson + crittenton + #5 pick

i dunno, it's risky, especially if this is just to get curry. jamison is about to turn 33 and then ware taking on his big deal until he's 36. his advanced stats from last year are not that much different than harrington's but he has a better PER and turns the ball over less.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/fc/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1∑=0&p1=harrial01&y1=2009&p2=jamisan01&y2=2009

plus we're taking on stevenson and crittenton's deal which are not helping us.

Deal #2:

harrington + duhon + cash for jamison + haywood + the #5 pick


still seems like it could be a bit much from us even.

jamison's deal is a killer.

Deal #3:

harrington + jeffries + cash for duhon + haywood + #5 pick


the wiz are still saving $ even by bring back jeffries, given jamison's salary increases. he would also helps them defensively as they are worse than us in that area i think. they also don't need haywood with blatche and mcgee, and haywood gives us sorely needed shot blocking and a real inside presence.

Deal 4:

hughes + jeffries + mobley + cash for jamison + etan thomas + haywood + #5 pick.


this would save the wiz even more money than the previous deal, and for the knicks, by adding haywood and thomas along with jamison would significantly toughen our front line, and give us far more shot blocking. thomas is coming of the torn knee so he's a risk, but mobley is useless to us other than giving someone cap space, and thomas' deal ends this year too anyway.

i dunno just brainstorming...

[Edited by - PresIke on 06-03-2009 8:51 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 06-03-2009 8:52 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
AUTOADVERT
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
6/3/2009  8:54 PM
big question and concern is whether it is worth it to do this for jamison and his deal.

we just spent time trying to rid ourselves of z-bo's and jamison's isn't much better and he's older.

Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

6/3/2009  9:43 PM
why would they want to revist hughes or jefferies? the wizards fans would kill them if they gave up a lottery pick and got no pick back unless they get some young stud. they have been down that path of giving up youth for age, and shockingly, it has never worked for them. i dont see a young stud in any of these deals for the blizards to get hot over. i cant see them breaking up the "big three" and give up a pick to get cap relief and bring on some suspect talent.

in deal #1, is curry supposed to be listed? so it would be 3 players and $$ for 3 players and pick?
GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

6/3/2009  10:29 PM
Posted by PresIke:

big question and concern is whether it is worth it to do this for jamison and his deal.

we just spent time trying to rid ourselves of z-bo's and jamison's isn't much better and he's older.

Yeah you're right - I don't think they want any part of Jamison's contract. Plus, any deal with the Wizards will have to include the 8th pick. No deal even gets off the ground if the Knicks don't start with an offer that included the 8th pick IMO.

Maybe something like this (I posted this the other day):

#8, Chris Duhon, a 2010 2nd + cash to Washington for Brendan Haywood and #5.

Washington gets Duhon (about 7 years younger than Mike James who's coming to the end of the line, Duhon's a steady enough PG that would free up Arenas to play more off the ball and concentrate on scoring, plus Duhon's deal expires if he didn't work out or the Wizards decided to go in another direction [Crittenton?]), they jettison Brendan Haywood which frees up time down low for Blatche & McGee, plus at 8 they could get a very good player to help them. We could also expand this by including Nate Robinson -- maybe instead go Duhon, #8, 2010 2nd rounder, cash, for Mike James & #5 then come July agree to trade a resigned Nate for Haywood's expiring and a 2010 1st rounder (top 12 protected say) or at the very least the player we tell them to select this year at #33.

-----------------------

Also, I'm keeping a close eye on what Sacramento eventually winds up doing if I'm Donnie. Someone posted an article the other day where the writer said there's a possibility the Kings decide to part with Jason Thompson in order to move up themselves from the #4 spot. If that went down, we might eventually be able to work something out with Sac. for David Lee in a S&T later on in July (if Thompson got dealt they'd need a PF and they've always liked Lee). Maybe David Lee for the expiring contracts of Abdur-Rahim & Mikki Moore (about $8.6 mil. total) plus two players they draft for us at #23 & #31. Or, maybe Lee straight up for Kenny Thomas' expiring contract (almost the same - right around $8.6 mil.) and the two players they draft at #23 & #31 for us... Do they like Rubio enough where they're prepared to dangle Jason Thompson to move up?? Maybe. We get out from under a long-term David Lee deal and grab two decent players with those picks (maybe a Taj Gibson and a shooter like Meeks or someone else)..

[Edited by - finestrg on 06-04-2009 09:59 AM]
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
6/3/2009  10:29 PM
hughes is a cap move.

jeffries only left the wiz because isiah offered him too much money. he was liked on the team, i believe. plus it's only for a year or two, and the real point is that deal, especially saves them $$$$, big time over the next few years.

yeah, they take jeffries $6.4, but they lose more over time with jamison being gone, and given his age and the team's situation, is he really necessary for the wiz?

the point is they want to save money, as i hear, and jeffries does give them the kind of player they are missing. a defensive minded guy that can guard multiple positions and doesn't need the ball. the problem is for us we don't have enough good scorers. jeffries would be perfect on a team with more established stars.

hughes makes $13.6 mil, and they would also lose mobley's 9.5. yes, etan thomas and haywood are endings, but basically you look at the following years too.

jeffries deal lasts an extra year, where as jamison's goes on for 2 more, and with far more of a raise each year than jeffries gets from next year to the last year of his deal.

basically, with this deal the wiz save just about $17 mil ($16,921,447) not including the $3 mil.

that's no small amount of change.

this gives them more flexibility. but it doesn't give them much in terms of players they can use much out of other than next year.

they have blatche, mcgee and young still to build around, arenas coming back and butler, so maybe they'd rather just get out of jamison's deal. is he really going to be worth his price by the time the wiz get good again?

maybe they will be back in form next year with arenas back, but jamison is no spring chicken, nba wise.

i dunno i was ju

[Edited by - PresIke on 06-03-2009 10:30 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 06-03-2009 10:34 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
martin
Posts: 79866
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/3/2009  11:02 PM
I am thinking that unless the Knicks get a great deal, Duhon sticks with the Knicks. MDA's offense won't run with just a rookie PG.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
6/3/2009  11:16 PM
Posted by Finestrg:
Posted by PresIke:

big question and concern is whether it is worth it to do this for jamison and his deal.

we just spent time trying to rid ourselves of z-bo's and jamison's isn't much better and he's older.

Yeah you're right - I don't think they want any part of Jamison's contract. Plus, any deal with the Wizards will have to include the 8th pick. No deal even gets off the ground if the Knicks don't start with an offer that included the 8th pick IMO.

Maybe something like this (I posted this the other day):

#8, Chris Duhon, a 2010 2nd + cash to Washington for Brendan Haywood and #5.

Washington gets Duhon (about 7 years younger than Mike James who's coming to the end of the line, Duhon's a steady enough PG that would free up Arenas to play more off the ball and concentrate on scoring, plus Duhon's deal expires if he didn't work out or the Wizards decided to go in another direction), they jettison Brendan Haywood which frees up time down low for Blatche & McGee, plus at 8 they could get a very good player to help them. We could also expand this by including Nate Robinson -- maybe instead go Duhon, #8, 2010 2nd rounder, cash, for Mike James & #5 then come July agree to trade a resigned Nate for Haywood's expiring and a 2010 1st rounder (top 12 protected say) or at the very least the player we tell them to select this year at #33.

-----------------------

Also, I'm keeping a close eye on what Sacramento eventually winds up doing if I'm Donnie. Someone posted an article the other day where the writer said there's a possibility the Kings decide to part with Jason Thompson in order to move up themselves from the #4 spot. If that went down, we might eventually be able to work something out with Sac. for David Lee in a S&T later on in July (if Thompson got dealt they'd need a PF and they've always liked Lee). Maybe David Lee for the expiring contracts of Abdur-Rahim & Mikki Moore (about $8.6 mil. total) plus two players they draft for us at #23 & #31. Or, maybe Lee straight up for Kenny Thomas' expiring contract (almost the same - right around $8.6 mil.) and the two players they draft at #23 & #31 for us... Do they like Rubio enough where they're prepared to dangle Jason Thompson to move up?? Maybe. We get out from under a long-term David Lee deal and grab two decent players with those picks (maybe a Taj Gibson and a shooter like Meeks or someone else)..


[Edited by - finestrg on 06-03-2009 10:32 PM]

kby was saying on another forum that he read that the wiz don't want to have any pick in this year's draft because they don't want to pay the $$.

i like the duhon for haywood deal especially if we can keep our #8 pick.

the wiz could be cool with it because they don't really need haywood with blatche and mcgee, but they sure could use someone like duhon, even for 1 year. they could see how a real pg can do with arenas. for us it gets us a shot blocker. however, i feel like the $3 mil is not enough to make it a good deal for the wiz...

how about...

duhon + mobley or q + a future 2nd rounder for haywood + songalia + stevenson + #5 pick


they get 2 endings in duhon and mobley/q and rid of two somewhat overpaid guys (stevenson + songalia) who could be rotation players for us after the 2010 season, and who aren't THAT overpaid.

songalia is an offensive minded team player and efficent scorer who should fit well into mike d's system. he takes most of his shots from the outside, but also can score close to the hoop.
http://www.82games.com/0809/08WAS13.HTM

notice how last year, 87% of his jumpers were assisted as were 73% of close shots. so, we could gather that he doesn't need the ball in his hands to score, which folks who know ball realize means he is active, moving around to get open...perfect for mike d. also notice his eFG% is high earlier in the shot clock and still mostly when assisted from someone else. either way if gallo isn't recovered, ready, or we have foul trouble he could be decent for us and adds some david lee insurance at least in terms of effort, although he doesn't board or block. he seems like a nice player for us, actually.

http://www.82games.com/0708/07WAS5A.HTM
http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/s/stevede01.html

stevenson, from a sophomoric glance fell off big time last year, but hello...back pain...uh oh... well, if he can get back to close to form he might be quite useful under mike d. he LOVES to shoot. remember that youtube shooting contest between he and arenas? arenas won, sure but stevenson didn't suck. also contrary to gilbert, stevenson actually takes a lot of his jumpers assisted. the year before he hurt his back he took 82% of his shots from the outside, but 73% were assisted. He would give us another shooting guard that can slot into the rotation, especially if we lose nate. actually stevenson is a more efficient scorer than hughes.

it's almost little wonder the wiz were a good team for the past few years, because these two players have some decent things that have worked. look at how charlotte got diaw and bell to help them. to me this is a similar move for the knicks.

[Edited by - PresIke on 06-03-2009 11:17 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
6/3/2009  11:30 PM
Jj is a ok defender, you guys are throwing him to trade talks when his stock is- to put it blunt- worth sh.. His time here has been worthless and he's a buy out waiting to happen
ES
sidsanders
Posts: 22541
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2009
Member: #2426

6/3/2009  11:34 PM
duhon + mobley or q + a future 2nd rounder for haywood + songalia + stevenson + #5 pick

blizards cant be that desperate to clear space... 1 player, 1 contract/player, 1 future 2nd for 3 players and a lottery pick? arenas is a ball hog if healthy, i dont see duhon fittin in there well. they missed haywood lots last year. maybe mcgee is ready to step in, we shall see. blatche has the same feel as kwame brown to me: inconsistent, work ethic questions/maturity issues.
GO TEAM VENTURE!!!!!
martin
Posts: 79866
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/3/2009  11:38 PM
Posted by PresIke:


how about...

duhon + mobley or q + a future 2nd rounder for haywood + songalia + stevenson + #5 pick


they get 2 endings in duhon and mobley/q and rid of two somewhat overpaid guys (stevenson + songalia) who could be rotation players for us after the 2010 season, and who aren't THAT overpaid.

I don't mind this deal, but Donnie would have to be VERY sure of who he was getting at #5 and #8. Taking on stevenson + songalia is the difference between signing 1 or 2 big names come 2010.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

6/3/2009  11:49 PM
Posted by martin:

I am thinking that unless the Knicks get a great deal, Duhon sticks with the Knicks. MDA's offense won't run with just a rookie PG.

Are they still looking at the Spanish PG, Cabeza (sp)? He is 28, I think, definitely not a rookie, and very possibly a more efficient player than Duhon. He could play for another 3-4 years at a high level, and let Curry, if that is who decide to take, work himself into the starting position.

If you give up Duhon you have to be getting a veteran PG from some other source, no doubt about it, because MDA would not want a rookie or Nate running the offense.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/4/2009  12:07 AM
personally i don't think any of those deals are realistic unless you're offering those packages to move up 3 slots... we're not just stealing WAS's #5 pick w/o giving up our #8.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
lumbardar
Posts: 20146
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/12/2009
Member: #2561

6/4/2009  1:30 AM
I believe the wizard are not really intersted in this draft because the only 2 players they really wanted were griffin and rubio and they are probally not going to get them. I can see this happening if they can't get a veteran player or rubio and griffin I can see them trading out of this draft completly so it good be easier to get there draft pick. They are also over the cap and they will have to pay the lexury tax and they probally want and expiring contract so my trade proposal is this larry hughes for deshan stevenson, ethan thomas, oleksiy pecherov and the number 5 pick.
Nalod
Posts: 72071
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/4/2009  8:58 AM
I still contend that Rubio can fall to the 5 spot.

If Wiz don't want our pick, then we can do a three way with portland where they can get Curry, we get Rubio, and Washington gets pieces to make a nice run next season.

What does Washington really want is the question? Cap room? Specific Skill set to compliment Arenas?

Portland has the pieces to do many deals but is curry really going in the top 5?

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/4/2009  9:10 AM
I can't believe the wizards aren't interested in this draft - last time I checked, they had a crap record.

In fact, I think the wizards are one of the few teams who are worse off than us in terms of talent & cap considerations.

Arenas? Has he even played in the last two years? Anyone really counting on him playing again?
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
6/4/2009  9:15 AM
i'm counting on arenas playing again, but no where near the level that he left us at. he will slide into obscurity soon enough and that max deal will hamper the wiz for a long time.

on jamison, he's aging and his contract is not favorable to our 2010 plans, i feel, tough it would be nice to get haywood for some blocks.

jamison can be a good role player on a contender at age 36, but his presence on the knicks would prevent us from being that contender.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Nalod
Posts: 72071
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
6/4/2009  4:54 PM
Jamison is going to celebrate his 33rd birthday next week.

If he is not expiring next year then forget it.

Lebron and Holiday/curry/evans is better than

Jamison and Rubio.

Jamison does the same thing as Harrington so there is not need for him.

I only see the wiz dealing with us to get what they want in the 8th spot and lets say Nate. This is contingent on us getting Rubio.

LEbron/Rubio/Gallo is a marketing tour de force!
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
6/4/2009  5:06 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Jamison is going to celebrate his 33rd birthday next week.

If he is not expiring next year then forget it.

Lebron and Holiday/curry/evans is better than

Jamison and Rubio.

Jamison does the same thing as Harrington so there is not need for him.

I only see the wiz dealing with us to get what they want in the 8th spot and lets say Nate. This is contingent on us getting Rubio.

LEbron/Rubio/Gallo is a marketing tour de force!

yeah, i mentioned Jamison's age as a concern too.

He is a bit more efficient player/higher PER than Harrington. He also turns the ball over less.

The question is whether the Knicks think Jamison is good enough to qualify as some kind of second fiddle if they can get Lebron or Wade or Amare, etc.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
Rookie
Posts: 27322
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 10/15/2008
Member: #2274

6/4/2009  5:52 PM
Posted by Nalod:

I still contend that Rubio can fall to the 5 spot.

If Wiz don't want our pick, then we can do a three way with portland where they can get Curry, we get Rubio, and Washington gets pieces to make a nice run next season.

What does Washington really want is the question? Cap room? Specific Skill set to compliment Arenas?

Portland has the pieces to do many deals but is curry really going in the top 5?

Crazy, but I think this has some real possibilities. What if Portland trades all the way down to 2 and takes Rubio. We trade down to 5 and take Curry. We swap Curry for Rubio and some misc pieces get exchanged (maybe a re-signed Lee to Portland for Outlaw). There could be alot of scenarios if all four teams to get what they want.

How about these potential deals to get the Wiz's #5 pick?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy