[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

My Knick Assessment
Author Thread
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
11/22/2003  1:41 PM
Two words: DOWNRIGHT UNWATCHABLE!!!

They've got Houston who is very good, but even when he's on, he doesn't make anybody better. In other words, he has the ability to give himself enough room to shoot, but not the ability to break down defenses & cause the spacing problems & rotation that you see the elite guys cause.

Van Horn is OK...a better fit at the position than Spree. KT tries hard & is effective at times doing the little things.

Besides that, they are a roster full of severely unathletic, unimaginative veterans that would make sense as 10th man on some of the rosters out west.

Even if salaries weren't part of the equation, there's not a roster that I wouldn't taken over the Knicks sorry roster.

I am typically a true blue fan...but I flipped to Boise St versus Fresno St last night because as I said, this team is unwatchable. There not one guy who I consider exciting. Even their kids (who don't play) don't get me psyched. Williams has looked good of late, but he's slow. Sweetney is a slightly taller Weatherspoon. Lampe doesn't dress. Vujanic is scared of the NBA.

What a mess!!
AUTOADVERT
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
11/22/2003  2:34 PM
COrrection: There's not a roster I wouldn't take over the Knicks.
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
11/22/2003  3:44 PM
The thing is our team is missing athletic players (well... except for Shandon Anderson), so we can't play a speed game-- our team is incapable of running. We have a bunch of deliberate players. We're a nice "fundamental" team, but we have no spice.

The media has been playing off the Knicks as arguably one of the most boring teams in the NBA. We continue to be old and predictable. All things considered, in retrospect, we probably should have taken Jarvis Hayes instead of Sweetney--- he would have been better suited to our needs.

With so many swingmen available in the NBDL, it must be rather frustrating for management that we have no roster spots available. We need to dump some players, do a 2-1 trade or something.

Now some trade ideas-- would you try to deal for any of these guys:
Bonzi Wells
Derek Anderson
Ricky Davis
Jamal Crawford
Mo Petersen

IMO, I think we're dreaming if we think Othella Harrington could net us anyone decent. We'd probably need to wait/hope that McDyess is healthy, then package Thomas in a deal (Maybe Thomas/Spoon/lottery protected 1st rounder--- instant frontcourt help). Is there anyone compelling in Dallas? Maybe they'd be willing to trade Jamison in a package, but he still doesn't solve our issues.

We're going to need to make some tough decisions with our starting SG/SFs all banged up. McDyess is going to need a spot soon--- and we might as well get a look at Lampe.

All in all, it's a very frustrating team.
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

11/22/2003  3:45 PM
So why do you continue to watch them? Dolan's gotcha!
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
knickgeek
Posts: 20392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/31/2001
Member: #46
USA
11/22/2003  3:56 PM
I agree with that assessment: UNWATCHABLE.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
11/22/2003  4:18 PM
Posted by playa2:

So why do you continue to watch them? Dolan's gotcha!

Addiction: every 1 in 10 games they give a high.
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
11/22/2003  4:26 PM
We as fans watch games because we were fans long before Dolan even came into the picture. Plus it helps us see the things that need to be changed on this team rosterwise.
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
hDavis
Posts: 20266
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/18/2003
Member: #494
USA
11/22/2003  4:49 PM
I think the knicks are somewhat watchable. It seems like last year we lost a lot of games in the 4th, but we hung in there untill the 4th. A few games this season we got off to bad starts but came back. The knicks are competitive at least. They havent gotten blown out that much. Even against the lakers minus KVH we did ok.
ANOTHER Knick turnover! -Marv Albert
TLover
Posts: 21066
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/12/2003
Member: #381
USA
11/22/2003  4:57 PM
I watched Spree drop 31 last night, instead of the Knicks. I try to watch but I have to change the channel after a while. I'm thinking we probably should have kept Spree, even as an energy guy off the bench. He would be a front-runner for 6th man of he year. We should have made a stronger push for a guy like Radmonvic on the Sonics who can do the same things as VanHorn at the 3 with more upside and better contract. The Sonics need a Kurt Thomas on their team if they want to make a playoff push. We could have traded down with the sonics and picked an athletic player with future potential. Since the Knicks never play young platers it would have made sense to pick up an Outlaw or a Zarko.

Knicks can still make a trade for Radmonvic (Milos is fello country man) and possibly a Ronald Murry (athletic player whose minutes will be cut when Ray Allen comes back) and we can take a Jerome James off their hands. We give up Kurt Thomas, Frank Williams (whose trade value may have increased a bit after Laker performance) and Spoon whose contact is basically being traded for James. Not sure if the #'s work but would be a step in the right direction.

If Jamal Crawford is still on the market a push needs to be made for him

The Knicks mangement has made it extremley difficult with the signings of Spoon, Anderson, Eisley, VanHorn, and Mutombo. These were impulsive moves that keep the Knicks down in a hole and unbearable to watch.


Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
11/22/2003  5:13 PM
Posted by technomaster:

The thing is our team is missing athletic players (well... except for Shandon Anderson), so we can't play a speed game-- our team is incapable of running. We have a bunch of deliberate players. We're a nice "fundamental" team, but we have no spice.

The media has been playing off the Knicks as arguably one of the most boring teams in the NBA. We continue to be old and predictable. All things considered, in retrospect, we probably should have taken Jarvis Hayes instead of Sweetney--- he would have been better suited to our needs.

With so many swingmen available in the NBDL, it must be rather frustrating for management that we have no roster spots available. We need to dump some players, do a 2-1 trade or something.

Now some trade ideas-- would you try to deal for any of these guys:
Bonzi Wells
Derek Anderson
Ricky Davis
Jamal Crawford
Mo Petersen

IMO, I think we're dreaming if we think Othella Harrington could net us anyone decent. We'd probably need to wait/hope that McDyess is healthy, then package Thomas in a deal (Maybe Thomas/Spoon/lottery protected 1st rounder--- instant frontcourt help). Is there anyone compelling in Dallas? Maybe they'd be willing to trade Jamison in a package, but he still doesn't solve our issues.

We're going to need to make some tough decisions with our starting SG/SFs all banged up. McDyess is going to need a spot soon--- and we might as well get a look at Lampe.

All in all, it's a very frustrating team.
Houston and Weatherspoon for Ricky and Big Z...
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
11/22/2003  6:14 PM
Tlover, I am with you on the Spree issue. We should have kept him.
Dolan and LayDown want a team that lacks fire and excitement. As long as the players don't criticize their stupidity and are at least somewhat sheepish, meek, or passive, then they're happy. Fan satisfaction, standings, playoffs and most of all championships be damned.

Regarding Mutombo, I don't look as that as bad a deal as the others because at the time we needed a 5, even though he's old.

Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
11/22/2003  6:33 PM
How is that a realistic trade? :)

As far as Mutombo is concerned, why do we need him if we're going nowhere?

I'll hold off final judgment until McDyess comes back. If he returns and comes back in pre-injury form, perhaps we'll have all of the flava we need.

The weird thing is that in as much as we're starting Eisley, we might as well buy out Ward and give Frank Williams the playing time. It'll give us the extra roster spot for McDyess.
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
knickgeek
Posts: 20392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/31/2001
Member: #46
USA
11/22/2003  7:12 PM
Posted by playa2:

So why do you continue to watch them? Dolan's gotcha!


I keep watching because I'm an idiot - I think a Knick rookie is going to get minutes, turn out to be a great player and we'll get to watch him develop. I think Keith Van Horn is going to go out and prove that he really is a great player after all. I think the Knicks are going to learn how to pass the ball. I think Dice is going to come back and make the Knicks competitive. And I think Chaney's going to figure out how to coach this team.

It's sort of like Lucy & the football - I keep hoping things will be different next time....



[Edited by - knickgeek on 11/22/2003 19:14:47]
martin
Posts: 76265
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/22/2003  8:54 PM
Posted by purple012870:

COrrection: There's not a roster I wouldn't take over the Knicks.

I dont no. Miami is in a bad way.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
bernard
Posts: 20730
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/17/2003
Member: #475
11/22/2003  9:57 PM
Posted by technomaster:

The thing is our team is missing athletic players (well... except for Shandon Anderson), so we can't play a speed game-- our team is incapable of running. We have a bunch of deliberate players. We're a nice "fundamental" team, but we have no spice.

The media has been playing off the Knicks as arguably one of the most boring teams in the NBA. We continue to be old and predictable. All things considered, in retrospect, we probably should have taken Jarvis Hayes instead of Sweetney--- he would have been better suited to our needs.

With so many swingmen available in the NBDL, it must be rather frustrating for management that we have no roster spots available. We need to dump some players, do a 2-1 trade or something.

Now some trade ideas-- would you try to deal for any of these guys:
Bonzi Wells
Derek Anderson
Ricky Davis
Jamal Crawford
Mo Petersen

IMO, I think we're dreaming if we think Othella Harrington could net us anyone decent. We'd probably need to wait/hope that McDyess is healthy, then package Thomas in a deal (Maybe Thomas/Spoon/lottery protected 1st rounder--- instant frontcourt help). Is there anyone compelling in Dallas? Maybe they'd be willing to trade Jamison in a package, but he still doesn't solve our issues.

We're going to need to make some tough decisions with our starting SG/SFs all banged up. McDyess is going to need a spot soon--- and we might as well get a look at Lampe.

All in all, it's a very frustrating team.
Common misconception that because we can't run or jump, we must be fundamentally sound. We're not. We turn the ball over like crazy. Can't dribble, can't pass, can't shoot (except for H20 and Thomas). The lack of fundamentals is what makes the team so frustrating and ultimately boring to watch.
technomaster
Posts: 23348
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
11/23/2003  12:15 PM
Actually, because we're not athletic, we absolutely need to play fundamentally sound basketball every game to win. The lack of athleticism gives us little margin for error.

We're not going to cause turnovers with our reckless energy or run the full length of the court and dunk the ball.

You're right, we don't play fundamental ball... we'd get over this if we had some sheer athletic ability to compensate for our sloppiness.

Without Sprewell, we lost one athletic-style guy. We're trapped playing a half-court game... the only problem with that is in spite of our draft picks and trading Sprewell, we have not yet developed a more effective post presence on offense than last year. That, coupled with nagging injuries to KVH and Allan Houston, have forced us to play ugly.

As an aside, I was reminded that Sweetney recently lost his dad just before the season started; partially as a result of that, I don't really see him contributing too much this year. He probably has too much going through his mind when he isn't playing 'ball for him to be focused on the court. I'd bet Chaney is the only guy on the team who has stepped up on the team as a father figure for him. The difference between him and Lampe/Vranes is that those two guys lived together (w/ Milicic) for 6 weeks leading up to the draft, so they developed a bond there. Sweetney started out all alone.

His body language on the court really stinks... he may still have the ability of an Elton Brand locked away inside, but it could take some time for that to come out.
“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

11/23/2003  2:16 PM
GREAT POINT ON SWEETNEY , THAT COULD VERY WELL BE WHY HE LOOKS Lost.
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
My Knick Assessment

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy