[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Should the NBA keep or change the current lottery system?


Author Poll
PresIke
Posts: 7671
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
What system should the NBA use for new players entering the league?
The current lottery makes the most sense for the NBA, keep it as is.
It can stay, buts. Guarantee the winner a top 3-5 level off the odds for all non-playoff teams in some form to prevent tanking.
Hold an = odds pre-lotto 4 non-playoff teams w/o bottom 3-5 records. Guarantee the winner a top 3-5 draft spot for less tanking.
Freeze the draft order (for non-playoff teams) at the All Star Break to prevent tanking
Get rid of the lotto, keep the draft, and use the same system as the NFL.
Bye bye draft. Allow new players to join teams with cap room + some guaranteed money so any team can compete in signing.
Use the MLB/Premier League-like system and forget the cap. The Knicks are sure to benefit!
Other
View Results


Author Thread
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:35 PM
Whoops...choice 2 should read:

It can stay, but level off the odds for all non-playoff teams in some form to prevent tanking.

in other words, give all non-playoff teams equal chance to win.


[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:41 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
AUTOADVERT
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
5/18/2009  9:37 PM
The lottery is fine, but they should go to 3 rounds in the draft IMO and build out a minors system for player development.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/18/2009  9:37 PM
i say give every team that doesn't make the playoffs an equal amount of ping pong balls in the draft lottery... that will prevent teams from trying to tank to get a better pick while also not rewarding teams for being terrible.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:38 PM
yeah, that's pretty much choice 2.

Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:40 PM
stinks i can't erase a poll, especially when i messed it up...

plus the choices are wordy as all hell...hard to write some of them briefly.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/18/2009  9:40 PM
Posted by PresIke:

yeah, that's pretty much choice 2.

i don't get the guarantee the winner a top 3 option u included tho... the winner of the lottery should get the #1 pick, then u slot in the rest as they are picked out of the hopper until u fill in all the lottery slots is my idea.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:46 PM
yeah, that one is hard to explain (i came up with it today, actually)....makes sense for the nba since it takes a lawyer to understand most of what goes on..lol...

essentially, it works like an opposite lottery for one of the worst teams to get kicked out of the top 3 or 5, while helping one of the teams 6-12 get a better spot.

so what happens is all of the non-playoff teams who don't have the worst 3 or maybe worst 5 records compete in a pre-lottery where all have the same number of chances to get a guaranteed spot in the top 3 (or maybe top 5) in the draft.

so, one of the bottom 3-5 w-l teams is always going to get pushed out of the top 3 or 5, and one of the teams 6-12 always get in.

the idea is to stop the worst teams from tanking, and give non-playoff teams that try to win a better chance at getting a top pick.

[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:46 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:46 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:47 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
5/18/2009  9:46 PM
Posted by VDesai:

The lottery is fine, but they should go to 3 rounds in the draft IMO and build out a minors system for player development.

Absolutely agree.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:52 PM
yeah, folks here definitely know i have strong feelings for getting a real minor league system.

i just think they could do a better job of stopping tanking, and how ridiculous it is for fans of bad teams to actually root against their own team later in the year.

plus, we keep seeing the same teams with the worst records who according to a lot of experts are not really interested in trying to build winning teams unless they get lucky with top 5 picks. while the knicks may be a constant lotto team over the past decade, it at least wasn't done with a lack of interest in trying to win.

compare that with teams like memphis, minnesota, and the clippers, who often wind up in the lotto or top 5. it keeps the best incoming players on crap teams, and then we have to wait or hope for maybe 5 years before those teams might get good...and often it doesn't last long.

to incentivize bad owners who don't even care much about doing what it takes to win it seems pretty unfair.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:52 PM
what are the 3 other answers folks are interested in?

i'm curious.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
orangeblobman
Posts: 27269
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/1/2009
Member: #2539
Nauru
5/18/2009  9:53 PM
i have the perfect solution:

there are 30 teams and 16 make it, so 14 don't

what you do is you have a one game playoffs for the non-playoff teams, the worst 7 have home court. the winner of the playoff gets the first pick. perfect...think of the possibilities.
WE AIN'T NOWHERE WITH THIS BUM CHOKER IN CARMELO. GIVE ME STARKS'S 2-21 ANY DAY OVER THIS LACKLUSTER CLUSTEREFF.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/18/2009  9:54 PM
I want to go back to the envelopes in the the barrel. It was much better like that. This current system promotes tanking.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:56 PM
Knickerblogger offered the idea of freezing the draft order after the all-star break, and i actually voted for that one (although I also like the one with no draft but using cap room + some money allocated by the league every year to sign incoming players).

although i like my idea, it's confusing as all hell, and has some flaws. his idea seems quite sensible, and should at least prevent us from having the ritual of "a real fan roots for the team to lose because a top 5 pick is the only way to get a superstar" vs. "real fans never root against their team" debate.

even the knicks had a shot at the playoffs in january, as he pointed out.

then teams might actually try to win still, which is normal for COMPETITIVE sports, i think, and far more ethical to fans who shell out money and time for the product.

[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:56 PM]

[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 9:57 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/18/2009  9:59 PM
i think if u just give every non playoff team the same amount of ping pong balls & just keep picking until all the lottery slots are filled, it's the fairest & easiest way to stop teams from tanking & ensure that lottery picks are left up to random chance rather than bad teams in bad markets intentionally losing to try & cash in on talented young players & not have to spend money in free agency.

& while we're on that topic, i think there should be a minimum cap figure set on teams that's more proportionate to the median average of salaries in the NBA... if teams are gonna benefit from luxury tax revenue sharing from big market teams that spend a lot on their payroll, then they should be made to spend those shared revenues & invest it back into their rosters.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  9:59 PM
yeah, basically, the need to stop tanking is the key.

it's beyond ridiculous because it's not like the nfl where you only have 16 games, and where 1 player is not going to usually suddenly turn your team around.

the lotto was supposed to prevent tanking, but it's not good enough because of the power of individual players in a game where 1 player can make a HUGE difference.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
5/18/2009  10:07 PM
The only way to make teams compete to the end is kick out 1 worst team out of NBA. This will be fair.
I would kick 4 worst teams right away and create a minor league from them.
Then 2 best team from this minor league will replace 2 worst in each conference next year.

As all the above is impossible I would give the worst team picks 7 and 8 and all the rest can play the lottery 1-6 and 9-14 with equal chances in their group.


[Edited by - arkrud on 05-18-2009 10:07 PM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
5/18/2009  10:11 PM
Posted by VDesai:

The lottery is fine, but they should go to 3 rounds in the draft IMO and build out a minors system for player development.

Agreed but not 3 rounds. NBDL needs to be expanded into something very similar to the MLB minor league system.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
5/18/2009  10:11 PM
actually, someone proposed the idea of regulating the bottom 2 teams in the discussion today on Knickerblogger's site, like they do in many international soccer leagues.

we have no minor league system just yet though, and there were some other issues someone mentioned.

for those interested in reading it here's the post:
http://www.knickerblogger.net/?p=1775


[Edited by - PresIke on 05-18-2009 10:12 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
5/18/2009  10:15 PM
Posted by GKFv2:
Posted by VDesai:

The lottery is fine, but they should go to 3 rounds in the draft IMO and build out a minors system for player development.

Agreed but not 3 rounds. NBDL needs to be expanded into something very similar to the MLB minor league system.

If you have a minor league system with a full squad for 3 teams it only makes sense to have more rounds. The draft is deeper these days anyway because of the international pool.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
5/18/2009  10:18 PM
I don't think a team should be rewarded for sucking. Rewarding a team for suck is plain stupid. That is why every year I propose a reverse order of odds for example the team that just missed the playoffs should be rewarded more than the team that just out and out did crappy.

That is why the envelopes in the barrel system was so much better, lottery should include all teams playoff team also why shouldn't they be rewarded for winning.
Should the NBA keep or change the current lottery system?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy