Ideal draft if we land at # 10
| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
VDesai
Posts: 43301 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
3/23/2009 10:40 AM
I personally like Jonny Flynn over Collison. I was high on Collison for a while, but his luster has come off...he falls a bit short as a playmaker. Lawson improved a lot this year and looks like a true point. 3.4 A/TO from a college player? Wow.
|
|
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 6/14/2005 Member: #910 USA |
3/23/2009 10:51 AM
Aldridge is one of those guys that I hope that we don't pick along with Buddinger and Curry. Not top end athletes to me.
Why doesn't Nick Wise get any love. The kid looks like he's good enough to be in the mix with the other PG's. Alan Hahn:
Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
|
|
franco12
Posts: 34069 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 2/19/2004 Member: #599 USA |
3/23/2009 10:52 AM
Posted by VDesai: We should be able to use cash for picks. If trading Lee/Nate, I agree that better to stagger the picks for future years (especially 2010). |
|
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 6/14/2005 Member: #910 USA |
3/23/2009 11:04 AM
Posted by franco12:Posted by VDesai: Based on the economic and CBA factors, this draft should be packed and 2010 should be weak. I don't get how this is a weak draft. Who cares what players are going top 3? We're not drafting up there. What matters is what we can get at 9 and what we can buy late, and this is a great draft for that. As far as trading Lee and Nate and getting value back for them... NEWSFLASH: There are two teams worse than us in the East. How good are Nate and Lee really? If you change out Brackins for Lee and Maynor for Nate you have a cheaper and I would say potentially better team. We can't get much worse, I know that. Alan Hahn:
Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
|
|
purple012870
Posts: 21778 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/16/2003 Member: #432 |
3/23/2009 11:10 AM
Yeah, I'm not suggesting using Nate/Lee straight up for a mid rounder.
|
|
purple012870
Posts: 21778 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/16/2003 Member: #432 |
3/23/2009 11:19 AM
btw, I'd take Flynn over Lawson ina NY minute (he's just not coming out)
|
|
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 6/14/2005 Member: #910 USA |
3/23/2009 11:36 AM
Posted by purple012870: I would. We're in a corner now as far as what we can get back for them and its not worth it to pay them. Alan Hahn:
Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
|
|
TMS
Posts: 60684 Alba Posts: 617 Joined: 5/11/2004 Member: #674 USA |
3/23/2009 3:52 PM
ideal draft for me would be if we somehow managed to move up to the top 4 by utilizing the assets we have available.
if we could land either Griffin, Derozan, Hill or Jennings i would be ecstatic. After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
|
|
purple012870
Posts: 21778 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/16/2003 Member: #432 |
3/23/2009 4:23 PM
Has Jennings helped or hurt his draft status by heading to Italy for a year?
|
|
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 6/14/2005 Member: #910 USA |
3/23/2009 4:29 PM
Jennings has stayed the same for the most part. Maybe he lost a couple of slots.
Alan Hahn:
Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
|
Ideal draft if we land at # 10