[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I hate to say it, but...
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/18/2009  11:29 PM
i told u guys at the trade deadline that both guys should be traded for extra 1st round picks so that we'd have some pieces to either use in a draft night trade, move up in the lottery, or use to address holes in the roster, & i was pretty much lambasted... now we're seeing kids like Griffin & Derozan looking like future superstars, & w/o those extra picks to parlay w/our own we have much less of a shot to move up in the draft to take a prospect w/that type of potential, or even to make a draft night trade for an already established NBA player.

we're gonna be stuck w/either having to pay over market value to sign Lee & Nate to albatross contracts that will be difficult to move in future years, or watching them leave NY for nothing in return... hate to belabor the point, but i did tell u so.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/18/2009  11:39 PM
You were right. Congratulations

[Edited by - basketballjones on 03-18-2009 23:39]
https:// It's not so hard.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
3/18/2009  11:50 PM
Posted by TMS:

i told u guys at the trade deadline that both guys should be traded for extra 1st round picks so that we'd have some pieces to either use in a draft night trade, move up in the lottery, or use to address holes in the roster, & i was pretty much lambasted... now we're seeing kids like Griffin & Derozan looking like future superstars, & w/o those extra picks to parlay w/our own we have much less of a shot to move up in the draft to take a prospect w/that type of potential, or even to make a draft night trade for an already established NBA player.

we're gonna be stuck w/either having to pay over market value to sign Lee & Nate to albatross contracts that will be difficult to move in future years, or watching them leave NY for nothing in return... hate to belabor the point, but i did tell u so.

Havent you been conversating with people that we don't have to lose them for nothing?

If we don't like the contract that a team signs them to then we can work out a sign and trade after we match...
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/19/2009  5:52 AM
i've been saying that letting them go for nothing is a stupid move & Donnie would be a fool to let that happen... but still that's not gonna make his job any easier now that Lee & Nate pretty much control their own destinies after having put up stats all year long... if we try to sign & trade these guys after we match other teams' offers we still run the risk of having them signed up to over market value contracts that not many teams will want to take on... that's the same kinda problem we've had w/so many other players that have come & gone from here over the past several years.

if we had traded them at the deadline like i was advocating we should we could have had 3 lottery picks in this year's draft to make some significant moves with on Draft Night, or at the very least 2 top 10 lottery picks & another pick in the middle of the 1st round... u wanna tell me that wouldn't give Donnie some great ammo to work some big deals with this offseason?... i don't believe for a second that this is a terrible draft... there are kids coming out this year that IMO can really help this team & be just as good if not better than either Lee or Nate, & a few that have real genuine superstar potential, something neither Lee nor Nate possess... kids with that type of potential are the ones we really need to focus on targetting & making moves to align ourselves to be in a position to acquire... players like Lee & Nate, while talented as they may be, are replaceable IMO.

like i've been saying, if u can sign those guys up to below market value contracts, all power to u, but ur being naive if u think that's gonna happen at this point if u ask me... & w/Donnie's main focus being on preserving cap flexibility in 2010, it's beginning to look more & more possible that he could very well end up letting 1 or both these guys to walk for nothing if the prospect of matching their offers from other teams will hamper our longterm flexibility past the point where he's willing to go.

it's like my worse fears may be coming true this year... we finish w/just enough of a good record to end up w/a crappy lottery pick & end up missing out on all the best prospects, but yet just enough of a bad record to end up just missing out on making it into the playoffs... that dreaded no man's limbo that no team ever wants to find itself in, & that the Knicks have seemingly found themselves in more times than i care to remember over the years.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/19/2009  8:10 AM
Posted by TMS:

it's like my worse fears may be coming true this year

it could be worse . . .

you could have switched over and become a RAPTORS fan this year!!!!!



jimimou
Posts: 23517
Alba Posts: 36
Lame Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/6/2004
Member: #681
USA
3/19/2009  8:50 AM
Posted by Marv:
Posted by TMS:

it's like my worse fears may be coming true this year

it could be worse . . .

you could have switched over and become a RAPTORS fan this year!!!!!




raptor fans are morons....
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/19/2009  8:57 AM
Dude- you don't hate to say it, because you've pretty much been saying the same thing, over and over again.

That said- I think you have a valid, but perhaps overblown fear.

The teams with cap room that might make a run at Lee & Nate- they are many of the same teams in small markets losing money. Given the prospect of a decline in the cap number, I doubt they will be aggressive with their offers.

I think the key thing to remember that with an RFA, we are in the drivers seat. Yes, we could end up over paying for Lee & Nate, but I think that is less likely now, even though they put up great numbers on a losing team, because of the general direction the economy has taken with NBA teams & the future cap.

All that said, your point about the stupidity of trying to make the play offs when we should be in all out tank mode, is all the more valid since 2010 might not bring us any talent, and for us to have any chance of improving before 2011, we need the 2009 pick to be a winner, just like the Gallo pick was so important.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/19/2009  9:23 AM
Lost opportunity... move on. In this case, I'd just sign Nate and Lee to qualifying offers and then let them walk the season after. Get cheap labor from them and they can go earn a contract to go play in Golden State or Memphis or something... because there is NO WAY IN HELL I want either to be a part of the long term. Nate cares more about being KryptoNate--oh, the things he learned from StarBury!!--and Lee cares more about padding his stats than playing defense.

I care more about the jersey than they do... and i refuse to support either. Fuck these guys... I've snapped. Enough is enough, don't let the door hit you on the way out
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/19/2009  9:30 AM
Nate

24.5pts 5.5ass since the Allstar break. He should have been signed before the season to a mid-level extension
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/19/2009  9:32 AM
Posted by MS:

Nate

24.5pts 5.5ass since the Allstar break. He should have been signed before the season to a mid-level extension

Nate, the quintessential Good Stats, Bad Team player. Same with Lee. The two of them are Shareef Adbur Rahims.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/19/2009  10:03 AM
Mo Williams
18pts 4assists

Playing with Lebron Makes you unselfish and an Allstar?

The little guy has actually taken over games and won them.
Papabear
Posts: 24382
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1414

3/19/2009  10:10 AM
Papabear Says

You know I've been listening to some of you guys being cridical about Nate and Lee. Now I see there is some truth to what you are saying. Nate is a talented player but Nate is about Nate. Last night he only had 2 assists in thie whole game. Lee for every rebound he gets and every point he gets he gives up that many to the opposing team. I've seen enough. Yes I would like to see them back but a record we have this season we have a bunch of ego maniacs. Thats what you get when you have a run and gun team. Shoot first and hope that the opposing miss on the other end. We only win games if the opposing team have a bad shooting night or thier star player is down.
Papabear
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/19/2009  10:29 AM
The main problem with Lee and Nate are expectations.
They managed to bring them too high with what they did on the court while playing on garbage team stacked with garbage players.
But in reality they are limited in NBA format game.
Nate has not enough brain to compensate his length limitations.
Lee has no body for any specific NBA position. He can go to Europe and became an all-time star playing for Milan, CSKA, or Makkabi... But in NBA he is in no man land.
2 nice serviceable backups... But there are bunches of idiot GMs in NBA to give them big contracts anyway.
Can Walsh explore these idiots? Will see... This will be an ultimate test for him as GM in NY.


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
3/19/2009  10:35 AM
Stuck with nothing these guys are still tradeable before the whole QO or Extension talks begin. There will be a draft day trade with at least one of Lee or Nate. I'm starting to really wonder if either is someone you want to keep especially at the price tags they may command. Are they better served being used to rid us of Curry and Jeffries? Maybe so. Maybe we should have done the Kenny Thomas / Nate-Jeffries deal. Then you'd just be mulling the age old Curry-Lee for 2010s+a pick type scenario.

Walsh won't overpay for these guys and they're both able to be had if another team makes Walsh a good offer and takes one of our 2011s off our hands with them. I wouldn't be concerned at this point.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
3/19/2009  11:29 AM
the main problem with Lee and Nate is the same thing people have been saying since day one: defense.


Nets: 17 fouls, 7 blocks.
Knicks: 13 fouls (and I'm guessing half of these were offensive), 1 block.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/19/2009  3:11 PM
Posted by franco12:

Dude- you don't hate to say it, because you've pretty much been saying the same thing, over and over again.

yeah, i have been saying the same thing over & over again, because in my heart i believe that was the right move all along... & now it's looking more & more like what i had suggested earlier in the season was the right direction to go in... otherwise we shoulda done what King1's been suggesting all along & sign both those guys to low market contracts after last season... right now i get more the feeling that we backed ourselves into a corner w/these 2 guys by not acting on those 2 opportunities earlier... i hope i'm wrong, believe me... there's nothing i wanna see less than for my concerns to be realized... i don't take personal satisfaction saying I Told You So at the expense of the longterm future of this franchise like some others might around here, trust me on that one.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
3/19/2009  3:15 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by franco12:

Dude- you don't hate to say it, because you've pretty much been saying the same thing, over and over again.

yeah, i have been saying the same thing over & over again, because in my heart i believe that was the right move all along... & now it's looking more & more like what i had suggested earlier in the season was the right direction to go in... otherwise we shoulda done what King1's been suggesting all along & sign both those guys to low market contracts after last season... right now i get more the feeling that we backed ourselves into a corner w/these 2 guys by not acting on those 2 opportunities earlier... i hope i'm wrong, believe me... there's nothing i wanna see less than for my concerns to be realized... i don't take personal satisfaction saying I Told You So at the expense of the longterm future of this franchise like some others might around here, trust me on that one.

I am glad we did not sign them early in the year because then we were committed to them and I'm not so certain either player has proven that they should be a part of building a future contending team. Lee will want big bucks, he wanted it then, and his play is not well-rounded enough to warrant it. Do we want Lee as our starting PF making 10+M a year? No defense? Limited offensive game? Eh, I don't know about that. Nate: For all the stats yet again he's immature, he doesn't run the team, he doesn't know how to involve teammates, he will also command a decent salary and again is this a player you want to commit to? I'm not entirely sure about that.

So I think it was the wise move to continue the Nate/Lee auditions if you will.

Now that they have likely priced themselves out of our market given their stats and shown us they are not worth it given their lack of a well-rounded skill set and mentality - I think we can very easily move them on draft day if there is a valuable trade to be had.

I just don't see the Lee/Nate situations as so cut and dry. There are still multiple options to pursue with both players. The last thing we will do is paint ourselves into a corner over two role player who really belong on the BENCH on any good team.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
3/19/2009  3:34 PM
It would be hard as hell to turn Lee or Nate into Griffin. I'm not that sold on guys that make late season surges, like Derozan, be that as it may we can still swing a deal on draft night to grab him if you dangle either Nate or Lee. Especially Lee.

I wouldnt lose my mind over this. Nate and Lee are two of the better assets in the league.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
3/19/2009  3:41 PM
on most mock drafts, they still have Derozan going in the mid-round.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/19/2009  3:57 PM
Posted by sebstar:

on most mock drafts, they still have Derozan going in the mid-round.

yeah, but on those same mock draft sites he was a pre-season top-5 pick... last year DeAndre Jordan was a the third overall on nbadraft.net and DX. What happens is people get excited about young, athletic guys, and then when they play like young, inexperienced guys they get penalized.

The potential is there with DeRozan. The Knicks don't have a pick next year... so I'm all about swinging for the fences. He was great in the Pac-10 tourney
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
I hate to say it, but...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy