[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

DLee - We've already seen the best he'll ever be
Author Thread
nychamp
Posts: 20565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2009
Member: #2556

3/9/2009  6:44 AM
Unless we can get him for a very good price (let's say $7-8m per for 4-5 years), we need to let him go. We of course should have traded him earlier in the year. Or earlier, for OJ Mayo last draft (if that was actually possible). Though he has some very nice attributes, his shortcomings trump his positives given the type of player he is. On top of that, his positives have been disproportionately showcased this season given the type of team he plays on. I agree with many who have previously posted that he is a nice 6th man type on a good team. On a crap team with no real bigs, and no emphasis on defense (our team), he has been able to rack up big numbers.

This is how I see David Lee:

Positives: Excellent hands, very good (crafty) finisher with both hands, quick release, good offensive rebounder, above average passer for a big. Very good knack for rebounding at both ends. Above average offensive IQ. Good pick and roller. Good hustle overall on offense.

Negatives: Horrendous defender. This cannot be overstated. Probably the worst on the team, and that's saying something. He has a low defense IQ and low effort level when defending. He seems concerned with getting position for the rebound before the opponent shoots. Often does not even put the token hand up. Honestly, it's shameful. A lazy passer at times. Also he has at best an inconsistent mid-range offensive game, something that he will need in order to counter true bigs he plays against.

Trouble is, when you are not a finesse player or a shooter or super athletic, when you're just a hustle/rebounder/blue collar guy, you need to be a defender. He's a "nice" offensive player, but his total lack of defensive ability really outweighs his putbacks and pick and rolls on the offense, especially considering that good teams can shut down the pick and roll when they need to. A while back he was averaging roughly 16 and 12: I'd be surprised to see that as a season avg anytime in the future. I don't think he'll sniff that again, unless he remains on a cellar-dwelling team with no legitimate bigs where he can hoover all misses and get layups.

A 6'9" PF who is routinely abused on defense, is a one- (or one and a half-) dimensional offensive player, and cannot block shots is not a star. He is not a main building block of a young team. He could only really be excellent on a team with a dominant 2-way big at center, like Duncan or Howard, where he can clean up this misses and score on the worse post defender on the other team. In the context of the Knicks he is a fundamentally flawed player for his position. Don't be "mesmerized" by the gaudy stats this year. Get a great price on him (thereby preserving our ability to trade him in the future if necessary) or let him walk.
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/9/2009  7:23 AM
To me, he's a slightly better, glorified version of Kurt Thomas. And you're right, he should be paid like that, and if he somehow manages to get more, we should walk or try to hold out for a S&T.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/9/2009  8:18 AM
Wow usually when you have 19 points 14 rebounds 7 assists and 5 steals and outscore the guy you are guarding---people will lay off a tad. One big problems the Knicks have is the guards---for years cant keep people in front of them--which gives David Lee not only the responsibility of guarding a much bigger player[of which he did a good job stripping several times]but dealing with penetrating guards. In this crazy system Al Harrington is the PF and David Lee is the AC--so if you have problems go talk to Mike Offensive genius who cant even get 7 fairly explosive players to get him to .500 against really bad teams. The play has REGRESSED--that is on the coach. It's his schemes his motivation. He IS one of the worst end of game coaches in the league. Im not saying he's a bad coach but his strategy leaves us in a defensive disadvantage too much. That is why he is gone from Pheonix and why the Bulls shied away. No commitment to defense--its all talk.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 03-09-2009 08:19 AM]
RIP Crushalot😞
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
3/9/2009  9:02 AM
David Lee's ascent has been somewhat Carlos Boozer like. I think you're seeing him make big strides offensively and he's hitting his jumper with more regularity. I think he still has some improvements that he will make.
nychamp
Posts: 20565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2009
Member: #2556

3/9/2009  9:05 AM
Those numbers look pretty, but bottom line they lost an ugly game. That's the thing, he can fill up a stat sheet, but isn't often a game winner. I mean, that had to be one of the most useless 19/14/7 games I have seen. At no time did he give the impression of powering the team towards a win. To be fair, nobody really did yesterday.

And Briggs, I agree D'Antoni is not a good end of game coach. Why the heck are we not giving those fouls at the end of the half?
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/9/2009  9:10 AM
He's a limited player, no doubt. But there is something to be said for maximizing what you got.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
DaJoka
Posts: 20136
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/4/2009
Member: #2399

3/9/2009  9:41 AM
I think when Donnie Walsh is able to flip Lee and Nate for say a Carmelo Anthony...you guys will be happy. David Lee is good period...it's just we keep losing. If we won last night..we would be praising him here for those stats. Nate and Lee are still increasing their trade value and Donnie will capitalize on this.
"Why So Serious" DaJoka
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
3/9/2009  9:43 AM
He's going to continue to get better.

It's a little crazy continuing to put out these threads about Nate and Lee being limited players. Everyone knows that they're limited. Lee is just as tiny as a Center as Nate is at 2guard.

They are limited, but they've played their asses off through many of the worst seasons that we've ever had as a franchise.

What's it worth $ wise? Fortunately the market will decide and again, the market is the worst a free agent could ever go into.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/9/2009  10:21 AM
He will be a good shooter by 2010 and will be hitting that jump shot.

But the fact remains the NBA is in financial trouble 15 teams needed to borrow money. Knicks, Lakers, Dallas, Portland, etc I am sure we can throw a few more teams in there to narrow the list of teams that aren't in trouble but are caped out. Where is this big money offer coming from.

Memphis didn't but together a nice core to use their money on lee, OKC is a possiblity, Detriot isn't giving him cash, so where is the money coming from. He is lucky to get 8 million. Boozer will be the top pf everyone saw what happened to the sixers last season. Teams will get more responsible with money.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
3/9/2009  10:26 AM
Even if a team has the money... why wouldn't you take Wallace for a year over Lee for 5?
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098

3/9/2009  1:08 PM
He can continue to improve in certain ways.

He can continue to improve his jumper, which I expect he will do; he can do some work with the weights, which I don't know if he will do; he can make a commitment to playing better D, which I hope he will do; and he can play the position he is supposed to play- PF, which only MDA can do.

He is a pretty good player- not top of the line, but I feel he is someone that any winning program would want on its team.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
3/9/2009  4:59 PM
Posted by DaJoka:

I think when Donnie Walsh is able to flip Lee and Nate for say a Carmelo Anthony...you guys will be happy. David Lee is good period...it's just we keep losing. If we won last night..we would be praising him here for those stats. Nate and Lee are still increasing their trade value and Donnie will capitalize on this.

I've liked Lee's game since his rookie season, but lately even if we had won the last two games, it's getting tiring watching him guide people to the rim and waving at them as they score; and the at least once a game, running-away-to-make-sure-i-don't-get-posterized is just sick to watch.

I'm rapidly starting to believe this guy would rather ensure he gets his double double than stop anyone from scoring. He'd jump through the backboard to get a rebound, but he stands still watching jumpers go in (which I'm sure he's learned, apparently gets you a better chance of being in position to rebound a miss). And IMO, I don't think you can blame all of it on D-Phony's system.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

3/9/2009  7:35 PM
Red on Roundball....I guess David Lee never saw this one, lol

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
3/9/2009  9:01 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

Red on Roundball....I guess David Lee never saw this one, lol


eny you are so classic.

in case i haven't mentioned it lately . . . I LOVE BILL RUSSELL!!! tied for the all-time greatest player ever with oscar and jordan!! blueseats, where are you man, come on out after me
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
3/9/2009  9:38 PM
I disagree that we have seen the best of Lee. Every year he improves his game.

1. When he first came in he could shoot free throws. He worked on that and now he can.
2. Then Lee had problems scoring in the post. So he developed a post move on the right low box.
3. Lee had problems taking his man off the dribble. Now he is able to go left and right off the dribble to create his own shot.
4. Lee had problems hitting the midrange shot. Now he can knock it down on a regular bases.
5. Lee even has a short jumphook that he can knock down time to time.

This is not a player that is going to stay stagnant.

On defense he has not shown that much growth. However on offense he has made improvements every year. What reason do we have to think he can not get better?

BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/9/2009  10:08 PM
i agree, i don't think we've seen the best of D Lee... i think offensively he's on his way towards being a legitimate go to presence down low in the paint... his midrange shot has come a long way this year & he's starting to hit that shot from different places on the floor & even off the dribble at times... i just really wanna see some improvement on the defensive side of the ball.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
3/9/2009  10:45 PM
Go to presence in the paint? LOL. What? What exactly have we seen from him this year for that to even be remotely close? This guy is a backup. That's it. 6th man. Starter on a mediocre to bad team, backup on a good one. He plays 0 defense. 0. He is more concerned with grabbing the board off the missed shot than putting a hand in someone's face of challenging someone or manning up and defending. He is soft. Call me a hater but I've had enough of this guy and the overrating of him by the entire fanbase. He isn't that good. Not even close.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/9/2009  11:18 PM
Posted by GKFv2:

Go to presence in the paint? LOL. What? What exactly have we seen from him this year for that to even be remotely close? This guy is a backup. That's it. 6th man. Starter on a mediocre to bad team, backup on a good one. He plays 0 defense. 0. He is more concerned with grabbing the board off the missed shot than putting a hand in someone's face of challenging someone or manning up and defending. He is soft. Call me a hater but I've had enough of this guy and the overrating of him by the entire fanbase. He isn't that good. Not even close.

Come on man? Did you eat something bad today?
DLee has no relation to this...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
nychamp
Posts: 20565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2009
Member: #2556

3/9/2009  11:21 PM
Posted by BigC:

I disagree that we have seen the best of Lee. Every year he improves his game.

1. When he first came in he could shoot free throws. He worked on that and now he can.
2. Then Lee had problems scoring in the post. So he developed a post move on the right low box.
3. Lee had problems taking his man off the dribble. Now he is able to go left and right off the dribble to create his own shot.
4. Lee had problems hitting the midrange shot. Now he can knock it down on a regular bases.
5. Lee even has a short jumphook that he can knock down time to time.

This is all true. He obviously has worked hard to become a capable offensive player. A surprisingly versatile offensive threat. The shot still really isn't there, but offensively, I am happy with all the things he can do. But at this important moment for the Knicks and this guy who is riding a wave of stats and popularity, it is dangerous to overlook the huge flaws in his game. If the Knicks were a solid team already, with established 1 and 2 guys, then this is a whole different perspective. I might even be inclined to pay a bit more for an excellent complementary player like Lee.
As the Knicks consider possibly locking him up for several years at big-ish money, his total neglect for defense looms larger than his potential (and likely) improvement on the offense.
So yes, he very likely will improve his game. But the value to the Knicks of those potential improvements is eclipsed by the big problems. And there is no sign he has the desire or ability to improve the most important thing missing from his game. I see no anger, or pride in defense. I see a lot of route running, and going through the motions, showing and returning, very perfunctory. Worse still, he doesn't appear to think that it matters in the slightest. He gets his boards, puts up some points, runs hard, works the refs, etc.
Let's see, maybe the economy is so bad that he can be had for a very reasonable sum, allowing us to still pursue 2 max FAs. If so, beautiful. If not, let's let him go and shoot much higher.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/9/2009  11:25 PM
It is possible that WE saw the best on Lee.
But I am confident that some other team which get him after us will see the best of DLee.
This is what usually happens with Knicks.
No patience - no glory. And this is us
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
DLee - We've already seen the best he'll ever be

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy