[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why the Knicks are mathematically out of the playoffs in the dismal East.
Author Thread
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

2/12/2009  4:09 PM
Miami is 7 games ahead of us. It is obvious that we cannot catch them at #7. So the only teams we can hope to catch are Bucks, Nets, Bulls (all ahead of us right now)

Milwaukee is at #8 has a record of 26-29. They also have a winning streak of 2. Lets for a second visit their record 3 games ago. (since that works in our favor and mathematically it works against them)

They would have a record of 24-28 three games ago having played 52 games and we would have a record of 21-31 with 52 games completed.

Let us assume that both teams remain fairly injury free till the end of the season since that also works only in our favor.

Assuming that Milwaukee proceeds roughly at the same pace....
If they have won 24 out of 52 games, then they will win (24/52) * 82 games by the end of the season = 37.8. Again, giving ourselves some slack.....let us assume that they win 37 games.....not 38.

We are currently at 21 wins out of 52 games. In order for us to beat Milwaukee for the 8th spot, we have to win 38 games (not 37), because they have already won the tiebreaker against us. They are 3-0 against us this season.

So out of the remaining 30 games, we have to win at least 17. That is a winning percentage of 56.6 when our current winning percentage is 40.4!!!!! Out of these 30 games, we have 15 home games and 15 road games left.

On the road, we are 7 of 26 = a winning percentage of 27% and at home we are 14 of 26 which is roughly 54%. Let us increase the winning percentage home AND on the road by 10% each (which would seem to be the best case scenario).

So out of the remaining 15 road games, we would win 37% of 15 = 5.55 games
And out of the remaining home games, we would win 64% of 15 = 9.6 games

That puts us at 15 wins......when what we need is 17.

Time to play Chandler, Gallo and Roberson (probably) major minutes and bring back Patrick Ewing Jr.
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
AUTOADVERT
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
2/12/2009  4:18 PM
Well thought out post. I never thought they'd make the playoffs. I predicted 33 to 37 wins, if they get to 33 and above, I'll be satisfied that it is progress.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/12/2009  4:19 PM
how are we "mathmatically" out again? To say we are incapable of going 17-13 in the last 30 is a bit myopic. Its not likely we're making the playoffs, but its not out of any realm of possiblity, in the slightest.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
2/12/2009  4:23 PM
We're not mathematically out. What you have shown is that it's not likely.
martin
Posts: 79931
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/12/2009  4:28 PM
Posted by sebstar:

how are we "mathmatically" out again? To say we are incapable of going 17-13 in the last 30 is a bit myopic. Its not likely we're making the playoffs, but its not out of any realm of possiblity, in the slightest.

what he meant to say was that we have a better chance of making the playoffs than getting an extra pick out of a Randolph trade.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
KnicksSince88
Posts: 20449
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/18/2007
Member: #1387

2/12/2009  4:43 PM
Well thought out but a couple of problems

Milwaukee has had Redd and Bogut for the majority of the season. And now they do not. So i don't expect them to play at the same clip that they have been. Those are two very key injuries and they will feel it over the final 30

I would look at the Nets and Bulls as the biggest competition for the 8 seed. Take a look at the Nets schedule over the next 20 games. They are going to lose a lot of basketball games in the very near future. Its an absolutely brutal schedule

Its not likely the knicks will make the playoffs, but they are far from mathematically out. And if it takes 17-13 to get it done, they are capable of it. It would take them playing over their head, but the rest of the schedule isn't terribly brutal, they did just recently run off a 6 out of 7 streak before the schedule got incredibly brutal. Lets see how they come out of the all star break. None of these teams competing with them for the 8 seed are markedly better than them

EwingsGlass
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/12/2009  4:43 PM
Posted by Cartman718:

Miami is 7 games ahead of us. It is obvious that we cannot catch them at #7. So the only teams we can hope to catch are Bucks, Nets, Bulls (all ahead of us right now)

Milwaukee is at #8 has a record of 26-29. They also have a winning streak of 2. Lets for a second visit their record 3 games ago. (since that works in our favor and mathematically it works against them)

They would have a record of 24-28 three games ago having played 52 games and we would have a record of 21-31 with 52 games completed.

Let us assume that both teams remain fairly injury free till the end of the season since that also works only in our favor.

Assuming that Milwaukee proceeds roughly at the same pace....
If they have won 24 out of 52 games, then they will win (24/52) * 82 games by the end of the season = 37.8. Again, giving ourselves some slack.....let us assume that they win 37 games.....not 38.

We are currently at 21 wins out of 52 games. In order for us to beat Milwaukee for the 8th spot, we have to win 38 games (not 37), because they have already won the tiebreaker against us. They are 3-0 against us this season.

So out of the remaining 30 games, we have to win at least 17. That is a winning percentage of 56.6 when our current winning percentage is 40.4!!!!! Out of these 30 games, we have 15 home games and 15 road games left.

On the road, we are 7 of 26 = a winning percentage of 27% and at home we are 14 of 26 which is roughly 54%. Let us increase the winning percentage home AND on the road by 10% each (which would seem to be the best case scenario).

So out of the remaining 15 road games, we would win 37% of 15 = 5.55 games
And out of the remaining home games, we would win 64% of 15 = 9.6 games

That puts us at 15 wins......when what we need is 17.

Time to play Chandler, Gallo and Roberson (probably) major minutes and bring back Patrick Ewing Jr.

We may be 'realistically' out of the playoffs, but mathematically we still have a shot. Your math doesn't really help because if you assume the same pace of winning and losing for all teams involved, of course we don't make the playoffs-- that's what the standings are--- that's precisely why we are in 11th place in the conference. All this means statistically is that if the playoffs started today, we wouldn't make the playoffs.

But, because we are 3 1/2 games back, we will not be mathematically eliminated until there are only 3 games left in the season for both teams. 4 games isn't out of the range of possibility-- especially considering that the Bucks are now without Redd and Bogut.

I think the playoffs don't seem realistic (PLAYOFFS!?! DON'T TALK TO ME ABOUT PLAYOFFS!!!!) but mathematically, we still have a chance.

You know I gonna spin wit it
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

2/12/2009  4:58 PM
i am not talking about simply arithmetic math here. apply statistics too guys. apply probability too.
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/12/2009  5:03 PM
Pick #8. That's our pick. Channing Frye. Michael Sweetney...
https:// It's not so hard.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/12/2009  5:38 PM
Posted by Cartman718:

i am not talking about simply arithmetic math here. apply statistics too guys. apply probability too.

I hear you. You can apply probabilities, algebra, geometry, hell, add in some physiology. But, if we are applying the Knicks and the Bucks winning percentages uniformly to the remaining games, you really only need to look at the standings to figure out what that means. Regardless of how many different ways you add up the win total (whether you separate them into home/away; day/night or any other split).

Even if you give the Knicks a 10% bump on both home and away--- the simple truth is to make the playoffs, the Knicks need to win 4 more games than the Bucks, 3 more than NJ, and 2.5 more than Chicago. No matter what, they need to out perform the competition-- if the Bucks win 26 out of 30, we need 30 out of 30. If they win 12 out of 30, we need 16. Its really that simple.

You know I gonna spin wit it
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
2/12/2009  5:50 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by sebstar:

how are we "mathmatically" out again? To say we are incapable of going 17-13 in the last 30 is a bit myopic. Its not likely we're making the playoffs, but its not out of any realm of possiblity, in the slightest.

what he meant to say was that we have a better chance of making the playoffs than getting an extra pick out of a Randolph trade.


Damn, you touchy son.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

2/12/2009  10:55 PM
Posted by EwingsGlass:
Posted by Cartman718:

i am not talking about simply arithmetic math here. apply statistics too guys. apply probability too.

I hear you. You can apply probabilities, algebra, geometry, hell, add in some physiology. But, if we are applying the Knicks and the Bucks winning percentages uniformly to the remaining games, you really only need to look at the standings to figure out what that means. Regardless of how many different ways you add up the win total (whether you separate them into home/away; day/night or any other split).

Even if you give the Knicks a 10% bump on both home and away--- the simple truth is to make the playoffs, the Knicks need to win 4 more games than the Bucks, 3 more than NJ, and 2.5 more than Chicago. No matter what, they need to out perform the competition-- if the Bucks win 26 out of 30, we need 30 out of 30. If they win 12 out of 30, we need 16. Its really that simple.

and what are the chances of us winning 4 games more than the Bucks???.....we are talking about only 30 games here.
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/12/2009  11:23 PM
Posted by Cartman718:

[quote]Posted by Cartman718:


and what are the chances of us winning 4 games more than the Bucks???.....we are talking about only 30 games here.

Without Redd, Bogut and Ridnour? Sessions and Villanueva look good picking up the slack, but c'mon, they don't have enough bodies to take it down the home stretch. I think the liklihood is pretty high. See below. I think there's a good chance they go 10-20. Most of the wins are questionable... and even if the schedule eases up at the end, they are going to tired and already out of playoff contention.

BUCKS SCHEDULE:
Tue 17 @ Detroit --- Loss
Wed 18 vs Chicago -- back to back with injuries, they probably lose--- Loss
Fri 20 vs Cleveland --Loss
Sun 22 vs Denver -- Loss
Wed 25 @ Dallas --Loss
Fri 27 @ New Orleans ---Loss
Sat 28 vs Washington ---Win?
Tue 03 vs New Jersey -- Win?
Wed 04 @ Cleveland ---Loss
Fri 06 @ Chicago ---Win?
Sat 07 vs Golden State -Win?
Tue 10 vs New York --Loss?
Fri 13 vs New Orleans --Loss
Sun 15 vs Boston --Loss
Wed 18 vs Orlando --Loss
Sat 21 vs Portland --Loss
Wed 25 @ Toronto --Win?
Fri 27 @ Orlando --Loss
Sat 28 @ Miami --Loss
Mon 30 @ New Jersey --Win?
Wed 01 vs LA Lakers --Loss
Thu 02 @ Philadelphia --Win?
Sat 04 vs Memphis --Win?
Wed 08 vs Atlanta --Loss
Sat 11 vs Oklahoma City -- Win?
Mon 13 vs Orlando --Loss
Wed 15 @ Indiana --Win?

NY Knicks Schedule-- Our wildcard is Toronto-- we have 4 games against them. Without a doubt the Knicks have to play good ball and win some games, but I think they really only have to go 14-16 to make the playoffs.

Tues 17 vs SA --- Loss
Fri 20 vs Tor --- Win?
Sun 22 @Tor --Win?
Mon 23 vs Ind --Win
Wed 25 vs Orl --Loss
Fri 27 vs Phi --Win
Sat 28 @ Mia --Loss
Wed 04 vs Atl --Loss
Sat 07 vs Char --Win
Sun 08 @ NJ ---Loss
Tues 10 @ Mil ---Win
Wed 11 @ Det --Loss
Fri 13 @ Min --Win
Sun 15 @ Cle --Loss
Wed 18 vs NJ --Win
Fri 20 vs Sac --Win
Sat 21 @ Orl --Loss
Mon 23 vs Orl--Loss
Wed 25 vs LAC -- Loss
Fri 27 vs NO --Loss
Sat 28 @ Char --Win
Mon 30 @ Utah --Loss
Tues 31 @ Den --Loss
Sat 04 vs Tor --Win?
Sun 05 @ Tor --Win?
Tues 07 @ Chi --Win?
Wed 8 vs Det --Loss
Fri 10 @ Orl --Loss
Sun 12 @ Mia --Loss
Wed 15 vs NJ --Win?

Anyway, the Bucks are ravaged with injuries and are going to lose a lot of games they would have won at full strength. The Knicks are a bit more of a crapshoot-- it depends what team shows up to play... but I think we have the much easier schedule.
You know I gonna spin wit it
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/13/2009  10:36 AM
Posted by sebstar:

how are we "mathmatically" out again? To say we are incapable of going 17-13 in the last 30 is a bit myopic. Its not likely we're making the playoffs, but its not out of any realm of possiblity, in the slightest.

Its pretty obvious that you are blind when it comes to the Knicks. They aren't going to get near 17-13 when it comes to the Knicks its always out of the realm of possiblities. Knicks will be lucky to win 5-8 more games the rest of the season. To many hired guns looking out for their own stats to have any continuity as a team. It doesn't matter who the coach is when it comes to the Knicks. As fans of the Knicks we have been through this already. This reminds me of the season before last year. Knicks have the 8th spot Isiah gets his new contract and the Knicks world comes crumbling down.

Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
2/13/2009  10:44 AM
I think we're more likely to catch the Bucks, than we are to catch the Bulls or the Nets.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
2/13/2009  10:56 AM
Posted by Ira:

I think we're more likely to catch the Bucks, than we are to catch the Bulls or the Nets.

catching the Nets depends on whether they keep Wince or not at the trade deadline. I would expect Chicago to be tough.
You know I gonna spin wit it
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/13/2009  11:00 AM
Posted by Ira:

I think we're more likely to catch the Bucks, than we are to catch the Bulls or the Nets.

Bucks are playing pretty good basketball right now. Jefferson, Villanueva and Sessions are putting up solid numbers. It was a blessing in disguise that Redd went out. Look for them to improve as the season goes along.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/13/2009  11:40 AM
We have to play solid ball to make the playoffs. That's the bottom line.

The league is not a charity case.

Gotta stay healthy too. If we have any of the key players out then we're not going to make it.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/13/2009  12:08 PM
We need to go 17-13 at the least to have a shot at the playoffs. Watching this season that would mean we'd probably go 10-10 over 20 over those games - and then need one of those 7-3 streaks in there again to make it happen.

In other words it's now highly unlikely. Especially if it takes 39, 40, 41 wins to make it happen. You can forget about it.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/13/2009  12:12 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

We need to go 17-13 at the least to have a shot at the playoffs. Watching this season that would mean we'd probably go 10-10 over 20 over those games - and then need one of those 7-3 streaks in there again to make it happen.

In other words it's now highly unlikely. Especially if it takes 39, 40, 41 wins to make it happen. You can forget about it.

Although we've had stretches- we have yet to play 500 over such a long stretch of the season.
Why the Knicks are mathematically out of the playoffs in the dismal East.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy