[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

A plate of a Lee and a side of Curry
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/11/2009  7:26 AM
Berman reports that SI reports that in order to get David Lee interested teams have to take Curry also. Sorry but I can't link from my phone. It's in todays Post in the article about Curry.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/11/2009  7:38 AM
So Lee will accept trade only if Eddy will go with him...
Why David need Eddy? To carry the luggage?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
TheGame
Posts: 26651
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
2/11/2009  7:39 AM
I think that has been out there for awhile. Walsh has basically told teams that anyone willing to take Curry can have Lee for cheap. No team wants to touch Curry and his 2 years at $10-11 mill each, especially not with the other issues surrounding him. If Walsh really wants to move Lee, he is probably going to have to back off the Curry stance.
Trust the Process
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/11/2009  8:04 AM
stupid move to trade Lee to move Curry. So, basically we just eliminate talent (lee) to add cap room to attract free agents in 2010 who are going to look at the roster and see garbage?

This 2010 stuff is garbage. We need to look beyond 2010 and find our own star in the draft, either in 2009 or 2011 or beyond. Stop trying to cheat.

And in 2012, what about being players for Chris Paul & Dwight Howard? Give me a line up of Paul, Howard, Lee & two players that emerge from either our roster or the drafts in 09 & 11.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
2/11/2009  8:22 AM
Posted by franco12:

stupid move to trade Lee to move Curry. So, basically we just eliminate talent (lee) to add cap room to attract free agents in 2010 who are going to look at the roster and see garbage?

This 2010 stuff is garbage. We need to look beyond 2010 and find our own star in the draft, either in 2009 or 2011 or beyond. Stop trying to cheat.

And in 2012, what about being players for Chris Paul & Dwight Howard? Give me a line up of Paul, Howard, Lee & two players that emerge from either our roster or the drafts in 09 & 11.

This is true but keeping peple waitng for another 3 years after waiting 10 years already... Isn't it too much?


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/11/2009  9:31 AM
oh boy... now we're talking about 2012?
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
2/11/2009  9:41 AM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

oh boy... now we're talking about 2012?

with the destruction which Isiah & Dolan wrought on this roster, that is being realistic.

I'm all for being a player in 2010, but I don't want to get left with the dregs, and end up like Orlando who set themselves to get Duncan & Hill, and were left with McGrady & a broken Grant Hill.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/11/2009  9:49 AM
This is stupid. I won't trade David Lee. To me David Lee is now untouchable. We need to find a good player to put next to David. getting rid of him just to get rid of Curry is whacko.


In order of the basics--we should look to see if we can be opportunistic at the deadline for picks or younger players with the ending contracts

We need to resign Lee and Nate to contract extensions

We need someone outside of the organization with proven draft skills to have serious input in the next draft after this reach
RIP Crushalot😞
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/11/2009  9:52 AM
Are you really going to kill Isiah for drafting Gallo?

You know that he wasn't his first option. Isiah would have taken Bayless, Randolph or some dude you've never heard of.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/11/2009  10:26 AM
so whoever wants lee, has to not only give him an extension but lay out an extra $20 mil for curry - which basically makes trading lee very unrealistic...
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/11/2009  10:33 AM
Exactly, DJ. No team is going to pay Lee 20-24M per year through 2011. Work with me. You got Curry at 10M-11M per year through 2011 who might never play meaningful minutes ever again. Then you have Lee who will command anywhere from 10-14M per year.

So you're essentially paying 20-24M per year for David Lee. Teams can't afford that. David Lee alone is not good enough to make up for a team to miss out on another 10M per year player to be on the court for them.

It just seems far too unlikely...
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/11/2009  11:55 AM
Sounds like Curry is a poison pill.
https:// It's not so hard.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/11/2009  2:11 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is stupid. I won't trade David Lee. To me David Lee is now untouchable.

u're officially on record... don't let me catch u coming back & saying it was the right move to trade Lee if Donnie does so & we get back a stud player & do ur usual twisting in the wind shpiel... u've changed ur mind so many times on trading Lee it's laughable at this point.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
2/11/2009  2:30 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by BRIGGS:

This is stupid. I won't trade David Lee. To me David Lee is now untouchable.

u're officially on record... don't let me catch u coming back & saying it was the right move to trade Lee if Donnie does so & we get back a stud player & do ur usual twisting in the wind shpiel... u've changed ur mind so many times on trading Lee it's laughable at this point.

So BRIGGS no longer wants to send Lee to Utah?
https:// It's not so hard.
A plate of a Lee and a side of Curry

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy