[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

2010: LeBron, Bosh, Eddy Curry AND Lee?
Topic LOCKED
Author Thread
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
1/31/2009  11:05 AM
This is a very interesting way to keep Lee by using the qualifying offer. Check the full article for the details but here is a bit and the steps (Beginning is missing):
So, one way for the Knicks to re-sign David Lee while also signing two marquee free agents and not somehow getting rid of Eddy Curry would be the to have enough space left under the cap, notwithstanding Lee’s cap hold, to sign two free agents and then Lee, who I’m assuming in this exercise will take the Knicks one year qualifying offer this summer.

What’s that you say? David Lee’s cap hold would have to be pretty thin to fit under the cap after signing two max players and still having Curry eat the cap like so many big-macs? Well, I’m here to tell you that Lee’s cap hold under this scenario will be just $6,973,329.

David Lee’s cap hold is calculated by applying the scale set forth by the collective bargaining agreement and multiplying by the “free agent amount“, which for Lee will be 300% of his salary. As the 30th pick in the 2005 draft, Lee makes $1,788,033 this season, his fourth year option year, as mandated by the rookie scale. The qualifying offer is 30% higher than this years’ salary. The cap hold is 300% of your expiring players’ salary (if that salary is less than the league average). In this case, Lee’s salary under the qualifying offer is $2,324,443. 300% of that is $6,973,329.

And what is Jared Jeffries scheduled to make in 2010? The answer is $6,883,400. Clearly, then, the key in this scenario is to trade Jeffries for an expiring deal. Doing that, combined with the expected relief of losing Stephon, Q, Jerome, Harrington, Thomas, Malik, Duhon, and Roberson should create the space necessary to sign 2 max free agents despite Lee’s cap hold.


So, here is how the scenario plays out:

1. The Knicks trade Jeffries for an expiring deal.

2. David Lee does not sign an extension this summer, nor does he sign as a restricted free agent with another team. This would make him an unrestricted free agent in 2010.

3. The Knicks sign two marquee free agents in 2010, preferably LeBron James and Chris Bosh.

4. Under a conservative estimate, the Knicks have between $9-$10 million left under the cap, enough to fit Lee’s salary cap hold so that they can go over the cap to sign him. Heck, they could even give him the max!

5. The Knicks sign a RJ or a Rudy Gay or a Mike Miller or Randy Foye to the full mid-level.

6. The Knicks sign Steve Nash to the veterans’ minimum.

7. The Knicks sign Ray Allen to the bi-annual exception.

8. The Knicks field a team of Stephon Curry, Mike Miller, LeBron James, David Lee, Chris Bosh, Wilson Chandler, Danilo Gallinari, Ray Allen, Steve Nash, Eddy Curry (the new Jerome) and maybe Nate Robinson or whoever he is traded for.

Now, this assumes that Lee will play along by not demanding an extension this summer and not sign an offer sheet with another team. It’s unlikely, bit it does happen, as with Ben Gordon this past summer (though Gordon did not want it that way). Nor can Lee pull a Boozer on the Knicks and flee the scene when he’s unrestricted after entering into a wink wink deal.

But anyway, that’s how you keep Lee without having to trade Curry.

Fin.

http://www.knicksfan.net/

EMS
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/31/2009  11:13 AM
Then Lee has a career ending injury and loses out on $60 mil?! No human will take that risk. He may like the Knicks enough to give them something like a 10% hometown discount but no one should expect more than that.
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27728
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
1/31/2009  11:41 AM
His math is wrong. He is counting dollars coming off the cap, not dollars specifically under the cap. I don't have time to show the math again, but in one of the other 'we need to keep DLee threads' I spelled it out pretty clearly.



[Edited by - ewingsglass on 01-31-2009 11:46 AM]
You know I gonna spin wit it
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/31/2009  1:23 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Then Lee has a career ending injury and loses out on $60 mil?! No human will take that risk. He may like the Knicks enough to give them something like a 10% hometown discount but no one should expect more than that.

Yeah, there's no shot in hell Lee takes the QO, and nor should he be obliged to. He's earning every dollar he's going to make.

I can understand why Nate might do it, but even though since he's a little man, I wouldn't take the QO. With the way he plays, one big fall from him, and he could be toast, in terms of his career.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
martin
Posts: 79941
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/1/2009  7:00 PM
hey guys, I am locking this thread cause the analysis has too many mistakes. Horrid.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Topic LOCKED
2010: LeBron, Bosh, Eddy Curry AND Lee?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy