Posted by Allanfan20:
To me, I'd rather keep Lee then dump him just to get rid of a contract, and ONLY for a first round pick, especially in a questionable draft.
I'd rather keep him, and if it means having the ability to just sign 1 FA, then so be it.
Curry is literally untradeable at this point anyway, with that lawsuit. Keep Lee. I'd love to have Nate too, but if you gotto trade him, then do it. Obviously wait for him to get hot though.
You don't trade players who are playing like stars, for 1st round picks. It's bad business.
that's just it tho... we've had D Lee around for a few years now & we've consistently been a horrible team... is it smart to sacrifice a plan to bring in a top name FA to hold onto this guy? in my mind it's not, & i love D Lee just as much as the next guy... i just gotta face facts, i dunno if this guy will ever be the type of impact player we need in our front court to win consistently... he's definitely talented & he plays the game the right way, but will it be smarter to trade him while his value is at its peak, or to sign him up when his value is at its peak?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.