Nedyal1
Posts: 20243
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/22/2003
Member: #463
|
Chaney goes with vets and either succeeds, or does not and gets dumped. If some vets do well, they are better valued in a trade. With Brendon Malone, the age of the rookie coach and his rookie players then emerges. Knicks still suck, but vets are benched or dumped in trades. Blame is diverted and hope installed which will sell some tickets, and get talk of draft again. contracts still expire at seasons end.
If Chaney goes with Rookies and lose, the vets fume with cause, lose value in trade possibility, and the garden is miserable.
Chaney wins, garden is happy, rooks are still learning and playing in practice, and contracts are ticking off the clock at seasons end. Plan then gets pushed off a year, but pipeline is still strong, money is made, rooks are still developing.
Milos and a mid level pick is not terrible additions.
Dice is the key here. Gonna take 30 games to see this one through. Even if Chaney gets a one yr extention, its plausable. If no extension, almost a lock (my scientific theory).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE PROBLEM AT HAND MUST BE SOLVED WITH A HIGHER LEVEL OF THINKING THAN THAT IN WHICH IT WAS CREATED: ALBERT EINSTIEN
|