[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

New Yorkers please help me out.
Author Thread
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/7/2008  3:59 PM
Why does everyone think two free agents are going to leave their team and come to New York with no supporting cast. You havent won a championship in 35 years and you have no supporting cast for these superstars. Why wouldnt a player want to go play with Brandon Roy, Chris Paul, or Al Horford instead of Gallinari and Chandler? Free agents usually dont leave that often but everyone seems to think that the Knicks get to pick who they get then free agency starts. For all that NYC has to offer you have Allan Houston as a major free agency signing Jerome Jones, Chris Childs, and Jared Jeffries. Why is history going to reverse itself and send two free agents to New York?
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:02 PM
why do u think holding onto D Lee is a better option than having the cap space to go after 2 bigname FA's is my question.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/7/2008  4:04 PM
Because I think getting one big time free agent is feasible not two. I think you sign Lee at the four go get a defensive minded big, play Wilson and the three and Gallinari, and have Duhon and a free agent like Johnson or Lebron and you still have money left over to spend the next year.
Knicksfansince94
Posts: 20615
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 10/7/2008
Member: #2261

12/7/2008  4:08 PM
If you recall, the Celtics were built in a day last pre-season.

You worry about watching the games, enjoying the pace, the change, the fun; let Walsh worry about how he's gonna put the team together.

Also, Walsh moved two fat contracts in one sleepy Friday. He can work wonders!

[Edited by - knicksfansince94 on 12-07-2008 4:09 PM]
my first signiature
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:09 PM
i think we can still hold onto D Lee & have the cap space for 2 bigname guys, but we gotta get creative & dump Curry's contract somehow & also trade Nate for a pick if we can... dumping Jefferies' contract is impossible so that's not an option... we HAVE to clear cap space for 2010 & nothing we do until then should take more precedence over that singular goal.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/7/2008  4:18 PM
Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/7/2008  4:24 PM
With the exception of Ewing and you cant put him in the top 25 all the other players have done quite all right without NYC. Jordan, Johnson, Bird, Jabbar, Dr.J, Shaq, Duncan, all seem to have had money and fame. I think these guys want to win and NYC doesnt offer that.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/7/2008  4:27 PM
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:28 PM
we can end up w/2nd tier guys in 2010 & still field a very competitive team... it's not all in for Lebron or Bosh here... obviously those guys are the big prizes but we can still be very good w/o them... we won't have any of them if we extend Lee & Nate to extensions though.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/7/2008  4:31 PM
Posted by King1:

With the exception of Ewing and you cant put him in the top 25 all the other players have done quite all right without NYC. Jordan, Johnson, Bird, Jabbar, Dr.J, Shaq, Duncan, all seem to have had money and fame. I think these guys want to win and NYC doesnt offer that.

History is not on NY side at all as far as basketball. Furthermore, the NBA Commissioner went on record saying that playing for the Knicks is overrated because medium has changed.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/7/2008  4:36 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


Huh? What does the Burress really reflect about NY more than it reflects upon Burress' stupidity?
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
12/7/2008  4:38 PM
Posted by King1:

With the exception of Ewing and you cant put him in the top 25 all the other players have done quite all right without NYC. Jordan, Johnson, Bird, Jabbar, Dr.J, Shaq, Duncan, all seem to have had money and fame. I think these guys want to win and NYC doesnt offer that.

We'll see...the Knicks have had money in the free agent in years, and only really had it once...and when they did they attracted they were able to bring in a young 2G who hadn't entered his peak (Houston), trade for LJ and sign Childs who was coming off a big season (though that was a stupid signing at the money). They haven't had any money to spend since then. That was over 12 years ago and they haven't been any where near under the cap since.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/7/2008  4:39 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


I doubt that seriously, Can you imaginge winning a ring in ny as a player. I know for a fact that everyones perception on Chris duhon has change, as a matter of fact, if you don't thingk the knicks right now as is, is not enough to lure FA's, then your not paying attention. If we had soild steph playing right now we would certianly have won half the games we loss.


ES
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:45 PM
Posted by King1:

Because I think getting one big time free agent is feasible not two. I think you sign Lee at the four go get a defensive minded big, play Wilson and the three and Gallinari, and have Duhon and a free agent like Johnson or Lebron and you still have money left over to spend the next year.

i don't think u would actually... at the most u would have the MLE which we would have even if we were capped out after 2010 anyway.

max FA ~$17 mil
Lee ~$10 mil
Wilson $2 mil
Gallo $3 mil
Jefferies $7 mil
Curry $11 mil
Duhon ~$9 mil (if he keeps playing like this)
'09 draft pick ~$2.5 mil

that's ~$62 mil committed to 8 players on the roster, leaving u w/only about $3 mil leftover depending on what the cap is that year or the MLE to fill the other 4 roster spots... u can see how much of a hindrance D Lee & Curry's contracts will prove to be to any chances of landing another bigname FA in 2010.

having the flexibility to land 2 bigname FA's in 2010 is a much better attractor for any FA to want to come here than to have someone like D Lee on the roster to play with if u ask me... if we have the ability to sign only 1 guy i think there's much less of a chance we'll land any of them at all.

[Edited by - TMS on 12-07-2008 1:50 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:46 PM
Posted by knicks1248:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


I doubt that seriously, Can you imaginge winning a ring in ny as a player. I know for a fact that everyones perception on Chris duhon has change, as a matter of fact, if you don't thingk the knicks right now as is, is not enough to lure FA's, then your not paying attention. If we had soild steph playing right now we would certianly have won half the games we loss.



Eli Manning went from being a guy who would never be able to "hack it" in NY or ever be as close to as good as his big brother Payton to now being a "winning QB" & a true franchise QB in the span of 1 year... he did that by winning a championship in NYC.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/7/2008  4:47 PM
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


Huh? What does the Burress really reflect about NY more than it reflects upon Burress' stupidity?

Players in most cities have more of a luxury to be their own person. NYC does not afford that person that opportunity. I met several players while in Atlanta and was told that they didn't care for NY. In other cities these guys are celebrated while in NYC, you have the mayor of the city holding press conferences about your legal trouble.

[Edited by - pharzeone on 12-07-2008 4:48 PM]
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  4:51 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


Huh? What does the Burress really reflect about NY more than it reflects upon Burress' stupidity?

Players in most cities have more of a luxury to be their own person. NYC does not afford that person that opportunity. I met several players while in Atlanta and was told that they didn't care for NY. In other cities these guys are celebrated while in NYC, you have the mayor of the city holding press conferences about your legal trouble.

[Edited by - pharzeone on 12-07-2008 4:48 PM]

some players will definitely be scared off by the media scrutiny in NYC, no doubt about that... Lebron is definitely not gonna be 1 of them... he thrives on the media attention & he relishes it.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
12/7/2008  4:56 PM
Posted by knicks1248:
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by VDesai:

Money and FAME. Making you're name in NYC vs. New Orleans or Atlanta carries quite a different cache. And the Knicks have a top notch coach that many players would like to play for. If they can maneuver away Curry and Jeffries and have Nate, Lee, Chandler, Gallo and a no.1 pick here for 2 guys to play with, that is a fairly solid core.

The Knicks don't have to get 2 big name FA's in 2010- but they can. Having the space in 2010, 2011 etc. will put themselves in a position to build themselves back up.

The Burress incident is not helping attracting FAs either. NYC is not thought about that well once you get outside of it. Not like New Yorkers like to think it is. Guys are more than happy hanging out in New Orleans or Atlanta than you think or want to believe.


I doubt that seriously, Can you imaginge winning a ring in ny as a player. I know for a fact that everyones perception on Chris duhon has change, as a matter of fact, if you don't thingk the knicks right now as is, is not enough to lure FA's, then your not paying attention. If we had soild steph playing right now we would certianly have won half the games we loss.



You can doubt it all you want but it is true. That is part of that elitist attitude that New Yorkers have. "You got to come to NY to make it." "You can only win big in NY." Not true at all anymore. Jordan made millions selling his shoes from Chicago and won quite fine. Kobe doing well in LA without the lure of NY. Eli Manning won a SB in NY and is not getting the marketing offers that many thought he would have or should have gotten by now. A player promotes themselves not a city.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/7/2008  5:05 PM
Eli Manning won a SB in NY and is not getting the marketing offers that many thought he would have or should have gotten by now.

u sure about that?

http://www.nj.com/giants/index.ssf/2008/10/new_york_giants_manning_outshi.html
New York Giants' Manning outshining Pittsburgh's Roethlisberger when it comes to endorsements
by Jenny Vrentas/The Star-Ledger
Wednesday October 22, 2008, 10:52 PM
Gene J. Puskar/Associated PressPittsburgh QB Ben Roethlisberger doesn't mind having a lower profile than Eli Manning.

Since February, Eli Manning has been dramatized in a Gatorade commercial, glammed-up in a $1,895 Ermenegildo Zegna trench coat for his spread in the September issue of Men's Vogue and had his 6-4 likeness crafted at Madame Tussauds wax museum in Manhattan.

He now regularly buys Toyotas in your living room every Sunday afternoon during the Giants game, playing paper football with and awkwardly chest-bumping a salesman. He has also "chased the dream" and become a two-sport athlete with older brother Peyton by joining the Double Stuf Racing League, chiding the Williams sisters throughout.

Yep, you could say earning the title of Super Bowl MVP at age 27 opens a lot of doors off the field, too.

"Before last year, there were three quarterbacks that stood out (to advertisers): Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and Brett Favre," said Darin David, an account director for the sports division of the Dallas-based agency The Marketing Arm, which brokers endorsement deals. "But Eli has stepped up to the elite group of quarterbacks in a short time."

When the Giants travel to Pittsburgh this weekend, Manning will face another young quarterback who knows what it's like to lead his team to a Super Bowl victory. And a week's worth of relentless comparisons between Manning and Ben Roethlisberger will focus primarily on their statistics. For the record, Roethlisberger has more regular-season victories as a starter (44 to 35), touchdown passes (93 to 85) and yards (12,836 to 12,774).

But there's another quantifiable degree of separation between the 2004 draftees: marketing pull. While Roethlisberger's Super Bowl XL title in his second season made him the toast of the Quarterback Class of 2004 and the NFL's youth movement, Manning's star power now shines much brighter.


This year, Manning will pull in $7 million in endorsements, while Roethlisberger will make just $2.5 million, according to Sports Illustrated's Fortunate 50 list, which ranks the top-earning American athletes. (Roethlisberger's overall ranking of 15th is higher than Manning at 50, but that list measures total earnings. Roethlisberger has already signed a new, long-term contract while Manning's mega-dollar extension is yet to come).

Manning also registers far higher on the Davie Brown Index, an independent measure put out by The Marketing Arm to give companies an idea of which celebrities are best able to influence consumers and brand. This fall, Manning scored a 73.92, just behind Favre (75.52) and Peyton (78.18). Roethlisberger, meanwhile, was scored at 44.48.

"I don't mind where I'm at," Roethlisberger said of the publicity he receives in general. "I don't want to be out there like that."

Being out there is one effect of playing in the New York market, where Manning instantly became a metropolis-wide hero after Super Bowl XLII. Manning benefits, too, from the cachet of his family name. It has also been nearly three years since Roethlisberger earned his ring.

So far, Manning hasn't gone crazy with endorsement opportunities but has kept a pace more befitting him. Peyton, on the other hand, will earn $13 million in endorsements this year, according to the Fortunate 50 list, prompting Eli to joke on ESPN that Jamaican sprinter Usain Bolt "runs like my brother runs to endorsement opportunities."

"I don't think you'll see (Eli) out there as much as his brother," said Bob Dorfman of San Francisco-based ad agency Baker Street Partners, who authors the annual Super Bowl Sports Marketers' scouting report. "I don't think Eli has that personality."

Among the quarterbacks drafted in 2004, though, Manning's appeal is at the head of the class. Of course, neither he nor Roethlisberger thinks much of the usual round of comparisons this week, four and a half years after they were both invited to Madison Square Garden's Green Room.

"They're always going to compare," Manning said. "When we're done playing, they'll probably look at our careers and compare who's done what and what not. But, again, that's nothing for me to get concerned with. I'm trying to win games for the Giants; he's trying to win games for the Steelers. That's all a quarterback can do."

Well, that, and maybe sell a few Toyotas on the side, too.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Uptown
Posts: 31375
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

12/7/2008  5:16 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by King1:

Because I think getting one big time free agent is feasible not two. I think you sign Lee at the four go get a defensive minded big, play Wilson and the three and Gallinari, and have Duhon and a free agent like Johnson or Lebron and you still have money left over to spend the next year.

i don't think u would actually... at the most u would have the MLE which we would have even if we were capped out after 2010 anyway.

max FA ~$17 mil
Lee ~$10 mil
Wilson $2 mil
Gallo $3 mil
Jefferies $7 mil
Curry $11 mil
Duhon ~$9 mil (if he keeps playing like this)
'09 draft pick ~$2.5 mil

that's ~$62 mil committed to 8 players on the roster, leaving u w/only about $3 mil leftover depending on what the cap is that year or the MLE to fill the other 4 roster spots... u can see how much of a hindrance D Lee & Curry's contracts will prove to be to any chances of landing another bigname FA in 2010.

having the flexibility to land 2 bigname FA's in 2010 is a much better attractor for any FA to want to come here than to have someone like D Lee on the roster to play with if u ask me... if we have the ability to sign only 1 guy i think there's much less of a chance we'll land any of them at all.

[Edited by - TMS on 12-07-2008 1:50 PM]

Excellent point. Forget about Chandler and Gallo, but the idea that Lebron and Bosh can play together on the same team should be very attractive to both of them, regardless of city, etc. Bosh has never played with anyone the callibre of James and vice-versa. That in itself is attratcive to both. Once those two players are in tow, with an owner like Dolan, Walsh can then overspend for role players to fill out a championship roster. That would be spending wisely.
New Yorkers please help me out.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy