[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Trade D Lee now for a 1st rd. pick & draft kids like Derozan, Jennings &/or Patrick Patterson
Author Thread
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  5:48 AM
a move like this would not only free up cap space to target a Lebron, Bosh or Wade in 2010, but it will also bring us 2 topnotch young athletes to rebuild this team from the ground up, the way it should have been done to begin with.

this year should be looked upon as a throw away season to be used to set ourselves up for a year down the road... we should be looking ahead to making moves like this to free up money in 2010 & gaining more picks to truly rebuild this team, & not just add a cosmetic touch-up to hide the flawed foundation that Isiah left behind.

if things go right we finish w/a bad enough record this season to land a top 5 pick, which we use to draft 1 of these guys, either one who may end up to be franchise calibre talents to build around:






then u use the second pick u got from the D Lee trade to take this guy... how good would this manchild look in a Knicks' uniform throwing down like a nasty young Sean Kemp on guys in the paint? plus he blocks shots, something we desperately need... this kid is a freak:




Seriously, a team w/either Brandon Jennings or Demar Derozan, Patrick Patterson, Wilson Chandler, Gallo & Nate as the core can provide a ton of excitement in 2009, & would really revive this stuck in the mud franchise in a huge way... & w/the cap flexibility to make real impact moves in 2010 u also have the assets at your disposal to land an elite name like a Lebron or Bosh via sign & trade if it comes down to that... or u can try to sign those guys outright... u make a move like this & u easily have the cap space to target a bigtime talent in 2010, whether that be Lebron, Bosh, Wade or someone else... any combination of teams u put together w/that formula would look so much better than what we have right now IMO...

either way, what are the possible downsides to this type of plan? i don't see any... i love David Lee more than any other Knick but we all have to think about the team first & not just on 1 individual player, whether that be a guy we like or one we don't.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  6:06 AM
i'm so sick of the "let's wait & see how this season pans out" approach before deciding on moves to make for the future... is it going to kill us to be PROACTIVE for once & take a shot at moves like this for that huge payday later? what possible good is it going to do us to just stand pat & keep going along the path we're currently on other than having to witness crappy season after crappy season w/no hope of ever landing a true franchise talent to build around?

BE PROACTIVE DONNIE! trust my ninja skillz.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
11/4/2008  6:50 AM
Agree.
knicksbabyyeah
Posts: 21472
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/19/2001
Member: #100
Netherlands
11/4/2008  7:00 AM
+1
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
11/4/2008  7:51 AM
That's not a bad idea. We might be able to get a young center or guard for him as well - maybe someone like Jason Thompson and Sacramento's first round pick - or a deal with the Sixers that includes Speights.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/4/2008  9:00 AM
If Lee is getting traded then you better see Curry or Crawford or Zach out the door with him - AND - a 1st round pick STILL coming back along with cap relief for those other players.

Otherwise, unless you are talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in a loaded draft, there's really nothing to talk about.

In hindsight we could have selected Lee at #8 and not Frye and at this point everyone NBA wide would agree Lee was worth every bit a #8 pick...so unless something amazing is coming back pick wise - OR - we're shipping garbage out with him - no reason to trade him.

I believe given how much money he wants on a new contract it would more than likely be in our better interests to pursue moving him whereas in the past I might have been against that.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  9:09 AM
Posted by Cosmic:

If Lee is getting traded then you better see Curry or Crawford or Zach out the door with him - AND - a 1st round pick STILL coming back along with cap relief for those other players.

Otherwise, unless you are talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in a loaded draft, there's really nothing to talk about.

In hindsight we could have selected Lee at #8 and not Frye and at this point everyone NBA wide would agree Lee was worth every bit a #8 pick...so unless something amazing is coming back pick wise - OR - we're shipping garbage out with him - no reason to trade him.

I believe given how much money he wants on a new contract it would more than likely be in our better interests to pursue moving him whereas in the past I might have been against that.

i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

if u include 1 of our bad contracts in the deal, all the better.

[Edited by - TMS on 11-04-2008 06:12 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/4/2008  9:13 AM
Posted by TMS:


i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

I think that would only be wise if Curry or Zach or Crawford went out the door with him and returned that 2010 flexibility along with the 1st rounder.

Otherwise I don't see the point unless you're confident we would let lee walk on an outrageous offer sheet this summer thus losing him for nothing - so at least a mid 1st rounder would be "something". ?

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  9:13 AM
but i forgot, we're going to make that blockbuster trade someday to land Michael Redd & Eric Dampier & get us that championship we've all been waiting for... can't wait for that to happen.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  9:16 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TMS:


i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

I think that would only be wise if Curry or Zach or Crawford went out the door with him and returned that 2010 flexibility along with the 1st rounder.

Otherwise I don't see the point unless you're confident we would let lee walk on an outrageous offer sheet this summer thus losing him for nothing - so at least a mid 1st rounder would be "something". ?

as it stands now D Lee will be wanting a big payday... i don't think Walsh believes he's worth that type of investment, or he would have signed him up already IMHO... i think Donnie & MDA really wanna try & be players in the 2010 FA market even tho no moves have been made yet to get there... if that's the case then this plan of action would make sense in my view... if we can land another 1st rounder for D Lee then it would set us up well for the longterm future, even tho some might think it's craziness to trade our best player for an unproven draft pick.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

11/4/2008  6:45 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TMS:


i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

I think that would only be wise if Curry or Zach or Crawford went out the door with him and returned that 2010 flexibility along with the 1st rounder.

Otherwise I don't see the point unless you're confident we would let lee walk on an outrageous offer sheet this summer thus losing him for nothing - so at least a mid 1st rounder would be "something". ?

as it stands now D Lee will be wanting a big payday... i don't think Walsh believes he's worth that type of investment, or he would have signed him up already IMHO... i think Donnie & MDA really wanna try & be players in the 2010 FA market even tho no moves have been made yet to get there... if that's the case then this plan of action would make sense in my view... if we can land another 1st rounder for D Lee then it would set us up well for the longterm future, even tho some might think it's craziness to trade our best player for an unproven draft pick.

You gotta do it bro. I agree 1000%. If something comes up that makes sense for Lee, you pull the trigger. I want an infusion of youth, youth and more youth. Infusion of youth and shedding salary - that should be the rebuilding gospel for the Knicks. I think David Lee may never have more value than he does right now - a good case could be made that he's pretty much at his ceiling right now - undersized but fairly athletic 4 with plus rebounding and passing skills, smarts and a slow but steadily improving offensive game with the improved jumper and FT shooting (although I remain skeptically how much better he really gets offensively from where he's at right now - the jumper's far from a go-to weapon yet and he still has no post moves/pet moves down on the block to speak of. But the work ethic's certainly there so further improvement's not out of the question). You know what, that's solid. That's good value. There's plenty of teams around the league who could use that type of package in a player - up to Walsh to go out and find the best scenario that works for us and our future. Remember we could've netted the 5th pick in the draft for this kid and turned it into OJ Mayo until Lee and the agent nixed it.

I wish we could keep him; I'd hate to see him go. But you're right TMS, he's gonna want big money and I just don't see breaking the bank to keep a player with his limitations. Bottom line is this isn't MLB, it's the NBA where the salary cap means eveything - you don't give a decent or pretty good player world-class money - that's how you cripple your franchise. You can just tell that the Knicks and Lee are worlds apart on a number, probably why Walsh chose to suspend talks for the time being. If we were talking a top-flight bonafide NBA PF in his prime, a gamechanger/franchise player, then you pony up the bread. But Lee, improvement and all, is far from that. Remember for all the good Lee brings to the table he's replaceable - I gave a list last year of about 40-50 similar players around the league that have the ability to more or less give you the same type of production given the same amount of playing time. I'd shop him and shop him hard. Only thing I fear is that when it comes down to it, other teams are going to want to go the sign and trade with anything Lee - Walsh will have to resign him then we'll be forced to take back another team's contract(s) to balance the deal, much in the same way Isiah acquired Crawford from the Bulls. Hopefully we can swing something simple on a smaller scale where we're only talking Lee (and his current contract) for inexpensive/young players and/or draft picks but something tells me it'll be more involved than that. We'll see what happens, but yeah, Donnie's gotta start by dangling him out there and see what he can come up with. When you're a rebuilding club that's in flux like the Knicks you can't amass enough young players with promise and draft picks, that's for sure...
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
11/4/2008  7:06 PM
Hasheem Thabeet will be a Knick and I know that will make one particular poster a very happy man
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/4/2008  7:09 PM
I'm on board with this TMS. I'm tired of trying to figure out what the hell is going to happen though. Too much **** goes on with this team and it's starting to wear on me.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  7:09 PM
Posted by Finestrg:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TMS:


i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

I think that would only be wise if Curry or Zach or Crawford went out the door with him and returned that 2010 flexibility along with the 1st rounder.

Otherwise I don't see the point unless you're confident we would let lee walk on an outrageous offer sheet this summer thus losing him for nothing - so at least a mid 1st rounder would be "something". ?

as it stands now D Lee will be wanting a big payday... i don't think Walsh believes he's worth that type of investment, or he would have signed him up already IMHO... i think Donnie & MDA really wanna try & be players in the 2010 FA market even tho no moves have been made yet to get there... if that's the case then this plan of action would make sense in my view... if we can land another 1st rounder for D Lee then it would set us up well for the longterm future, even tho some might think it's craziness to trade our best player for an unproven draft pick.

You gotta do it bro. I agree 1000%. If something comes up that makes sense for Lee, you pull the trigger. I want an infusion of youth, youth and more youth. Infusion of youth and shedding salary - that should be the rebuilding gospel for the Knicks. I think David Lee may never have more value than he does right now - a good case could be made that he's pretty much at his ceiling right now - undersized but fairly athletic 4 with plus rebounding and passing skills, smarts and a slow but steadily improving offensive game with the improved jumper and FT shooting (although I remain skeptically how much better he really gets offensively from where he's at right now - the jumper's far from a go-to weapon yet and he still has no post moves/pet moves down on the block to speak of. But the work ethic's certainly there so further improvement's not out of the question). You know what, that's solid. That's good value. There's plenty of teams around the league who could use that type of package in a player - up to Walsh to go out and find the best scenario that works for us and our future. Remember we could've netted the 5th pick in the draft for this kid and turned it into OJ Mayo until Lee and the agent nixed it.

I wish we could keep him; I'd hate to see him go. But you're right TMS, he's gonna want big money and I just don't see breaking the bank to keep a player with his limitations. Bottom line is this isn't MLB, it's the NBA where the salary cap means eveything - you don't give a decent or pretty good player world-class money - that's how you cripple your franchise. You can just tell that the Knicks and Lee are worlds apart on a number, probably why Walsh chose to suspend talks for the time being. If we were talking a top-flight bonafide NBA PF in his prime, a gamechanger/franchise player, then you pony up the bread. But Lee, improvement and all, is far from that. Remember for all the good Lee brings to the table he's replaceable - I gave a list last year of about 40-50 similar players around the league that have the ability to more or less give you the same type of production given the same amount of playing time. I'd shop him and shop him hard. Only thing I fear is that when it comes down to it, other teams are going to want to go the sign and trade with anything Lee - Walsh will have to resign him then we'll be forced to take back another team's contract(s) to balance the deal, much in the same way Isiah acquired Crawford from the Bulls. Hopefully we can swing something simple on a smaller scale where we're only talking Lee (and his current contract) for inexpensive/young players and/or draft picks but something tells me it'll be more involved than that. We'll see what happens, but yeah, Donnie's gotta start by dangling him out there and see what he can come up with. When you're a rebuilding club that's in flux like the Knicks you can't amass enough young players with promise and draft picks, that's for sure...

Finest, that's exactly what i'm talking about... we see perfectly eye to eye on this one.

as for having to S&T Lee, that's not really much of an issue... all u need to do is make sure u're getting that pick back in return & u can pretty much find a whole buncha teams that have players w/contracts that expire after next season to add in as filler... if u do that u are making actual impactful moves to get under the cap in 2010 & accumulating assets to rebuild this franchise... if u don't do anything ur stuck w/pretty much the same crap we have right now for the next 3 years... which direction would u rather go? to me it's a no brainer.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/4/2008  7:13 PM
Posted by Finestrg:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TMS:


i'm not talking about trading Lee for a guaranteed top 3 pick in the draft... i'm talking about trading Lee for a lower lottery pick or mid 1st round pick & then sucking bad enough this year to land our own top 5 pick w/the one we already own... if u do that u can realistically land 2 of those players i just mentioned above & work towards gaining the cap flexibility to make a move for a bigname in 2010.

I think that would only be wise if Curry or Zach or Crawford went out the door with him and returned that 2010 flexibility along with the 1st rounder.

Otherwise I don't see the point unless you're confident we would let lee walk on an outrageous offer sheet this summer thus losing him for nothing - so at least a mid 1st rounder would be "something". ?

as it stands now D Lee will be wanting a big payday... i don't think Walsh believes he's worth that type of investment, or he would have signed him up already IMHO... i think Donnie & MDA really wanna try & be players in the 2010 FA market even tho no moves have been made yet to get there... if that's the case then this plan of action would make sense in my view... if we can land another 1st rounder for D Lee then it would set us up well for the longterm future, even tho some might think it's craziness to trade our best player for an unproven draft pick.

You gotta do it bro. I agree 1000%. If something comes up that makes sense for Lee, you pull the trigger. I want an infusion of youth, youth and more youth. Infusion of youth and shedding salary - that should be the rebuilding gospel for the Knicks. I think David Lee may never have more value than he does right now - a good case could be made that he's pretty much at his ceiling right now - undersized but fairly athletic 4 with plus rebounding and passing skills, smarts and a slow but steadily improving offensive game with the improved jumper and FT shooting (although I remain skeptically how much better he really gets offensively from where he's at right now - the jumper's far from a go-to weapon yet and he still has no post moves/pet moves down on the block to speak of. But the work ethic's certainly there so further improvement's not out of the question). You know what, that's solid. That's good value. There's plenty of teams around the league who could use that type of package in a player - up to Walsh to go out and find the best scenario that works for us and our future. Remember we could've netted the 5th pick in the draft for this kid and turned it into OJ Mayo until Lee and the agent nixed it.

I wish we could keep him; I'd hate to see him go. But you're right TMS, he's gonna want big money and I just don't see breaking the bank to keep a player with his limitations. Bottom line is this isn't MLB, it's the NBA where the salary cap means eveything - you don't give a decent or pretty good player world-class money - that's how you cripple your franchise. You can just tell that the Knicks and Lee are worlds apart on a number, probably why Walsh chose to suspend talks for the time being. If we were talking a top-flight bonafide NBA PF in his prime, a gamechanger/franchise player, then you pony up the bread. But Lee, improvement and all, is far from that. Remember for all the good Lee brings to the table he's replaceable - I gave a list last year of about 40-50 similar players around the league that have the ability to more or less give you the same type of production given the same amount of playing time. I'd shop him and shop him hard. Only thing I fear is that when it comes down to it, other teams are going to want to go the sign and trade with anything Lee - Walsh will have to resign him then we'll be forced to take back another team's contract(s) to balance the deal, much in the same way Isiah acquired Crawford from the Bulls. Hopefully we can swing something simple on a smaller scale where we're only talking Lee (and his current contract) for inexpensive/young players and/or draft picks but something tells me it'll be more involved than that. We'll see what happens, but yeah, Donnie's gotta start by dangling him out there and see what he can come up with. When you're a rebuilding club that's in flux like the Knicks you can't amass enough young players with promise and draft picks, that's for sure...

This was a fantastic post Finest. I totally agree with you.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  7:15 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Hasheem Thabeet will be a Knick and I know that will make one particular poster a very happy man

i would have no problem whatsoever replacing D Lee w/Hasheem Thabeet... that would improve our defense tremendously... w/our own pick hopefully we can land that franchise G this team desperately needs.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

11/4/2008  7:44 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Hasheem Thabeet will be a Knick and I know that will make one particular poster a very happy man

i would have no problem whatsoever replacing D Lee w/Hasheem Thabeet... that would improve our defense tremendously... w/our own pick hopefully we can land that franchise G this team desperately needs.

Agreed. It's early, but as of right now Thabeet (NCAA's best shot-blocker, possibly a more complete Dikembe Mutombo - a guy that's made tremendous strides two summers in a row now) and Jennings (a lefty PG nbadraft.net says is close to Kenny Anderson skill-wise - might be one of the better PGs in the draft) are my guys for the draft next summer.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

11/4/2008  7:48 PM
Well I already poster a thread on this you bastards!

Wilson and Gallo are the future of this franchise for the next few seasons. Knicks need to trade the guy now and look to get some of the big talent in the lottery.

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nykbasketball
Posts: 20413
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/30/2005
Member: #862
USA
11/4/2008  8:03 PM
The player we should be targeting is Ricky Rubio. He is a lock to go either 1 or 2 though. He is the perfect point guard for this system, imo better than nash because rubio is a better defender and create turnovers and fast breaks with his defense. PLUS he is only 18.
What's Defense?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/4/2008  8:15 PM
i'll be happy w/any combination of guys like Jennings, Rubio, Derozan, Thabeet, Patterson, Mullens, Griffin, etc.... this season we have a very realistic shot at getting at least 1 if not 2 of those guys.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Trade D Lee now for a 1st rd. pick & draft kids like Derozan, Jennings &/or Patrick Patterson

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy