Pacers reportedly targeting Al Harrington: (See the link for yourself)
How about I post 50 links where Randolph or Marbury is traded? Maybe Harrington ends up back with the pacer maybe he doesn't. If he is traded back it will be for very unequal value, but it is possible.
As for Marcus Williams, I said initially that he has "underachieved".. however, you can't deny that he is young and talented. I Don't think he is worst than every guard on this team "skill wise". My opinion, what would be the risk? He is an expiring contract. If he is a flop.. we have him on the books until seasons end, expediting our goal for 2010. Honestly though, I don't think he is as bad as you make him out oohah. But hey, this is a hypothetical trade scenario anyway. What about the other parts in the trade?
Everybody in the NBA is young and talented. Second he is as bad as I say. He had everything handed to him and he lost his position as backup PG to journeyman Eddie House who isn't even a PG and Darrel Armstrong who is 100 years old. The Nets gave up on him to sign Keyon Dooling who isn't that good either. Then in Golden State Marcus Williams has already lost his spot to a rookie who nobody knows about!
He is actually worse than I say. look at him play, he would be the worst defensive player in the Knicks backcourt and that is an indictment if I ever wrote one. Second he sports worse percentages than Jamal Crawford. I don't want to claim or reclaim him.
He is no longer an underachiever. he is a poor player.
As for the other parts of your trade scenario, I don't think they are realistic as constructed.
However, I like the idea of losing Eddy Corny in any way we can.
I like the idea of getting a real shooter in Bellinelli but it is starting to look like he isn't really an NBA player.
I don't have an opinion on Anthony Randolph.
I actually like Nesterovic, but I don't see the Pacers giving up on their most serviceable center.
In addition, I don't think we have the roster spots for 4 players if we only trade 3. But if we cut Williams immediately you might be onto something.
oohah