Posted by Pharzeone:
Checketts can say all he want about the situation but his hands are just as dirty. Grunfeld wanted to fire Van Gundy, who was hiding behind Ewing. The Dolans were tired of the "Team Turmoil" headlines in the newspapers. Checketts met with Jackson in a hotel. Too many witnesses. Van Gundy's pal Francesa did a whole show about the meeting. That's when my opinion of Van Gundy went south on that day. The guy whined and weaseled for his job. Van Gundy had Ewing and Houston on his side. Ernie and Ewing were at odds of some sorts. Checketts fired the guy who he could get away with and save face with the press. Checketts tried to pull that stuff about Dolan's input but Francesa and Ruso shot him down rather quickly.
[Edited by - pharzeone on 10-22-2008 01:52 AM]
sounds like you are not a van gundy fan. LOL. well, if they had to fire the two, it would have to be grunfield. van gundy coached his butt off and since he left the team has been reeling ever since. i respect grunfield and he was by far the best gm we had since he was fired ( walsh's plan need to come into fruitation first before we start anointing). there is no doubt that he would have had a better plan and we would be in the hunt for a championship right now because he used to always think two steps ahead, even though it went against the popular vote ( oakley- camby, starks- sprewell). so in hindsight it would have been better to fire van gundy but van gundy was terrific when he was here so i can't be mad at him either. a lot of woulda coulda with this article and it makes you think about what would have happened. most likely if grunfield didn't get fired and van gundy did, the team would flounder and ewing would have been traded quickly. they would have started the rebuilding process then. so would we have been the team that is on the rise now? did that one championship run to the finals mortgage our future of the franchise for 10 years? hmmmm.