[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

How about David Lee to the LA Clippers
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2008  8:04 PM
For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
LivingLegend
Posts: 26573
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 8/13/2007
Member: #1645

8/2/2008  8:49 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Not a bad thought. I guess it depends on what the Knicks think of Jordon's potential.

The pick would obviously be nice to have and we certainly need a long, big defensive presense that could block some shots around the hoop. Another upside - depending on your view of things - could be that moving Lee free's up Zach for a bunch of minutes and productivity (assuming he's not moved). I think part of Zach's issue last year was that Lee was the Knicks golden boy and he was always lurking if Zach started slowly or did something wrong. It's never easy to play when you've got someone looking over your shoulder.

I wouldn't be upset if this deal went down. Wonder if the Clippers would feel like doing it though. They move 2 valuable and cheap assets for good young power forward that will be demanding a big contract next year. Plus - Lee would have to come off the bench behind Camby and Kaman. Not sure Clippers would like this deal - we'd probably need to add something nice to the deal and we don't have much nice lying around.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2008  8:58 PM
Posted by LivingLegend:
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Not a bad thought. I guess it depends on what the Knicks think of Jordon's potential.
The pick would obviously be nice to have and we certainly need a long, big defensive presense that could block some shots around the hoop. Another upside - depending on your view of things - could be that moving Lee free's up Zach for a bunch of minutes and productivity (assuming he's not moved). I think part of Zach's issue last year was that Lee was the Knicks golden boy and he was always lurking if Zach started slowly or did something wrong. It's never easy to play when you've got someone looking over your shoulder.

I wouldn't be upset if this deal went down. Wonder if the Clippers would feel like doing it though. They move 2 valuable and cheap assets for good young power forward that will be demanding a big contract next year. Plus - Lee would have to come off the bench behind Camby and Kaman. Not sure Clippers would like this deal - we'd probably need to add something nice to the deal and we don't have much nice lying around.


The Clippers have a history of taking players who are a year out of getting paid.
If he is the third wheel there--then the market can set his price. The Clippers are a team that changes over every couple of years so this is a type of move that would be up their alley. I had soured on Jordan but he really played well in the pro set SL and when he plays within himself--he has a LOT of potential. If we can somehow muster up 2-3 picks for next years draft---we can then think about pairing one to get rid of Randolph if need be as well.
Keeping Lee is going to cost us 9mm per
RIP Crushalot😞
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/2/2008  11:14 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by LivingLegend:
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Not a bad thought. I guess it depends on what the Knicks think of Jordon's potential.
The pick would obviously be nice to have and we certainly need a long, big defensive presense that could block some shots around the hoop. Another upside - depending on your view of things - could be that moving Lee free's up Zach for a bunch of minutes and productivity (assuming he's not moved). I think part of Zach's issue last year was that Lee was the Knicks golden boy and he was always lurking if Zach started slowly or did something wrong. It's never easy to play when you've got someone looking over your shoulder.

I wouldn't be upset if this deal went down. Wonder if the Clippers would feel like doing it though. They move 2 valuable and cheap assets for good young power forward that will be demanding a big contract next year. Plus - Lee would have to come off the bench behind Camby and Kaman. Not sure Clippers would like this deal - we'd probably need to add something nice to the deal and we don't have much nice lying around.


The Clippers have a history of taking players who are a year out of getting paid.
If he is the third wheel there--then the market can set his price. The Clippers are a team that changes over every couple of years so this is a type of move that would be up their alley. I had soured on Jordan but he really played well in the pro set SL and when he plays within himself--he has a LOT of potential. If we can somehow muster up 2-3 picks for next years draft---we can then think about pairing one to get rid of Randolph if need be as well.
Keeping Lee is going to cost us 9mm per

It is no doubt Lee is our biggest problem.
He is the main reason why Zack was not playing like superstar and Eddy was confused.
His bad look over the shoulders killed all out team chemistry... This white rich fr...n Golden Boy is so annoying...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
8/2/2008  11:23 PM
The problem is, with Gallo on the team there is no longer any need for Lee. They are redundant.
https:// It's not so hard.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2008  11:36 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

The problem is, with Gallo on the team there is no longer any need for Lee. They are redundant.

It's not that Lee is some kind of redundancy--he's a unique player. The problem is I dont want to pay him and I think that we need to secure a promising 5 for 2010. The plan cannot be having Lee Chandler and Gallo as the starting frontline because they will get mauled. Every time we play a big team we cant match up and we have no shotblocking. The Clippers are a NOW team and Lee is much better than Jordan NOW--it's a very good deal for the Clippers. We can bring Jordan along slowly this year with the right mentoring skill and physical training. You cant go half arse--it' either you rebuild the team or you don't Certainly David Lee is not what is wrong with this team but he's also the best chip. Getting a a very athletic 5 who has so much potential especially in up tempo and adding a solid pick next year WITHOUT having to pay David lee his 6 years 54mm so we can still keep in play for 2010.
RIP Crushalot😞
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
8/2/2008  11:36 PM
There not redundant, but Lee certainly is obsolete with the new and improved T2 coming in to play Finesse Forward.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/2/2008  11:39 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by LivingLegend:
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Not a bad thought. I guess it depends on what the Knicks think of Jordon's potential.
The pick would obviously be nice to have and we certainly need a long, big defensive presense that could block some shots around the hoop. Another upside - depending on your view of things - could be that moving Lee free's up Zach for a bunch of minutes and productivity (assuming he's not moved). I think part of Zach's issue last year was that Lee was the Knicks golden boy and he was always lurking if Zach started slowly or did something wrong. It's never easy to play when you've got someone looking over your shoulder.

I wouldn't be upset if this deal went down. Wonder if the Clippers would feel like doing it though. They move 2 valuable and cheap assets for good young power forward that will be demanding a big contract next year. Plus - Lee would have to come off the bench behind Camby and Kaman. Not sure Clippers would like this deal - we'd probably need to add something nice to the deal and we don't have much nice lying around.


The Clippers have a history of taking players who are a year out of getting paid.
If he is the third wheel there--then the market can set his price. The Clippers are a team that changes over every couple of years so this is a type of move that would be up their alley. I had soured on Jordan but he really played well in the pro set SL and when he plays within himself--he has a LOT of potential. If we can somehow muster up 2-3 picks for next years draft---we can then think about pairing one to get rid of Randolph if need be as well.
Keeping Lee is going to cost us 9mm per

It is no doubt Lee is our biggest problem.
He is the main reason why Zack was not playing like superstar and Eddy was confused.
His bad look over the shoulders killed all out team chemistry... This white rich fr...n Golden Boy is so annoying...

arkud---that Anjica guy is brutal--and LB was going to take him 9th? Charlotte has nothing and Anjica will be in YF league[as in YMCA in France]--that is when the guys in the D league take you apart. Nice choice there.
RIP Crushalot😞
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/3/2008  7:16 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by LivingLegend:
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Not a bad thought. I guess it depends on what the Knicks think of Jordon's potential.
The pick would obviously be nice to have and we certainly need a long, big defensive presense that could block some shots around the hoop. Another upside - depending on your view of things - could be that moving Lee free's up Zach for a bunch of minutes and productivity (assuming he's not moved). I think part of Zach's issue last year was that Lee was the Knicks golden boy and he was always lurking if Zach started slowly or did something wrong. It's never easy to play when you've got someone looking over your shoulder.

I wouldn't be upset if this deal went down. Wonder if the Clippers would feel like doing it though. They move 2 valuable and cheap assets for good young power forward that will be demanding a big contract next year. Plus - Lee would have to come off the bench behind Camby and Kaman. Not sure Clippers would like this deal - we'd probably need to add something nice to the deal and we don't have much nice lying around.


The Clippers have a history of taking players who are a year out of getting paid.
If he is the third wheel there--then the market can set his price. The Clippers are a team that changes over every couple of years so this is a type of move that would be up their alley. I had soured on Jordan but he really played well in the pro set SL and when he plays within himself--he has a LOT of potential. If we can somehow muster up 2-3 picks for next years draft---we can then think about pairing one to get rid of Randolph if need be as well.
Keeping Lee is going to cost us 9mm per

It is no doubt Lee is our biggest problem.
He is the main reason why Zack was not playing like superstar and Eddy was confused.
His bad look over the shoulders killed all out team chemistry... This white rich fr...n Golden Boy is so annoying...

arkud---that Anjica guy is brutal--and LB was going to take him 9th? Charlotte has nothing and Anjica will be in YF league[as in YMCA in France]--that is when the guys in the D league take you apart. Nice choice there.

When the full moon is rising people make bad choices...
But never forget that smart man always can fight his demons…
.



[Edited by - arkrud on 08-03-2008 07:18 AM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/3/2008  1:35 PM
Lee's not going anywhere.
I'll never trust this' team again.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/3/2008  10:18 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

The problem is, with Gallo on the team there is no longer any need for Lee. They are redundant.

how are they redundant? they both play a completely different style of game & do different things well... they can easily coexist on the same roster & be effective in their roles.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
8/3/2008  11:15 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by BasketballJones:

The problem is, with Gallo on the team there is no longer any need for Lee. They are redundant.

how are they redundant? they both play a completely different style of game & do different things well... they can easily coexist on the same roster & be effective in their roles.

Everything which in not fit into BRIGGS Lee-out plan is wrong.
So let him talk and feel heappy for now.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/3/2008  11:52 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

The problem is, with Gallo on the team there is no longer any need for Lee. They are redundant.

How do ya figure? Lee's a power and Gallinari is a SF just like Chandler. It's more of a Gallinari-Chandler competition. It would be foolish to let Lee go. I hope he starts, just to despise all who dislike him. And why the dislike' I have no idea.
I'll never trust this' team again.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
8/4/2008  12:08 AM
You guys have no sense of humor.
https:// It's not so hard.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/4/2008  12:12 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:

You guys have no sense of humor.

look who's talking Mr. "I've never went over 100 in a 55 zone" Jones.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
8/4/2008  12:14 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by BasketballJones:

You guys have no sense of humor.

look who's talking Mr. "I've never went over 100 in a 55 zone" Jones.

You're right. I did miss the humor in that.
https:// It's not so hard.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
8/4/2008  12:30 AM
Gallinari was drafted to replace Lee. You have to look no further then knowing that Lee was traded for the 5th pick before he complained. Is coach wants guys who can score, dribble and pass........ that ain't Lee.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
8/4/2008  8:26 AM
Posted by Anji:

Gallinari was drafted to replace Lee. You have to look no further then knowing that Lee was traded for the 5th pick before he complained. Is coach wants guys who can score, dribble and pass........ that ain't Lee.

Before we replace Lee with Gallo, lets find out if he can even play at the NBA level. He barely lasted half a summer league game.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
8/4/2008  8:31 AM
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Rather than just 'dumping' Lee like they did with Balkman, I think we should think about packaging him with Curry, if the assumption is we are stuck with Zach & Zach fits better in D'Antoni's system than Curry.

Curry & Lee for a decent first rounder and legit, unflashy vet shouldn't be a bad deal - someone like a Reggie Evans.

Also, Briggs, as far as not wanting to pay Lee, personally, I partly agree, but the problem I have is I'd rather pay Lee than Zach or Curry, so its tough for me to accept trading someone like Lee while we still have Zach & Curry on this squad.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/4/2008  8:36 AM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by BRIGGS:

For their 2009 1st round pick and Deandre Jordan. That gives the Clippers the quality third man upfront and hedges them against injury.

Rather than just 'dumping' Lee like they did with Balkman, I think we should think about packaging him with Curry, if the assumption is we are stuck with Zach & Zach fits better in D'Antoni's system than Curry.

Curry & Lee for a decent first rounder and legit, unflashy vet shouldn't be a bad deal - someone like a Reggie Evans.

Also, Briggs, as far as not wanting to pay Lee, personally, I partly agree, but the problem I have is I'd rather pay Lee than Zach or Curry, so its tough for me to accept trading someone like Lee while we still have Zach & Curry on this squad.

I would not call Deandre Jordan and an a LA Clipper # 1 pick in 2009 any kind of dump. Jordan should've been a top 20 pick and the LA Clippers wont be better than 16-18 and probably more like 10-14. Its a shot at getting two lottery picks our own and theirs plus adding a very nice 7 foot athletic prospect who can play some right now.
RIP Crushalot😞
How about David Lee to the LA Clippers

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy