Posted by McK1:
why take Bayless or Gordon when you have Crawful? like Randolph and Curry its likely he has little trade value due to his contract.
Why take Danilo as a PF when you have Zach Randolph or David Lee? The same logic applies here!
It's simple why you take those guys.. because they are PTP'ers.. we know that they are good. We need a facelift in our backcourt, Walsh has said that he selected Danilo because he doesn't know what type of contribution either of those two players would have given.. YET he selected Gallinari? Is that justified? They masquerade the true answer to that question by saying oh we've been watching Danilo for a year. Pure Fodder! You go with what you Know! Dick Vitale said it best yesterday, and Jay Bilas was on point as well when they questioned this selection. This is a mystery pick, we don't need to base our NYK future on an unknown.
Don't get me wrong, I ain't knocking Danilo.. because I don't know what he can do on the court. Everything is pure speculation when attempting to critique his game. By all accounts, scouts have cited that he plays no D, and what was also a little less than to be desired was Danilo's request to workout alone. Just a shooting drill, no physical contact against other players. He didn't want to decrease his chances of being selected. That is kind of suspect in my opinion. Quite Soft! Yet, This our PF.
I'll admit his highlights look superb.. but usually most highlights are impressive wouldn't you agree? Bottomline is, As a Knick Fan I hope that Danilo is nice like Dirk or Detlef. That being said, hope is the operative word in that statement. We wouldn't guess on what we'd be getting with Gordon or Bayless.
[Edited by - JayNYC on 06-27-2008 10:10 AM]
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/
I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind