They played all the vets the whole game--after 73 games can't they just come to a reasonable agreement that the team isnt very good as is? It's the same thing every game--the other team gets out to a 10-20 point lead--they let up Knicks come back team B gets the lead back out again and that happens roughly 3-4 times.
What comes of not playing Chandler Morris Collins Balkman 30 minutes? We will only win 25% of the time no matter who is in there on the current roster so why not give those kids a chance to play the last 10--the vets played most of the first 73 and we stink. Why change the evaluation process?
the only thing I can think of is 2-3 Knick vets went to IT and said play us because we want ton win[yeah right 70 games to latye?] and now IT trying to save atleast is bench position is kssing their arses.
Let me be frank with the Knick players if they read the message boards[which they probably don't



You don't have the personell to protect the hoop you don't have a player who can pressure the ball--you dont really have a solid go to player or STAR your not very fast or quick and overall look at your record over the last few years--we sck! Now we need different direction--we need a new focus some players must go and that is that. Get a grip---don't try to be selfish to the fan--we dont want you to win one more game--and while you may say FU--no--the Knick fan has already been fcked quite hard and we DESERVE a great chance at getting some HOPE for the future and it sure isnt with the most of the players we have now.
Just figure this--we lost and were behind double digits again most of the way--yet Q Rich and Jefferies had season best games--I mean what does that say? It measn we sck as a team!!~
blah