It was a great watch. But who writes them? They were way off on why they traded him in 92. He had a resurgence in 91-92 after Pat Riley got to town and they made a trade for someone they thought had superstar potential in Charles Smith. I remember Riley being really upset about trading him and only did it to make the team "better".

I completely disagreed with the trade at the time but thats not the point. The point was the writers said "In 92 it was time for a change and Mark Jackson was traded." Thats just some BS. I remember the story on MSG like it was yesterday. WHY DONT THE PEOPLE WHO WRITE THE STUFF DO THE SAME?!?!?!?