Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by 4949:
I didn't say sign him to half a contract. I said buy out half the contract, to make a deal more attractive to another team. We got a taker in Detroit, why not?
And why can't you buy out half the contract, if another team is gonna pay the other half in his last year?
It just doesn't work that way. If we buyout his contract, he's a free agent regardless of how much we buy him out for. When you buyout a player, you have no rights to him (including no right to trade him).
I'll try this one more time. What I'm saying is 'offer to buy out half of his last year. That way We end up losing only 10 mil and Detroit (or whoever) pays only 10 mil. With that scenario, it makes it a lot more attractive for someone to pick him up. In exchange, we get a couple of draft picks. We get rid of starbury for next year, and we have a couple of drafts coming our way.
Detroit wouldn't need them, because they are one of the elite teams. Meanwhile, we can use the drafts to make quality picks, if they exist, or use them for trade bait. The only reason I'd want to make this trade now' is because someone's actually interested in him. This may be our only chance to get rid of him. The other beauty is, if Detroit starts to have a bad season (and remember, starbury would be on their team now), then our stock goes up in the future drafts'.
What do ya think? I'm sure there's been joint payments on someone contracts before. I just can't think of any right now.
[Edited by - 4949 on 03-09-2008 9:45 PM]
I'll never trust this' team again.