[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Novel idea for Zeke's latest excuse: If the NBA game has changed so much start Jefferies at C!!!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
2/28/2008  8:58 AM
Knicks fans have been dreaming of an agile center who can run and disrupt shots in the paint...

pg. Nate
sg: Crawford
sf: Lee
pf:Randolph
c: Jefferies
AUTOADVERT
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
2/28/2008  1:58 PM
I floated this idea a few months back. Its unorthodox but the man is 6'11 and as a SF he is only blocking the progress and playing time of Balkman and Chandler.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
2/28/2008  2:39 PM
Posted by kam77:

I floated this idea a few months back. Its unorthodox but the man is 6'11 and as a SF he is only blocking the progress and playing time of Balkman and Chandler.

He would be more effective than Curry or Lee at disrupting shots up the middle...

I never feel right about rooting for a player to get injured... but I would like to see Q get injured, so Balkman or Lee can start at SF and Chandler can get some run.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2008  3:15 PM
Lee at SF i don't like... why not have Balk start at the 3 w/Lee & Zach upfront? Balk's a better shotblocker than Jefferies regardless of his shorter height IMO... u can then start Q Rich at the 2 w/Jamal at point & have Nate be the 6th man.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Panos
Posts: 30588
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/28/2008  3:15 PM
JEFFRIES IS TERRIBLE. Jesus. ARE YOU WATCHING THE GAMES?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2008  3:36 PM
seriously, i don't see a guy on this team as insignificant in terms of his production on the court than that guy... he just looks like a really tall dude running around the court like a chicken with its head cut off on most possessions... i would so much rather see Chandler or Morris getting minutes over fishlips.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Panos
Posts: 30588
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/28/2008  3:39 PM
Posted by TMS:

seriously, i don't see a guy on this team as insignificant in terms of his production on the court than that guy... he just looks like a really tall dude running around the court like a chicken with its head cut off on most possessions... i would so much rather see Chandler or Morris getting minutes over fishlips.

THANK YOU! A voice of reason. JFC!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2008  3:43 PM
LOL! JFC... make mine extra crispy.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Klytus
Posts: 20276
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2007
Member: #1743
2/28/2008  3:59 PM
Posted by TMS:

Lee at SF i don't like... why not have Balk start at the 3 w/Lee & Zach upfront? Balk's a better shotblocker than Jefferies regardless of his shorter height IMO... u can then start Q Rich at the 2 w/Jamal at point & have Nate be the 6th man.

And what difference will this make? lol
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34080
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127
2/28/2008  4:03 PM
Posted by Panos:

JEFFRIES IS TERRIBLE. Jesus. ARE YOU WATCHING THE GAMES?

Actually, I'm not (but I saw plenty of him when I lived in DC and he played there). So, yes, he is utter garbage. But this utter garbage may be better than our franchise-caliber garbage.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2008  4:14 PM
Posted by Klytus:
Posted by TMS:

Lee at SF i don't like... why not have Balk start at the 3 w/Lee & Zach upfront? Balk's a better shotblocker than Jefferies regardless of his shorter height IMO... u can then start Q Rich at the 2 w/Jamal at point & have Nate be the 6th man.

And what difference will this make? lol

you would have a more mobile frontcourt over starting Curry at C, which means u can run a more uptempo style game in the open court... you would also keep Jefferies' sorry butt on the bench where he belongs... either way, it's an improvement.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Klytus
Posts: 20276
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2007
Member: #1743
2/28/2008  4:21 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Klytus:
Posted by TMS:

Lee at SF i don't like... why not have Balk start at the 3 w/Lee & Zach upfront? Balk's a better shotblocker than Jefferies regardless of his shorter height IMO... u can then start Q Rich at the 2 w/Jamal at point & have Nate be the 6th man.

And what difference will this make? lol

you would have a more mobile frontcourt over starting Curry at C, which means u can run a more uptempo style game in the open court... you would also keep Jefferies' sorry butt on the bench where he belongs... either way, it's an improvement.

These players stink. My God, what more prove do you need? It has nothing to do with lineups or X's and O's. They are not good players. Come on already.
Panos
Posts: 30588
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/28/2008  4:35 PM
TMS don't waste your time.
Look Klytus, we all know the Knicks suck. What's your point?
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
2/28/2008  4:36 PM
Novel ID for Zeke, if the NBA has changed don't trade lottery picks for big men!!!
I just hope that people will like me
Panos
Posts: 30588
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
2/28/2008  4:38 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

Novel ID for Zeke, if the NBA has changed don't trade lottery picks for big men!!!

Amen. Especially non-franchise ones.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
2/28/2008  5:00 PM
Posted by Klytus:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by Klytus:
Posted by TMS:

Lee at SF i don't like... why not have Balk start at the 3 w/Lee & Zach upfront? Balk's a better shotblocker than Jefferies regardless of his shorter height IMO... u can then start Q Rich at the 2 w/Jamal at point & have Nate be the 6th man.

And what difference will this make? lol

you would have a more mobile frontcourt over starting Curry at C, which means u can run a more uptempo style game in the open court... you would also keep Jefferies' sorry butt on the bench where he belongs... either way, it's an improvement.

These players stink. My God, what more prove do you need? It has nothing to do with lineups or X's and O's. They are not good players. Come on already.

Come on already what? We're not supposed to discuss Knick lineups on a Knicks site?
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2008  6:27 PM
my bad, i forgot we had Josh Howard & Shawn Marion on the bench who should be seeing minutes over Balkman... what was i thinking.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
freeskier
Posts: 20124
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 11/6/2006
Member: #1202
2/28/2008  11:30 PM
lee at 3??? can you immagine him guarding lebron??
« Reply To Topic
Novel idea for Zeke's latest excuse: If the NBA game has changed so much start Jefferies at C!!!
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy