Posted by BRIGGS:
LOL Mike Beasley is WAY better than *any* Knick right now--he's better than Artest --if we somehow get Beasley he'll be starting 3 from day 1 no doubt about it--and it's going to take some really lousy play the rest of the 26 games[in our best interests though] to be a *bottom* five which gives us a true/realistic chance to possibly get that pick because other team WILL start to tank like Charlotte La Clippers etc...
One thing I noticed tonight--we're one fckn small team. Were setting a record for the least amount of blocked shots in NBA history? David Lee Randolph and Curry are always getting swatted.
[quote]
posted by Colorfl1:I am all for a shot blocking C, if you have not noticed, they are not that easy to obtain.
Who are you kidding, this team cannot do a "true" blazers style rebuilding, we are simply unable to get rid of all the dead weight and their contracts for at least another 2-3 years...
Briggs, I always respect your analysis a great deal, but if you put agendas aside for a moment, you will realize that if this team had Artest instead of Q, we would have at least 10 more wins right now.
Go through the schedule... Q's awful first 2 months of the season, all the close losses, with 0 serious contributions coming from the 3 spot.
Ron Artest has heart! He is not Marbury, Curry, Penny or Frances... he is an elite defensive player that gets fired up at the opportunity to compete.
You cannot minimize the difference he makes on this team if you replace him with Q... just check the box scores... at least 10 wins!
[Edited by - colorfl1 on 02-25-2008 02:30 AM]