| Author | Thread |
|
joec32033
Posts: 30632 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
With this revelation:
New York Trade Breakdown Change in Team Outlook: +5.1 ppg, +1.5 rpg, and +0.7 apg. Incoming Players Gerald Green 6-8 SF / SG 4.8 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 1.2 apg in 12.0 minutes Damien Wilkins 6-6 SG 9.4 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.2 apg in 25.3 minutes Outgoing Players Wilson Chandler 6-8 SF 3.3 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.4 apg in 7.5 minutes Fred Jones 6-2 SG 5.8 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 2.3 apg in 24.0 minutes Chandler to Minny, Jones to Seattle-just like the proposed trade I posted before. These are two minor trades that can pay off. No big money involved. I can definitely picture: Curry Randolph Wilkins Green Crawford Green and Craw in the back court is sick(and I am not saying Green starts right away-long term). Whatcha' think? ~You can't run from who you are.~
|
| AUTOADVERT |
|
joec32033
Posts: 30632 Alba Posts: 37 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #583 USA |
Posted by Cosmic:Posted by EnySpree: Who said anything about saving the season? You can still acquire talent, you can still judge what you need. This is the problem with the WHOLE Isiah reign. He constantly thinks he is one move away. Thin about the names he acquired. Jalen Rose, Steve Francis, Tim Thomas(who at the time was given a cornerstone contract in Milly). All moves to hit the home run. Totally ignoring the fact that you can acquire guys that fill roles and be better off than just acquiring the same type of second to third tier star. Wilkins is a defender(the best defender on Seattle). He can also score and rebound. He reminds me of Raja Bell. What may it cost us? An expiring contract? What is Fred Jones' 5 mil(or whatever it is) going to get us? It'll get us closer to the cap after it expires. And we'll still be over it. I'd take Damien Wilkins in a heartbeat. He would be an automatic starter for us at the 2 or 3. He'd give the team exactly what it needs at the 2 or 3, AND he'll be a solid player. No superstar ego. And we can get a solid role player(we have 1 solid role player in Lee. Maybe 2 others in Nate and Balkman.). As for Green, get him, see what he got, and if it doesn't wor out at the end of the year let him walk(he's a FA). Get rid of one of the 2 young SF's since we don't have room to develop both and trade one in for a guy that showed some AMAZING potential last year. Look at some of the games he put together at the end of las year.Gerald Green You wouldn't give up a role player(albeit a good one) for Green's potential? Everyone here keeps saying how we need a superstar but we don't have the means to acquire one and we have to get lucky in the draft. How about we be proactive. This kid showed some great potential last year. This is called being creative with what you have. We are nowhere near a championship contender until we answer some valid questions. Curry or Randolph? Can Nate be a consistent 2 guard at his size since Jamal is obviiously better at the PG spot? What's up with the 3-spot? I think the bottom line is we have alot of youth where they may or may not have a limited ceiling. How about we get a guy that may develop into a guy we may be able to build around? [Edited by - joec32033 on 26 January 2008 13:18] ~You can't run from who you are.~
|