[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What do you all think of this plan?
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  9:51 AM
With this revelation:

Minnesota's Green Wants A Trade
January 26, 2008 - 7:29 am
RealGM Staff Report -
The Boston Globe has reported that the agent for Minnesota swingman Gerald Green has asked Timberwolves' vice president of basketball operations Kevin McHale and general manager Jim Stack to trade his client.

Green will make $1.4 million this year, and Minnesota opted to decline his option for next season.

He will become an unrestricted free agent this summer.Green Wants Trade

New York Trade Breakdown
Change in Team Outlook: +5.1 ppg, +1.5 rpg, and +0.7 apg.
Incoming Players
Gerald Green
6-8 SF / SG
4.8 ppg, 2.2 rpg, 1.2 apg in 12.0 minutes
Damien Wilkins
6-6 SG
9.4 ppg, 3.0 rpg, 2.2 apg in 25.3 minutes
Outgoing Players
Wilson Chandler
6-8 SF
3.3 ppg, 1.6 rpg, 0.4 apg in 7.5 minutes
Fred Jones
6-2 SG
5.8 ppg, 2.1 rpg, 2.3 apg in 24.0 minutes


Chandler to Minny, Jones to Seattle-just like the proposed trade I posted before.

These are two minor trades that can pay off. No big money involved.

I can definitely picture:

Curry
Randolph
Wilkins
Green
Crawford

Green and Craw in the back court is sick(and I am not saying Green starts right away-long term).

Whatcha' think?
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

1/26/2008  10:21 AM
I agree with the theory of trying to trade for young players with low contract numbers that hasn't had a chance to get much playing time for whatever reason. Guys like Green, H.Armstrong, Justin Williams, M Almond, Tyrus Thomas, K. Lowry , etc.....

I like the idea of getting Green or Wilkins but maybe not both together. I see them both as Shooting Guards. Wilkins is built similar to Q Rich (6'6 225) minus the damaged back, but Wilk isn't long enough to guard most SF's.

I think this is the way the Knicks must move forward. Analyze other teams rosters for those diamond in the ruff type players who aren't going to hurt the salary cap much.



[Edited by - bigbeast on 26-01-2008 11:03 AM]
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/26/2008  11:10 AM
Maybe we should make a diamond in the rough thread.

What you think of that plan?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/26/2008  11:25 AM
Posted by EnySpree:

Maybe we should make a diamond in the rough thread.

What you think of that plan?

I agree.

What's with the sudden feeling we're only a side-step trade away from competing these days?

Damien Wilkens and Gerald Green are NOT saving this team. They might make it WORSE to be honest!

Besides...we all know Isiah is drooling over trades for Arenas or Artest or Miles - where we give up all our expirings, our 08 pick, probably Lee or Balkman or Nate - and bring back one of the above three and a lot of garbage in return (like kenny thomas, SAR, Brad Miller, Bibby, LaFrentz, etc.... you know, typical Isiah trade, give up the farm, get "his man", take back a lot of garbage as collateral damage just to get the trade done)

bleh......Thomas is dangerous. Like George Bush dangerous (think Iran).

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/26/2008  12:18 PM
These moves don't follow the type of plan that we need to be looking to institute. We need to be looking for players that have High BB IQ's and can play both ends effectively. Wilkins and Green won't change the team in any substantive way IMO. A bit more shooting, athletics and youth, but not much else.

We'll see if Isiah is in full win now mode or just trying to get wins and boost the teams morale. If he's in full win now mode then he'll go against his statement not to make any trades and we'll see him go after an Artest of someone like that. Otherwise his not playing the likes of Chandler, mardy and Morris is merely a coach looking to give his team a chance to win and make up some games. He may not feel Chandler and Morris are ready to help. Mardy may just be a case of the guy getting healthy and into shape as the year has moved along.

In any event i'm not anxious to make any trades at this point. We need to stop making lateral moves. Only trade we need is to perhaps bring in another 1st rounder or to cut some years off the cap. I think Isiah is comfortable with the team as it is right now and reluctant to make any changes. I don't forsee any big trades unless it's a no brainer to improve the team significantly.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  1:18 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by EnySpree:

Maybe we should make a diamond in the rough thread.

What you think of that plan?

I agree.

What's with the sudden feeling we're only a side-step trade away from competing these days?

Damien Wilkens and Gerald Green are NOT saving this team. They might make it WORSE to be honest!

Besides...we all know Isiah is drooling over trades for Arenas or Artest or Miles - where we give up all our expirings, our 08 pick, probably Lee or Balkman or Nate - and bring back one of the above three and a lot of garbage in return (like kenny thomas, SAR, Brad Miller, Bibby, LaFrentz, etc.... you know, typical Isiah trade, give up the farm, get "his man", take back a lot of garbage as collateral damage just to get the trade done)

bleh......Thomas is dangerous. Like George Bush dangerous (think Iran).


Who said anything about saving the season? You can still acquire talent, you can still judge what you need. This is the problem with the WHOLE Isiah reign. He constantly thinks he is one move away. Thin about the names he acquired. Jalen Rose, Steve Francis, Tim Thomas(who at the time was given a cornerstone contract in Milly). All moves to hit the home run. Totally ignoring the fact that you can acquire guys that fill roles and be better off than just acquiring the same type of second to third tier star.

Wilkins is a defender(the best defender on Seattle). He can also score and rebound. He reminds me of Raja Bell. What may it cost us? An expiring contract? What is Fred Jones' 5 mil(or whatever it is) going to get us? It'll get us closer to the cap after it expires. And we'll still be over it. I'd take Damien Wilkins in a heartbeat. He would be an automatic starter for us at the 2 or 3. He'd give the team exactly what it needs at the 2 or 3, AND he'll be a solid player. No superstar ego. And we can get a solid role player(we have 1 solid role player in Lee. Maybe 2 others in Nate and Balkman.).

As for Green, get him, see what he got, and if it doesn't wor out at the end of the year let him walk(he's a FA). Get rid of one of the 2 young SF's since we don't have room to develop both and trade one in for a guy that showed some AMAZING potential last year. Look at some of the games he put together at the end of las year.Gerald Green

You wouldn't give up a role player(albeit a good one) for Green's potential? Everyone here keeps saying how we need a superstar but we don't have the means to acquire one and we have to get lucky in the draft. How about we be proactive. This kid showed some great potential last year.

This is called being creative with what you have. We are nowhere near a championship contender until we answer some valid questions. Curry or Randolph? Can Nate be a consistent 2 guard at his size since Jamal is obviiously better at the PG spot? What's up with the 3-spot?

I think the bottom line is we have alot of youth where they may or may not have a limited ceiling. How about we get a guy that may develop into a guy we may be able to build around?

[Edited by - joec32033 on 26 January 2008 13:18]
~You can't run from who you are.~
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/26/2008  2:07 PM
what is damien wilkins upside? Fred Jones?

Now- Gerald Green might have upside- however, if he is unrestricted this summer, why trade for him? why not just sign him. We have no pure 2, and we could promise him lots of minutes there.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  3:03 PM
Posted by franco12:

what is damien wilkins upside? Fred Jones?

Now- Gerald Green might have upside- however, if he is unrestricted this summer, why trade for him? why not just sign him. We have no pure 2, and we could promise him lots of minutes there.

1-Damien Wilkins=Raja Bell. That is his upside. I would love to get him.

2-In order to sign Green, you'll probably have to offer a multi year deal. Possibly MLE dollars. Why take the chance he is a bust? It's all about minimizing risk. Take on Green for a few months. See what he has. He doesn't have what it takes? Let him walk and now you have the MLE to use on someone else. Also trading for him opens up a roster spot. Signing him means you would have to Cut someone. I would give up Balkman or Chandler for an early chance to Judge Gerald Green and first dibs on him if he does turn out to be something. He reminds me alot of Gerald Wallace when he first came into the league. All athlete, uber raw. High upside.
~You can't run from who you are.~
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
1/26/2008  3:33 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by franco12:

what is damien wilkins upside? Fred Jones?

Now- Gerald Green might have upside- however, if he is unrestricted this summer, why trade for him? why not just sign him. We have no pure 2, and we could promise him lots of minutes there.

1-Damien Wilkins=Raja Bell. That is his upside. I would love to get him.

2-In order to sign Green, you'll probably have to offer a multi year deal. Possibly MLE dollars. Why take the chance he is a bust? It's all about minimizing risk. Take on Green for a few months. See what he has. He doesn't have what it takes? Let him walk and now you have the MLE to use on someone else. Also trading for him opens up a roster spot. Signing him means you would have to Cut someone. I would give up Balkman or Chandler for an early chance to Judge Gerald Green and first dibs on him if he does turn out to be something. He reminds me alot of Gerald Wallace when he first came into the league. All athlete, uber raw. High upside.

MInnesota is 1-2 million over the luxury tax, you can bet they'll try to unload a contract or two.

I propose Buckner and Green for Fred Jones and Randolph Morris.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  4:03 PM
Posted by kam77:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by franco12:

what is damien wilkins upside? Fred Jones?

Now- Gerald Green might have upside- however, if he is unrestricted this summer, why trade for him? why not just sign him. We have no pure 2, and we could promise him lots of minutes there.

1-Damien Wilkins=Raja Bell. That is his upside. I would love to get him.

2-In order to sign Green, you'll probably have to offer a multi year deal. Possibly MLE dollars. Why take the chance he is a bust? It's all about minimizing risk. Take on Green for a few months. See what he has. He doesn't have what it takes? Let him walk and now you have the MLE to use on someone else. Also trading for him opens up a roster spot. Signing him means you would have to Cut someone. I would give up Balkman or Chandler for an early chance to Judge Gerald Green and first dibs on him if he does turn out to be something. He reminds me alot of Gerald Wallace when he first came into the league. All athlete, uber raw. High upside.

MInnesota is 1-2 million over the luxury tax, you can bet they'll try to unload a contract or two.

I propose Buckner and Green for Fred Jones and Randolph Morris.

Dan Dickau's expiring deal would look really good right now, no?
~You can't run from who you are.~
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  4:17 PM
Here's my thing about them getting rid of a bigger contract. I'm all for it. If we can get a sure thing back. McCants is proving he is very good. Maybe Collins, Balkman, Jones for McCants and Buckner and Green? Maybe throw in Chandler and we can get an honest to goodness shooting guard with a little size who can score in here next to Crawford?

Craw
McCants
Buchner/Q
Randolph
Curry
~You can't run from who you are.~
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/26/2008  5:38 PM
i would love to get Greene, i think he's got definite star potential... i just don't see us getting him for that package you proposed.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
martin
Posts: 80249
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/26/2008  6:13 PM
Posted by TMS:

i would love to get Greene, i think he's got definite star potential... i just don't see us getting him for that package you proposed.

here'w what I don't get though. If Greene even sniffed at star potential wouldn't the TWolves have picked up his option to keep him on the cheap for another year? And I think his rep in BOS was not good.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/26/2008  6:40 PM
he wouldn't be the first HS kid to take a while to mature... i don't see him becoming the next Kobe necessarily but we really haven't seen him get enough burn in NBA action to gauge his full potential... he's shown some flashes of brilliance & we definitely know he's got all the physical tools... he may well become the next Darius Miles, no doubt, but it's still way too early to call the kid a bust IMHO... he deserves a shot playing for a coach who believes in his ability & will give him a shot... unfortunately i don't see that happening in NY as long as Isiah's coaching "his" guys.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/26/2008  7:30 PM
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

i would love to get Greene, i think he's got definite star potential... i just don't see us getting him for that package you proposed.

here'w what I don't get though. If Greene even sniffed at star potential wouldn't the TWolves have picked up his option to keep him on the cheap for another year? And I think his rep in BOS was not good.

Exactly what Martin said, TMS. We have a chance to get him on the cheap. If we can, I would. If you are worried about giving up Balkman or Chandler ask Minny for a second round pick along with Green. They obviously could care less about him. Anything they can get for him that will be the least bit productive would have to be gravy for them.

This is where I think Isiah falls short on the trade front. He can spot talent, and he can think of creative ways to get talent(Morris), I really think he has a problem getting a read on other teams and what their situations are. Chicago for Eddy was one example. PHX for Marbury was another. He bids against himself.
~You can't run from who you are.~
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/26/2008  7:34 PM
Posted by franco12:

what is damien wilkins upside? Fred Jones?

Fred Jones has only just begun to explore his upside.
https:// It's not so hard.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/27/2008  1:02 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by martin:
Posted by TMS:

i would love to get Greene, i think he's got definite star potential... i just don't see us getting him for that package you proposed.

here'w what I don't get though. If Greene even sniffed at star potential wouldn't the TWolves have picked up his option to keep him on the cheap for another year? And I think his rep in BOS was not good.

Exactly what Martin said, TMS. We have a chance to get him on the cheap. If we can, I would. If you are worried about giving up Balkman or Chandler ask Minny for a second round pick along with Green. They obviously could care less about him. Anything they can get for him that will be the least bit productive would have to be gravy for them.

This is where I think Isiah falls short on the trade front. He can spot talent, and he can think of creative ways to get talent(Morris), I really think he has a problem getting a read on other teams and what their situations are. Chicago for Eddy was one example. PHX for Marbury was another. He bids against himself.

i'm not afraid to give up Chandler in the least... on the contrary i think Greene has alot bigger upside... i'm just a little unsure whether we can get him for a player who hasn't seen a sniff of NBA action since we drafted him... if u could get him for Chandler straight up i say go for it... i wanna keep Balkman though for sure.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
What do you all think of this plan?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy