Posted by islesfan:
I still don't get how you equate "mediocre defense" to "no defense".
I base it on the few games that I've seen him play and his stats.
What are you basing your assessment that he plays "no defense"?
what is there to equate? the "mediocre" thing is your opinion.
apparently we've watched a comparable number of 06-07 celtics and 07-08 t-wolves games: "few." i backed up my "no defense" opinion with an article written by a twolves beat reporter who watches and blogs most if not all of those games, apparently. the reason i took note of it when i first saw it was that the reputation has dogged AJ since his celtics days, and i was disappointed to hear it again in such forceful terms.
Posted by islesfan:
Geez, now he's in Curry's class defensively as well?
Why do you insist on comparing a "C" student to 2 guys who consistently get "F"'s?
i bet people around the league would use the same terms to describe eddy and al's effort and effectiveness on defense. they both have the same reputation. that's my point. other than reputation, it's hard to judge myself without being able or even really wanting to see more of his games.
i really don't care who's better between those three dudes. what kind of pathetic competition is that? if you think AJ's better than zach and eddy, i won't argue with that. two whole letter grades better, though? you haven't shown any evidence at all that that's the case.
i am holding AJ to the same standard i use to *criticize* eddy and zach. i have yet to really grasp what standards you are using.
EDIT: and to be clear, and maybe make this my final word on the matter - the standard i use is - if a player is routinely criticized for not trying on defense, and doesn't perform near what their expertise, abilities and efforts on the offensive end indicate they're capable of - i will have roughly that same opinion of them overall regardless of offensive stats.
[Edited by - Masterplan on 01-28-2008 5:16 PM]