[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

41 Games: First Half glance
Author Thread
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  9:47 AM
Eh, yeah, I'm bored lol...


Lost 1
Won 2
Lost 8
Won 2
Lost 1
Won 1
Lost 1
Won 1
Lost 5
Won 1
Lost 1
Won 1
Lost 7
Won 1
Lost 2
Won 3
Lost 1
Won 1
Lost 1



Last 10 Games: 5-5 = .500

Just like last year, start like total trash, then suddenly start playing to the best of their abilities, and start playing .500 basketball.

Much like last year we have multiple blowout losses and close victories.


Blah....... evident progress MY ASS - Isiah this year is the worst season YET!!!

Through 41 games, last six seasons..:

0203 - 17-24 (DC)
0304 - 17-24 (DC,LW)
0405 - 17-24 (LW,HW)
0506 - 14-27 (LB)
0607 - 17-24 (IT)
0708 - 13-28 (IT)



HAHAHAHA @ 17-24 my god.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
AUTOADVERT
JonsTintedTails
Posts: 20248
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2005
Member: #852
USA
1/23/2008  9:51 AM
Wait till this west coast trip is over.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/23/2008  9:53 AM
I woke up and the sun was shining and I saw the birds outside my window, then I go to my computer and you brought the dark clouds back

It's pretty pathetic when you look at the starts we've had over the years. Hey but look at that consistency!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  10:01 AM
Posted by nixluva:

I woke up and the sun was shining and I saw the birds outside my window, then I go to my computer and you brought the dark clouds back

It's pretty pathetic when you look at the starts we've had over the years. Hey but look at that consistency!

Poor off-season work ethic? I think so.

Think about how many training camps were wasted because they were spent on players losing weight.
Which then led to Preseason being used as training camp.
Which then led to the first 15 or so games of the regular season looking like preseason.
Then the next 10 games of regular season, where teams get it together, we're looking like we just started the season.

It's a very bad cascading effect. Teams that use the SUMMER to get into shape can use TRAINING CAMP to learn and can use PRESEASON to impliment the training camp, and then are actually ready to go by the Regular Season.

Not us, we're always a huge step behind.

It's sad...and you could really see it this year with how grossly out of shape Marbury, Curry, Q, Zach were when we first saw them. Inexcusable!
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

1/23/2008  10:51 AM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by nixluva:

I woke up and the sun was shining and I saw the birds outside my window, then I go to my computer and you brought the dark clouds back

It's pretty pathetic when you look at the starts we've had over the years. Hey but look at that consistency!

Poor off-season work ethic? I think so.

Think about how many training camps were wasted because they were spent on players losing weight.
Which then led to Preseason being used as training camp.
Which then led to the first 15 or so games of the regular season looking like preseason.
Then the next 10 games of regular season, where teams get it together, we're looking like we just started the season.

It's a very bad cascading effect. Teams that use the SUMMER to get into shape can use TRAINING CAMP to learn and can use PRESEASON to impliment the training camp, and then are actually ready to go by the Regular Season.

Not us, we're always a huge step behind.

It's sad...and you could really see it this year with how grossly out of shape Marbury, Curry, Q, Zach were when we first saw them. Inexcusable!


It's why players like Marbury get no credit from me when he decided to come around after 2 1/2 months last yr. Fans were making ridiculous statements like "Marbury Had His Best Season As A Pro Last Yr". Uhhhh no he decided to be a good boy and got into shape after almost 1/3 of the season was gone. 2 things he supposed to do as a pro and what he gets paid to do.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-23-2008 12:11 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  12:41 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:





It's why players like Marbury get no credit from me when he decided to come around after 2 1/2 months last. Fans were making ridiculous statements like "Marbury Had His Best Season As A Pro Last Yr". Uhhhh no he decided to be a good boy and got into shape after almost 1/3 of the season was gone. 2 things he supposed to do as a pro and what he gets paid to do.


Yeah, I hear ya. It's pathetic how many of our players aren't into game shape until half the season is already gone. That's all on Isiah for acquiring such useless passionateless boneheads and allowing them to do as they please. His "I've tried everything" crap from the other nights post game doesn't fly with me. Had he done his homework? He wouldn't be in this position.

Anyways....

I will say one thing in Marbury's defense though, and believe me it does not excuse his unprofessional attitude but I do believe it's why he's been so unprofessional especially as of late.

When he was first acquired it was done so that he could be the superstar gunner, with complete control of the offense, surrounded by willing role players, the franchise player. Know what? It worked! It wasn't pretty but it worked (25-21 record, playoff birth when we were already written off)

Isiah then for whatever reason abandoned what had a chance to work and instead of strengthening the supporting cast of hard working role players.... he did the opposite... and traded those guys for gunner after 'athletic' gunner. Who in turn fought Marbury for possessions.

*Oakley said it best in I think 05, "You have to get players who work with steph and not fight steph"*

The end was when we acquired Crawful and for whatever reason Isiah decided he loved Crawful and now Crawful was to be the #1 option and the #1 decision maker. When he did that Isiah did another inexplicable move: Demanded Marbury change his game (to resemble lets say Eric Snow).

I think that's when Marbury began his downfall. It took a long time to finally blow up but that's the point in time I'd pinpoint as Isiah's worst mistake which turned Marbury into the biggest malcontent he could possibly be.

Why would you tell your 46.5% gunner to stop gunning and focus on playing defense and playing off the ball and then give a 39% gunner the keys to chucking up anything he wanted to!? WHO THE HELL DOES THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I swear Isiah would have told Ewing to stop shooting and told Felton Spencer to take 18+ FGAs a game!!!! He is INSANE!!!!

Sad...and I could go on...but I think you know what I'm talking about.

Oh well, time to move on, BoneSpurBury turned SurgeryBury turned RecoverBury can turn into BuyOutBury and damn well should before Isiass trades his expiring for Miles and LaFrentz.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/23/2008  1:01 PM

Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TrueBlue:





It's why players like Marbury get no credit from me when he decided to come around after 2 1/2 months last. Fans were making ridiculous statements like "Marbury Had His Best Season As A Pro Last Yr". Uhhhh no he decided to be a good boy and got into shape after almost 1/3 of the season was gone. 2 things he supposed to do as a pro and what he gets paid to do.


Yeah, I hear ya. It's pathetic how many of our players aren't into game shape until half the season is already gone. That's all on Isiah for acquiring such useless passionateless boneheads and allowing them to do as they please. His "I've tried everything" crap from the other nights post game doesn't fly with me. Had he done his homework? He wouldn't be in this position.

Anyways....

I will say one thing in Marbury's defense though, and believe me it does not excuse his unprofessional attitude but I do believe it's why he's been so unprofessional especially as of late.

When he was first acquired it was done so that he could be the superstar gunner, with complete control of the offense, surrounded by willing role players, the franchise player. Know what? It worked! It wasn't pretty but it worked (25-21 record, playoff birth when we were already written off)

Isiah then for whatever reason abandoned what had a chance to work and instead of strengthening the supporting cast of hard working role players.... he did the opposite... and traded those guys for gunner after 'athletic' gunner. Who in turn fought Marbury for possessions.

*Oakley said it best in I think 05, "You have to get players who work with steph and not fight steph"*

The end was when we acquired Crawful and for whatever reason Isiah decided he loved Crawful and now Crawful was to be the #1 option and the #1 decision maker. When he did that Isiah did another inexplicable move: Demanded Marbury change his game (to resemble lets say Eric Snow).

I think that's when Marbury began his downfall. It took a long time to finally blow up but that's the point in time I'd pinpoint as Isiah's worst mistake which turned Marbury into the biggest malcontent he could possibly be.

Why would you tell your 46.5% gunner to stop gunning and focus on playing defense and playing off the ball and then give a 39% gunner the keys to chucking up anything he wanted to!? WHO THE HELL DOES THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I swear Isiah would have told Ewing to stop shooting and told Felton Spencer to take 18+ FGAs a game!!!! He is INSANE!!!!

Sad...and I could go on...but I think you know what I'm talking about.

Oh well, time to move on, BoneSpurBury turned SurgeryBury turned RecoverBury can turn into BuyOutBury and damn well should before Isiass trades his expiring for Miles and LaFrentz.


good post cosmic.. I wonder tho, with marbury as the main gunner and having a supporting cast of guys who woul do other things, how good would we have been. Do you think staying that course would have been a recipe for success? just curious..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  1:06 PM
Posted by tkf:




good post cosmic.. I wonder tho, with marbury as the main gunner and having a supporting cast of guys who woul do other things, how good would we have been. Do you think staying that course would have been a recipe for success? just curious..

Ya know, I don't really know, but here is what I feel. I know it took us to the playoffs and I feel very strongly we would have returned to the playoffs the next season if we just stayed the course (never made the TT trade or any other trade like Crawford) and kept Lenny on board.

What success beyond that? I don't know I think that would have depended on making smart additions to the hard working defense and team oriented role playing cast. Maybe 2nd round? Even though I compare the situation to the Sixers of 00-01 - no, I don't think we could have had THAT kind of success.

Yet, I do draw parallels to it. (Star gunner + willing role playing hard working core)

We would have been a better team than anything we were after the Nets sweep, an annual playoff team at the least, and when that run fell short? At least we'd have had flexibility to re-build properly. (although that's another argument altogether)


http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/23/2008  1:28 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by tkf:




good post cosmic.. I wonder tho, with marbury as the main gunner and having a supporting cast of guys who woul do other things, how good would we have been. Do you think staying that course would have been a recipe for success? just curious..

Ya know, I don't really know, but here is what I feel. I know it took us to the playoffs and I feel very strongly we would have returned to the playoffs the next season if we just stayed the course (never made the TT trade or any other trade like Crawford) and kept Lenny on board.

What success beyond that? I don't know I think that would have depended on making smart additions to the hard working defense and team oriented role playing cast. Maybe 2nd round? Even though I compare the situation to the Sixers of 00-01 - no, I don't think we could have had THAT kind of success.

Yet, I do draw parallels to it. (Star gunner + willing role playing hard working core)

We would have been a better team than anything we were after the Nets sweep, an annual playoff team at the least, and when that run fell short? At least we'd have had flexibility to re-build properly. (although that's another argument altogether)

yea, good point, because at the time, marbury was young enough, and even had we missed the playoffs the next year, we would have had our lottery pick, and as you said, by now a more manageable cap... I think Isiah wanted crawford first, but he wasn't available, then he got marbury and still had the hots for crawford.. I remember two games, one vs the heat and one vs the bulls, where Jason williams and then crawford torched us in wins.. Isiah praised crawford after that game, saying we don't have guards like that... From that point on, he was hell bent on getting crawford...

here is part of the article from that game .. Jamal Crawford scored 28 points and rookie Kirk Hinrich added 19, two below his career best, as the Chicago Bulls erased a double-digit deficit and snapped the New York Knicks' four-game winning streak with a 104-99 victory Friday night.

that was in 2003-2004 season, crawford finish with 28/6/6. Isiah was all on his jock after that, eventhough that game , we were without Houston, frank williams and eisley got benched.. LOL.. soon I knew crawford would be a knick.... BTW: dikembe Mutombo who was with the knicks then, had 15 points /16 boards and 6 blocks..... dikembe who was past his prime then.. and we have yet to have a big man put up a line like that including blocks....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

1/23/2008  1:32 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by TrueBlue:





It's why players like Marbury get no credit from me when he decided to come around after 2 1/2 months last. Fans were making ridiculous statements like "Marbury Had His Best Season As A Pro Last Yr". Uhhhh no he decided to be a good boy and got into shape after almost 1/3 of the season was gone. 2 things he supposed to do as a pro and what he gets paid to do.


Yeah, I hear ya. It's pathetic how many of our players aren't into game shape until half the season is already gone. That's all on Isiah for acquiring such useless passionateless boneheads and allowing them to do as they please. His "I've tried everything" crap from the other nights post game doesn't fly with me. Had he done his homework? He wouldn't be in this position.

Anyways....

I will say one thing in Marbury's defense though, and believe me it does not excuse his unprofessional attitude but I do believe it's why he's been so unprofessional especially as of late.

When he was first acquired it was done so that he could be the superstar gunner, with complete control of the offense, surrounded by willing role players, the franchise player. Know what? It worked! It wasn't pretty but it worked (25-21 record, playoff birth when we were already written off)

Isiah then for whatever reason abandoned what had a chance to work and instead of strengthening the supporting cast of hard working role players.... he did the opposite... and traded those guys for gunner after 'athletic' gunner. Who in turn fought Marbury for possessions.

*Oakley said it best in I think 05, "You have to get players who work with steph and not fight steph"*

The end was when we acquired Crawful and for whatever reason Isiah decided he loved Crawful and now Crawful was to be the #1 option and the #1 decision maker. When he did that Isiah did another inexplicable move: Demanded Marbury change his game (to resemble lets say Eric Snow).

I think that's when Marbury began his downfall. It took a long time to finally blow up but that's the point in time I'd pinpoint as Isiah's worst mistake which turned Marbury into the biggest malcontent he could possibly be.

Why would you tell your 46.5% gunner to stop gunning and focus on playing defense and playing off the ball and then give a 39% gunner the keys to chucking up anything he wanted to!? WHO THE HELL DOES THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I swear Isiah would have told Ewing to stop shooting and told Felton Spencer to take 18+ FGAs a game!!!! He is INSANE!!!!

Sad...and I could go on...but I think you know what I'm talking about.

Oh well, time to move on, BoneSpurBury turned SurgeryBury turned RecoverBury can turn into BuyOutBury and damn well should before Isiass trades his expiring for Miles and LaFrentz.


While I agree with the overall disdain with us not sticking to a plan there's no way you can sample size half a season and use that as a basis to apologize even 1% for Marbury. We have to factor the change in scenery across the league after the acquisition, especially in the eastern conference. A Marbury dominant centerpiece has a ceiling Cosmic it isn't high. Take for instance Marbury got the Suns to playoffs 2003 season record 44-38(talented team mind you as an 8th seed) with such formula and pushed the Spurs in the layoffs to a 4-2 series. Well what happened the next yr? The team started 3gms below .500 8-11 after 20gms, yes Amare got injured at this point and they proceeded to go 4-11 without him, but Amare missed the whole season 2yrs ago with the Suns and a Nash led Suns team still won 54gms even factoring Joe Johnson being traded. Marbury's value at his best is extremely mediocre and has been his whole career. We've also seen Marbury rapidly deteriorate starting the season LB came here as coach. His burst has left, his knees are wearing and has logged a lot of minutes on his body. Mid season trades can do that for a team, they can give a team a jolt or a spark but they aren't necessarily lasting. The same thing happened when Sacramento traded for Ron Artest, traded mid season made the playoffs and missed the next season. Building around Marbury would have got us a few extra wins than where we've faired the past few seasons that's it. That's why you don't mortgage your future when the ceiling is mediocre to low and we've done it twice on Marbury and Curry.



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-23-2008 12:39 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  5:10 PM
As I said I don't use it to absolve Marbury of his poor attitude, play, and conditioning as of late.

I am just saying I know WHY it's gone down this road. Nothing more nothing less on that specific note.


As for the rest of your post, not sure if you saw it or not, but a few replies upwards to a TKF question I pretty much speak my peace on where it may have led if we had indeed just done the Marbury trade then let it marinate for at least a full season after the half season.

As to whether or not you can assume something from half a season I firmly believe you can. I think we've been lulled into a falsehood that it takes years for any and every team to get things going. There are several very recent examples of teams who went from crap to gold in just a single off-season. Not all of them became elite teams but they all found themselves right back into the playoff mix at the very least right away - and that would be a huge relief around here for fans - to have gone to the playoffs the past few years and then possibly rebuilt when the Marbury+role player experiment failed (yet, again, that's a new secondary topic).

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  5:11 PM
TKF you may very well be correct on how and why Isiah fell in love with Jamal Crawford. It's unfortunate...I mean, he had his gunner in Marbury - why acquire another one who is much worse and try to pair the two together!?

Headscratcher!!! Yet, throw it in with the barrel of other headscratching pairing attempts. Francis-Marbury-Jalen, Marbury-Crawford, Now Curry-Randolph. Ugh...the guy just hasn't a clue!!!!
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  5:14 PM
Ahh, Daily News Live is going to Cover Marbury's surgery (they just spoke about Larry Clown's moaning).

I am recording, if worthwhile I will up in it's own thread. Yet, something came to mind.

A brand new Marbury KnickName:

BOOTBURY (Cause they just showed him wearing that boot).

In a short span of a week we got four new 'bury names.

BoneSpurBury
BootBury
SurgeryBury
RecoveryBury

I kid...because...that's all that is left right now!!! I know some think the KnickNaming is immature but I say so what - comedy is all we got. Besides, how many of you call your friends or co-workers by their real names!? EXACTLY. It's a tri-state area thing. Everyone's got a nickname. So why not the Bricks?
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/23/2008  5:24 PM
Wow......... LOL.
What happened to the knicks being 16-13 when Crawford went down for about 4 weeks with a foot injury and Marbury falling apart afterward??? That was Curry being "handed" the new gunner position that made the knicks fall apart, threw Lenny some how??? What happen to Brown only asking Marbury to be a point guard, but at the same time Crawford was COMING OFF THE BENCH. Marbury was the still the man, but some how that was the backup guards fualt??? Isiah sure handed JC that Gunner role starting last season with him coming off the bench for Francis......... You know he loved JC so much he went out and got franchise, remember???


LOL, old man you got so much hate. It was a good point, but you got so much hate that you think JC was end, when he was first none role player he got... well I guess the second, didn't Tim Thomas come first.



[Edited by - anji on 01-23-2008 5:27 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  5:34 PM
Posted by Anji:

Wow......... LOL.
What happened to the knicks being 16-13 when Crawford went down for about 4 weeks with a foot injury and Marbury falling apart afterward??? That was Curry being "handed" the new gunner position that made the knicks fall apart, threw Lenny some how??? What happen to Brown only asking Marbury to be a point guard, but at the same time Crawford was COMING OFF THE BENCH. Marbury was the still the man, but some how that was the backup guards fualt??? Isiah sure handed JC that Gunner role starting last season with him coming off the bench for Francis......... You know he loved JC so much he went out and got franchise, remember???


LOL, old man you got so much hate. It was a good point, but you got so much hate that you think JC was end, when he was first none role player he got... well I guess the second, didn't Tim Thomas come first.



[Edited by - anji on 01-23-2008 5:27 PM]

As usual, you go personal, and entirely miss the point of the thread or theory.

Year 1: Marbury is the Franchise player. The keys are his.
Year 2: Crawford is the Franchise player. The keys are his. Marbury - go turn into Eric Snow and get out of my sight!
Year 3: Time to force feed Eddy Curry to turn him into a franchise center! Crawford, get yours when you can, Marbury, are you Eric Snow yet? No? Get out of my sight.
Year 4: Oh man, Zach Randolph, I finally got my franchise PF - the KEYS are HIS!. Curry? Time to turn into Dikembe Mutombo now get out of my sight! Crawford? You can still gun away. Marbury? Go home You make me Sick and it's your fault we stink!


If you don't understand that progression of this team nor understand why it has been so DAMAGING - including the middle trades for Tim Thomas, Mo Taylor, Steve Francis, Jalen Rose, Malik Rose, and the additions of Jared Jeffries, Vin Baker, Jerome James - then I have to question whether or not you actually are able to watch the games - and if you can - if you just...watch the games...or absorb what is going on year to year.

Now seriously, kindly remove your nose from my butt, it can't possibly smell that good.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/23/2008  5:49 PM
It's funny though...... by year two are claiming Browns year when JC came off the bench save the last 6 weeks or the Lenny/Herb year where Marbury thought he was the "Best Point in the League" and he was getting Kurt thomas shipped out of town???

I just want to know how many Franchise players come off the bench........ that's all I'm saying. I said it was a good thread, but I don't know how you are trynig to jam in the JC was handed the Franchise player keys in any of these years. I mean you can make an arguement now, but this is only after Marbury Blowing up and Curry-Zach blowing up. LOL
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/23/2008  6:04 PM
Posted by Anji:

It's funny though...... by year two are claiming Browns year when JC came off the bench save the last 6 weeks or the Lenny/Herb year where Marbury thought he was the "Best Point in the League" and he was getting Kurt thomas shipped out of town???

I just want to know how many Franchise players come off the bench........ that's all I'm saying. I said it was a good thread, but I don't know how you are trynig to jam in the JC was handed the Franchise player keys in any of these years. I mean you can make an arguement now, but this is only after Marbury Blowing up and Curry-Zach blowing up. LOL

Crawford: Top ball handler. Runs the point and has for years. Is the #1 decision maker. Has the ball in his hands more than any other player. Takes the most shots on the team and has for years.

What more do you need to see to understand he was handed to keys to the franchise - and was tagged as a franchise player by Isiah? What more must he do or how many more duties must he be #1 in to be considered to franchise player?

Oh, wow, so you're blaming our season's woes on Marbury losing his mind and Zach and Curry not working well together and taking pot shots at each other?

HELLO!!!! This is the basis of my theory here!!!! The theory being that every year Isiah falls in love with yet another new player, makes a drastic move to acquire that player, then features that player while tossing the previous flavor of the year out the window - thus leading to a complete lack of continuity - of which each successive move brought in similar players who never complimented one another but actually led to even more in-fighting and fighting on the court!

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/23/2008  10:22 PM
Posted by Cosmic:
Posted by Anji:

It's funny though...... by year two are claiming Browns year when JC came off the bench save the last 6 weeks or the Lenny/Herb year where Marbury thought he was the "Best Point in the League" and he was getting Kurt thomas shipped out of town???

I just want to know how many Franchise players come off the bench........ that's all I'm saying. I said it was a good thread, but I don't know how you are trynig to jam in the JC was handed the Franchise player keys in any of these years. I mean you can make an arguement now, but this is only after Marbury Blowing up and Curry-Zach blowing up. LOL

Crawford: Top ball handler. Runs the point and has for years. Is the #1 decision maker. Has the ball in his hands more than any other player. Takes the most shots on the team and has for years.

What more do you need to see to understand he was handed to keys to the franchise - and was tagged as a franchise player by Isiah? What more must he do or how many more duties must he be #1 in to be considered to franchise player?

Oh, wow, so you're blaming our season's woes on Marbury losing his mind and Zach and Curry not working well together and taking pot shots at each other?

HELLO!!!! This is the basis of my theory here!!!! The theory being that every year Isiah falls in love with yet another new player, makes a drastic move to acquire that player, then features that player while tossing the previous flavor of the year out the window - thus leading to a complete lack of continuity - of which each successive move brought in similar players who never complimented one another but actually led to even more in-fighting and fighting on the court!

Isiah should switch from love with man to love with a woman.
It doesn’t work with man.
It didn’t work with Anucha too... Hmm... Is she a woman?



"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/23/2008  11:35 PM
what I think you are missing is Isiah has just been accumulating 'talent'. I don't think he ever added one player who he thought fit- he just got lots of pieces.

I think he got crawford because he was available- same for curry.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/24/2008  11:10 AM
Posted by Cosmic:


Crawford: Top ball handler. Runs the point and has for years. Is the #1 decision maker. Has the ball in his hands more than any other player. Takes the most shots on the team and has for years.

What more do you need to see to understand he was handed to keys to the franchise - and was tagged as a franchise player by Isiah? What more must he do or how many more duties must he be #1 in to be considered to franchise player?

Oh, wow, so you're blaming our season's woes on Marbury losing his mind and Zach and Curry not working well together and taking pot shots at each other?

HELLO!!!! This is the basis of my theory here!!!! The theory being that every year Isiah falls in love with yet another new player, makes a drastic move to acquire that player, then features that player while tossing the previous flavor of the year out the window - thus leading to a complete lack of continuity - of which each successive move brought in similar players who never complimented one another but actually led to even more in-fighting and fighting on the court!


Im blaming Marburys ablitly to fold for the knicks losing. Year 1 the Knicks are 16-13 threw 29 and 2-1 with crawford out. Marbury then makes his best point guard quote, the team goes 17-36 in their last 53 and 1-4 with crawford out in the following 5 games after marburys comments. Marbury had his lot of commentary players with JC out over that 8 game period and started out well. He folded after putting pressure on himself with those comments, because that is who he is. Same for last year with Lee, JC, Q and Francis out (for the most part with Q an francis) his all commentary team of Collins, balkman, Rose, James, Jeffries, nate with Curry playing very good ball....... the knicks went 6-12!!!! And he folded under Browns request, then quited with an injury like this year. The guy would have folded no matter who he was playing with. hat's who he is.

And if you really look at his career, he definitly needs a gunner to fight with to make the playoffs. He had KGs 20 when the wolves made it, he had Marions 20 with suns and with the knicks he had Houstons 20 that half season. But now he is too old to even lead a lower profile scoring Currys 20 points per game to the playoffs. Murbury problems is with Marbury.

Marbury was the top ball hander and shot taker until last year. And last year is Curry franchise year, is the only year that JC had more shot's and more useage then Marbury(this year too if things continue). Marbury was the franchise until last November when Curry was suppose to the Franchise because of Marburys bad play coming of his injury in the off-season. So I still don't get were you are seeing JC as the franchise or being giving th franchise. Because all i see see is when Marbury quits or sulks to lack luster play, JC is picking up for him. He quit on Brown and Brown turned to JC at the end of that year. Isiah turned to JC after Franbury fails and niether one of them seem to function when Curry is the first option. So how is he the franchise???

I don't understand how you hate JC so much. The one player that Brown actually liked. Brown thought he could be his point. Brown wanted the ball in JC hands at the endof quarters...... THE GREAT LARRY BROWN STARTED THAT REMEMBER. JC went to the bench for Brown, he went to the bench for Isiah, Lenny liked him, when everything blows up he is the player the coaches lean on. I can understand you not liking that kind of scorer, but why the hate man??? Why?

"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
41 Games: First Half glance

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy