[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Game 40: New York Knicks (12-27) @ Miami Heat (8-30)
Author Thread
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
1/18/2008  9:25 PM
Back to back against our old (literally) buddies in South Beach. I know people are clamoring for Rose, Beasley or Mayo but one of them is definitely wearing Heat colors next season.

Fun fact: In Shaquille O'Neal's illustrious career, this is going to be the FIRST TIME he'll be part of a losing team. Well, he's got his ring w/o Kobe and Kobe is looking to do the same this year (the Lakers got a shot).

Just to cheer everyone up, let's show our greatest moment against the Miami Heat, courtesy of the underdog Knicks of 1999:



Preview forthcoming. Currently, Miami is being destroyed by the Blazers in the 4th. They've scored a whole 2 points with 4 and change left.

(EDIT: Martin or Andrew, change the Heat's record to 8-31. My bad. :))

[Edited by - K22 on 2008-01-18 9:28 PM]
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
AUTOADVERT
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
1/18/2008  9:28 PM
Miami simply cannot score. And now they're tired. I can see the Knicks winning by 30 tomorrow. The Heat are such a terribly constructed team and it's clear Riley is tanking at this point.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
1/19/2008  12:21 AM
The Knicks are going to find some way to lose this game.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/19/2008  6:16 AM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

The Knicks are going to find some way to lose this game.

The Knicks lost an annoying one last night. In the past the players usually come out flat and disinerested and in turn get blown out no matter who is in front of them.

Reality is the Knicks match-up too close to Miami. Their record is 8-31? Yeah but the same guys that won it all are still on the team....minus Walker, add Ricky.

Let Down Alert.....being 12-27 is it even a let down?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  9:14 AM
Knicks prolly will win but they won't do it as easily as they should. Wade will go for 30 to 35, Shaq will get 20 and Davis will get 20. Davis and Wade are the type of players that give the Knicks fits. Shaq is just a shell of his old self but still capable of putting up numbers on our (lack of) interior defense.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/19/2008  5:00 PM
Posted by EnySpree:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

The Knicks are going to find some way to lose this game.

The Knicks lost an annoying one last night. In the past the players usually come out flat and disinerested and in turn get blown out no matter who is in front of them.

Reality is the Knicks match-up too close to Miami. Their record is 8-31? Yeah but the same guys that won it all are still on the team....minus Walker, add Ricky.

Let Down Alert.....being 12-27 is it even a let down?


You know, I'm going to give you food for thought here: I found the 3 consecutive wins and the solid effort (at least offensively) in the first half of last night's game - and even the effort starting with the Spurs loss.... JUST AS AGGRAVATING if not MORE than watching them slowly fall apart last night.

Why? For...where was that effort all season? We saw it until AWOLBURY and then it went away. Yet, there's no excuse for an AWOLBURYHANGOVER to last 30 goddamn games!!!! So, that's just as frustrating to me now, when they decide "hey lets play hard tonight!!!" as much as when they just lay down and die.

That says a lot about their mental fortitude or lack there of......and that speaks volumes about their unlikely chance of success no matter how much time the same core spends together - no matter if they ever find the right coach for them (comeon, theyve had like... 5...lol) - no matter what next bonehead Isiah "I won the talent side of this trade" Thomas move comes next.


/rant...... Oh, BTW - nice rant back to me in that thread last night, I forgot to reply back We all can use a good rant from time to time...
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/19/2008  7:02 PM
lol Isiah

.....I don't think we did anything wrong I just think Washington played really well. They would have beaten a lot of teams last night playing like that......


Ohhh boy... yeah, nice excuse, Isiah.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  7:49 PM
I see the Knicks are off to one of their usual fast starts!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
iyamwutiam
Posts: 20294
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 1/15/2008
Member: #1806
USA
1/19/2008  7:49 PM
I am not an Isiah supporter per se- but I am a pragmatist. When you bring in a player like Randolph- it does take a year - to get that player to 'mesh' with the team per se.

I think we are seeing this year -as the year when Isiah will finally get to have the team buy into his philosophy. Last year -basically he was under the gun to produce some tangible proof that his strategic plan is not just viable but justified. In that year- Curry had a monster year, Crawford had some pretty good games, Nate and Lee showed progress- and Balkman proved he was worth the gamble in terms of being picked in the first round and providing an intriguing mix of athleticism, defense and energy.

It is definitely not an easy task - as any center who is 24/25 does not want to give up being a number one option, any PF who averages a double double does not want to 'share' minutes as Center/PF with Lee and Curry. A shooter like Crawford- does not want to not have 50 point games -so he can become a better distributor and more importantly actually work on the weakest point of his game - taking it to the hole and working the 5-10 foot jumpshot - instead of a oohah 3 pointer. It is hard for a guy like Nate who has EXTREME athleticism for a 5'9" guard to not take it to the hole and learn to shoot from the perimeter. It is much harder to get a superstar like Marbury buy into less minutes, more defense, and play a Chauncey Billups type role instead of a Nash type role. It is hard to tell guys like Jeffries/James/Balkman - that despite all ths 'hype' about defense - that players like Ben Wallace, Rodman etc are no longer the archtype- because the athleticism of people like Gerald Wallace, Le Bron James, Kobe Bryant, Amare, Matrix,Dwight Howard, KG and of course Joe Johnson makes them indefensible- and so if you can't at least score 10 points a game as well as get your rebounds/blocks/steals etc - you don't have a long term future in the NBA.

You don't have to be a team of superstar per se to win the championship, and if you don't have trade fodder like a Patrick Ewing, Joe Johnson, Amare, etc then you have to do the next best thing - get a roster of guys who 1-10 can all shoot , hustle and know their roles. This is not going to happen in less than a year and I do believe that Randolph is the missing piece- especially if he works on his inside game.

I am sure - we lost the game - because the Knicks started to 'believe' that their run on making the outside shot - made them shooters-especially after three wins in a row against decent teams. But -really- as we saw from the Nets, Detroit and especially the wizrds- the lack of a dominant inside player- forces the opposing team to foul and collapse to the dominant post players.
In my view- the knicks (players) forgot - why they shot so well - mainly because they had wide open looks due to the fact that the other teams were afraid of the post presence or damage of the Knicks.

If the Knicks come out and score 5-10 baskets in the posts in the first quarter of every game - the knicks are going to win- since that will leave some decent (not great) shooters wide open - and allow them to 'hit' the shot. This is the philosophy. Throw it in the post, punish them with fouls and or inside scores early- force the team to collpase to the post - and decent shooters if they hit at 45% will win you the game. No one player is dominant- and no one player can take over- it is a synergy -that is dependent first and foremost on post play- this has been the formula from Shaq/T Duncan championships.

This doesn't mean that there isn't aLe Bron , MJ formula which is equally effective - but those players are even rarer than Shaq- notice Amare/KG/ Dwight Howard .
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  7:58 PM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

I am not an Isiah supporter per se- but I am a pragmatist. When you bring in a player like Randolph- it does take a year - to get that player to 'mesh' with the team per se.

I think we are seeing this year -as the year when Isiah will finally get to have the team buy into his philosophy. Last year -basically he was under the gun to produce some tangible proof that his strategic plan is not just viable but justified. In that year- Curry had a monster year, Crawford had some pretty good games, Nate and Lee showed progress- and Balkman proved he was worth the gamble in terms of being picked in the first round and providing an intriguing mix of athleticism, defense and energy.

It is definitely not an easy task - as any center who is 24/25 does not want to give up being a number one option, any PF who averages a double double does not want to 'share' minutes as Center/PF with Lee and Curry. A shooter like Crawford- does not want to not have 50 point games -so he can become a better distributor and more importantly actually work on the weakest point of his game - taking it to the hole and working the 5-10 foot jumpshot - instead of a oohah 3 pointer. It is hard for a guy like Nate who has EXTREME athleticism for a 5'9" guard to not take it to the hole and learn to shoot from the perimeter. It is much harder to get a superstar like Marbury buy into less minutes, more defense, and play a Chauncey Billups type role instead of a Nash type role. It is hard to tell guys like Jeffries/James/Balkman - that despite all ths 'hype' about defense - that players like Ben Wallace, Rodman etc are no longer the archtype- because the athleticism of people like Gerald Wallace, Le Bron James, Kobe Bryant, Amare, Matrix,Dwight Howard, KG and of course Joe Johnson makes them indefensible- and so if you can't at least score 10 points a game as well as get your rebounds/blocks/steals etc - you don't have a long term future in the NBA.

You don't have to be a team of superstar per se to win the championship, and if you don't have trade fodder like a Patrick Ewing, Joe Johnson, Amare, etc then you have to do the next best thing - get a roster of guys who 1-10 can all shoot , hustle and know their roles. This is not going to happen in less than a year and I do believe that Randolph is the missing piece- especially if he works on his inside game.

I am sure - we lost the game - because the Knicks started to 'believe' that their run on making the outside shot - made them shooters-especially after three wins in a row against decent teams. But -really- as we saw from the Nets, Detroit and especially the wizrds- the lack of a dominant inside player- forces the opposing team to foul and collapse to the dominant post players.
In my view- the knicks (players) forgot - why they shot so well - mainly because they had wide open looks due to the fact that the other teams were afraid of the post presence or damage of the Knicks.

If the Knicks come out and score 5-10 baskets in the posts in the first quarter of every game - the knicks are going to win- since that will leave some decent (not great) shooters wide open - and allow them to 'hit' the shot. This is the philosophy. Throw it in the post, punish them with fouls and or inside scores early- force the team to collpase to the post - and decent shooters if they hit at 45% will win you the game. No one player is dominant- and no one player can take over- it is a synergy -that is dependent first and foremost on post play- this has been the formula from Shaq/T Duncan championships.

This doesn't mean that there isn't aLe Bron , MJ formula which is equally effective - but those players are even rarer than Shaq- notice Amare/KG/ Dwight Howard .




Amen to you, good post.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:05 PM
Nate!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
NateTHEGreat
Posts: 20149
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/27/2007
Member: #1710
USA
1/19/2008  8:11 PM
NATEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:12 PM
Nate!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
1/19/2008  8:16 PM
Wow!!! Nate!!
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:21 PM
bad shot by Nate....to early in shot clock. Knicks can win this game if they play smart.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/19/2008  8:21 PM
nates dunk


http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

1/19/2008  8:23 PM
Posted by iyamwutiam:

I am not an Isiah supporter per se- but I am a pragmatist. When you bring in a player like Randolph- it does take a year - to get that player to 'mesh' with the team per se.

I think we are seeing this year -as the year when Isiah will finally get to have the team buy into his philosophy. Last year -basically he was under the gun to produce some tangible proof that his strategic plan is not just viable but justified. In that year- Curry had a monster year, Crawford had some pretty good games, Nate and Lee showed progress- and Balkman proved he was worth the gamble in terms of being picked in the first round and providing an intriguing mix of athleticism, defense and energy.

It is definitely not an easy task - as any center who is 24/25 does not want to give up being a number one option, any PF who averages a double double does not want to 'share' minutes as Center/PF with Lee and Curry. A shooter like Crawford- does not want to not have 50 point games -so he can become a better distributor and more importantly actually work on the weakest point of his game - taking it to the hole and working the 5-10 foot jumpshot - instead of a oohah 3 pointer. It is hard for a guy like Nate who has EXTREME athleticism for a 5'9" guard to not take it to the hole and learn to shoot from the perimeter. It is much harder to get a superstar like Marbury buy into less minutes, more defense, and play a Chauncey Billups type role instead of a Nash type role. It is hard to tell guys like Jeffries/James/Balkman - that despite all ths 'hype' about defense - that players like Ben Wallace, Rodman etc are no longer the archtype- because the athleticism of people like Gerald Wallace, Le Bron James, Kobe Bryant, Amare, Matrix,Dwight Howard, KG and of course Joe Johnson makes them indefensible- and so if you can't at least score 10 points a game as well as get your rebounds/blocks/steals etc - you don't have a long term future in the NBA.

You don't have to be a team of superstar per se to win the championship, and if you don't have trade fodder like a Patrick Ewing, Joe Johnson, Amare, etc then you have to do the next best thing - get a roster of guys who 1-10 can all shoot , hustle and know their roles. This is not going to happen in less than a year and I do believe that Randolph is the missing piece- especially if he works on his inside game.

I am sure - we lost the game - because the Knicks started to 'believe' that their run on making the outside shot - made them shooters-especially after three wins in a row against decent teams. But -really- as we saw from the Nets, Detroit and especially the wizrds- the lack of a dominant inside player- forces the opposing team to foul and collapse to the dominant post players.
In my view- the knicks (players) forgot - why they shot so well - mainly because they had wide open looks due to the fact that the other teams were afraid of the post presence or damage of the Knicks.

If the Knicks come out and score 5-10 baskets in the posts in the first quarter of every game - the knicks are going to win- since that will leave some decent (not great) shooters wide open - and allow them to 'hit' the shot. This is the philosophy. Throw it in the post, punish them with fouls and or inside scores early- force the team to collpase to the post - and decent shooters if they hit at 45% will win you the game. No one player is dominant- and no one player can take over- it is a synergy -that is dependent first and foremost on post play- this has been the formula from Shaq/T Duncan championships.

This doesn't mean that there isn't aLe Bron , MJ formula which is equally effective - but those players are even rarer than Shaq- notice Amare/KG/ Dwight Howard .

This post would have been good and well last year, this year it's another story...Even with the addition of Zach the Knicks should have shown some semblance of improvement...Isiah lost the team when he tried to scapegoat Marbs then didn't bench him after he left the team...Right now it's just a poisonous environment at the Garden and they need to start again...I think Isiah has lost the team...I'll be impressed if the team just says there's along season left so lets just play hard to right this ship and be respectable...

This core has been together a few years now...Time to gel was the mantra the last two years...Results should be this year's mantra...

Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:27 PM
cut down on the long jump shots, go inside, drive to the hoop....please.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:28 PM
Finally someone goes to the line...
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
1/19/2008  8:31 PM
Knicks gonna lose this game because they're just not playing smart ball. Easily a winnable game.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
Game 40: New York Knicks (12-27) @ Miami Heat (8-30)

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy