Posted by King1:
Give me EG isnt he about the same size as Arenas? They guy is athletic can stroke it and understands the game. He is a high character guy and him or Rose are they two I want
And with Arenas out the Wiz seem like a better team...
Before the season started, my hope for the direction of this team was that we would start Mardy, Chandler, Q, ZBo, and Curry to have a huge line-up with perimeter D to mask the interior problems. What I had thought was that this lineup would wear teams out with their physicality. A bench of Nate, Craw, Lee, Balkman would be so lightning quick that the change of pace would destroy teams.
Knowing what we know now about Q and his deficiencies coming off of surgery, maybe that wouldn't have worked either.
Point is, I'd still like to keep going with size. Remember when the biggest complaint on this site was that we had thirteen 6'8" power forwards? That problem hasn't really gone away.
Watching Greene at 6'10" bringing the ball up, stroking treys, and playing all over the floor I saw something that the Knicks definitely do not have.
I'd love to trot out a line-up next year where we had a bigger players by a wide margin at the perimeter positions than any opponent. This would make for better defense and better post entry passes. Less turnovers, better defense, better outside shooting.
Mardy, Balkman, Greene, Randolph, Curry is a line-up that would cause the opposing coach to lose some sleep in terms of dealing with matchup problems.
You sub in Craw, Lee, Chandler for Balkman, Randolph, Mardy, in one wave of subs, and Nate and Randolph could come back in for Curry and Green for a third group. Splitting Randolph and Curry when you don't have a big-time defensive perimeter team on the floor, balancing the scoring, it seems to make sense.
Adding a 6'10" wing like Greene seems like it changes the equation and makes use of the other strong players on the team more than any other player we could draft in my opinion. If you don't do that, we'd have to trade for a player like him anyway because the problem with that position is not going away any time soon.
Alan Hahn:
Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)